Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #15732

Re: What is the proper way to delegate to a private / hidden sub-domain?

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder7.news.weretis.net!paganini.bofh.team!news.killfile.org!usenet-its.stanford.edu!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net>
Newsgroups comp.protocols.dns.bind
Subject Re: What is the proper way to delegate to a private / hidden sub-domain?
Date Wed, 6 May 2020 14:37:59 -0600
Lines 119
Approved bind-users@lists.isc.org
Message-ID <mailman.366.1588797473.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> (permalink)
References <20200506202139.6F9EB18D9BE2@ary.qy> <18371e2e-ca0b-8d92-a634-043a468d2e70@tnetconsulting.net> <7a65a836-b273-b10c-b1eb-cc0e8407befe@tnetconsulting.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host lists.isc.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="------------ms050809070003050203040007"
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1588797487 31907 149.20.1.60 (6 May 2020 20:38:07 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
To bind-users@lists.isc.org
Return-Path <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net>
X-Original-To bind-users@lists.isc.org
Delivered-To bind-users@lists.isc.org
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=tnetconsulting.net; s=2019; t=1588797482; bh=fcOQ40tNMeY12tZShSzx54aVH+ObPET6/5m7GNeU8ng=; h=Subject:From:To:References:Message-ID:Date:User-Agent: MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Disposition: Content-Language:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Date:From: In-Reply-To:Message-ID:MIME-Version:References:Reply-To: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Sender:Subject:To: User-Agent; b=oAXuHwbnz1zCOBzjgDhqNlyOTX7OK8dkM4oYoPw6w+ejJGXcXG7PAU1PPPzA5jzzv laRh2+nqjdwzkF0wwicbtFrqtfsZisyZ0+zWfLmNz0Aq1ESZD0rFaVzY4b6Y46K0Fl 2Zm8QRG9ybWogRsv9QVebW/alh1PLuR0/i1DsTgU=
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0
In-Reply-To <18371e2e-ca0b-8d92-a634-043a468d2e70@tnetconsulting.net>
X-Spam-Status No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,GPG_SIGNED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mx.pao1.isc.org
X-BeenThere bind-users@lists.isc.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.29
Precedence list
List-Id BIND Users Mailing List <bind-users.lists.isc.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://lists.isc.org/mailman/options/bind-users>, <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/>
List-Post <mailto:bind-users@lists.isc.org>
List-Help <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users>, <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <7a65a836-b273-b10c-b1eb-cc0e8407befe@tnetconsulting.net>
X-Mailman-Original-References <20200506202139.6F9EB18D9BE2@ary.qy> <18371e2e-ca0b-8d92-a634-043a468d2e70@tnetconsulting.net>
Xref csiph.com comp.protocols.dns.bind:15732

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On 5/6/20 2:29 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
> That's one of the hard requirements of what I'm doing.  Not doing that 
> is not an option.

To elaborate, the internal clients are in a sequestered network which 
will never have outside access to it.  As such, the outside world can 
never query something from a system in it.

Further, the external publicaly accessible DNS servers exist elsewhere 
on the Internet to provide just enough zone content to make delegation 
happy.

Perhaps the external publicaly accessible parent example.net can 
(blindly) delegate zones to internal private DNS servers.  However I 
dislike this because I believe it leaves things in an unclean state for 
people on the Internet a large.  At the very least it means no route to 
host errors at best or at worst timeouts.

Conversly, what I'm working on will immediately and successfully return 
a response of NXDOMAIN.  Something that I think is cleaner for the 
Internet at large.



-- 
Grant. . . .
unix || die

Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: What is the proper way to delegate to a private / hidden sub-domain? Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-05-06 14:37 -0600
  Re: What is the proper way to delegate to a private / hidden sub-domain? "John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> - 2020-05-06 17:40 -0400

csiph-web