Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #15730

Re: What is the proper way to delegate to a private / hidden sub-domain?

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder7.news.weretis.net!paganini.bofh.team!news.killfile.org!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net>
Newsgroups comp.protocols.dns.bind
Subject Re: What is the proper way to delegate to a private / hidden sub-domain?
Date Wed, 6 May 2020 14:28:26 -0600
Lines 107
Approved bind-users@lists.isc.org
Message-ID <mailman.363.1588796902.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> (permalink)
References <e528b484-5f6e-d45e-58a8-5855cc9b5634@tnetconsulting.net> <EE6093F1-AAD6-4A96-885D-C1355761BF12@s-carlsen.dk> <b2bee524-36c1-180a-6c31-215ffe7a30f0@tnetconsulting.net> <CA+nkc8AVkt5LO8p-LS65E3mGkvzmjtech18-EHQ-zTWhmEUEjQ@mail.gmail.com> <48bed45a-9d31-b7c4-b61c-3c68472b4f00@tnetconsulting.net> <882463E9-0381-4630-960F-E846A2E53562@s-carlsen.dk> <eca4ef81-0910-5dab-b56e-a3441980e380@tnetconsulting.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host lists.isc.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="------------ms060908080105070604060805"
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1588796916 31612 149.20.1.60 (6 May 2020 20:28:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
To bind-users@lists.isc.org
Return-Path <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net>
X-Original-To bind-users@lists.isc.org
Delivered-To bind-users@lists.isc.org
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=tnetconsulting.net; s=2019; t=1588796908; bh=byNOOLP+m4gUXehAuFYyaZ6pIIiCTH0mOkpMNfjX7bE=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Message-ID:Date:User-Agent: MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Disposition: Content-Language:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Date:From: In-Reply-To:Message-ID:MIME-Version:References:Reply-To: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Sender:Subject:To: User-Agent; b=JkjfrwDvs3E29Lcf0J/At+98QMN9l1qDq3DQz3VoA+m+KKF3PPf43SX2XawofPanG ZSD6y655k9vPX44VJ6XFqiYn5y4+/1MYMmRKNuWxFo1MSNdA1s9z+0PHj7EsXn/XSA 4Lr77zehO7vB5RsuA9pG14XEjkb5oDpSBsteggws=
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0
In-Reply-To <882463E9-0381-4630-960F-E846A2E53562@s-carlsen.dk>
X-Spam-Status No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,GPG_SIGNED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mx.pao1.isc.org
X-BeenThere bind-users@lists.isc.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.29
Precedence list
List-Id BIND Users Mailing List <bind-users.lists.isc.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://lists.isc.org/mailman/options/bind-users>, <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/>
List-Post <mailto:bind-users@lists.isc.org>
List-Help <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users>, <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <eca4ef81-0910-5dab-b56e-a3441980e380@tnetconsulting.net>
X-Mailman-Original-References <e528b484-5f6e-d45e-58a8-5855cc9b5634@tnetconsulting.net> <EE6093F1-AAD6-4A96-885D-C1355761BF12@s-carlsen.dk> <b2bee524-36c1-180a-6c31-215ffe7a30f0@tnetconsulting.net> <CA+nkc8AVkt5LO8p-LS65E3mGkvzmjtech18-EHQ-zTWhmEUEjQ@mail.gmail.com> <48bed45a-9d31-b7c4-b61c-3c68472b4f00@tnetconsulting.net> <882463E9-0381-4630-960F-E846A2E53562@s-carlsen.dk>
Xref csiph.com comp.protocols.dns.bind:15730

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On 5/6/20 2:18 PM, Sten Carlsen wrote:
> I believe the answer must lie in the lookup of a named DNS server, which 
> will be resolved to different IPs depending on your location. Then it 
> can point to different servers.

If I understand correctly, that would rely on the DNS server's FQDNs 
being outside of the zone's scope, thus not (potentially) included in 
the additional information section, which could massively mess with that.



-- 
Grant. . . .
unix || die

Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: What is the proper way to delegate to a private / hidden sub-domain? Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-05-06 14:28 -0600

csiph-web