Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #15727

Re: What is the proper way to delegate to a private / hidden sub-domain?

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder7.news.weretis.net!paganini.bofh.team!news.killfile.org!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net>
Newsgroups comp.protocols.dns.bind
Subject Re: What is the proper way to delegate to a private / hidden sub-domain?
Date Wed, 6 May 2020 14:10:56 -0600
Lines 123
Approved bind-users@lists.isc.org
Message-ID <mailman.359.1588795849.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> (permalink)
References <e528b484-5f6e-d45e-58a8-5855cc9b5634@tnetconsulting.net> <EE6093F1-AAD6-4A96-885D-C1355761BF12@s-carlsen.dk> <b2bee524-36c1-180a-6c31-215ffe7a30f0@tnetconsulting.net> <CA+nkc8AVkt5LO8p-LS65E3mGkvzmjtech18-EHQ-zTWhmEUEjQ@mail.gmail.com> <48bed45a-9d31-b7c4-b61c-3c68472b4f00@tnetconsulting.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host lists.isc.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="------------ms000400000300080804000805"
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1588795864 31285 149.20.1.60 (6 May 2020 20:11:04 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
To bind-users@lists.isc.org
Return-Path <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net>
X-Original-To bind-users@lists.isc.org
Delivered-To bind-users@lists.isc.org
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=tnetconsulting.net; s=2019; t=1588795858; bh=s92id+VTkalrsdi7+EJJcZD/DHrtr8jXGW8GyyzkeHQ=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Message-ID:Date:User-Agent: MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Disposition: Content-Language:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Date:From: In-Reply-To:Message-ID:MIME-Version:References:Reply-To: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Sender:Subject:To: User-Agent; b=QS2+pF17GOcOhtvCqOwx7lV9c9D/t8F0LvFzWYyuawtsiNjaR2i2ISriUVlK1q6BD jIV6sn15wn5l+LVvyYTZ4P+Uwe54J1uqsr6NjLhuJA8E/Y8LbXXVuJUr06fp4kvgoF CvoWlRAoiXEaSCvaFCHJ21u9EdoGf/S+w+7PDzuE=
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0
In-Reply-To <CA+nkc8AVkt5LO8p-LS65E3mGkvzmjtech18-EHQ-zTWhmEUEjQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam-Status No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,GPG_SIGNED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mx.pao1.isc.org
X-BeenThere bind-users@lists.isc.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.29
Precedence list
List-Id BIND Users Mailing List <bind-users.lists.isc.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://lists.isc.org/mailman/options/bind-users>, <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/>
List-Post <mailto:bind-users@lists.isc.org>
List-Help <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users>, <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <48bed45a-9d31-b7c4-b61c-3c68472b4f00@tnetconsulting.net>
X-Mailman-Original-References <e528b484-5f6e-d45e-58a8-5855cc9b5634@tnetconsulting.net> <EE6093F1-AAD6-4A96-885D-C1355761BF12@s-carlsen.dk> <b2bee524-36c1-180a-6c31-215ffe7a30f0@tnetconsulting.net> <CA+nkc8AVkt5LO8p-LS65E3mGkvzmjtech18-EHQ-zTWhmEUEjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Xref csiph.com comp.protocols.dns.bind:15727

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On 5/6/20 1:44 PM, Bob Harold wrote:
> Good questions.

:-)

> I think one possibility (to avoid anycast) is to have an internal and
> external view for the "example.net" zone, so it can delegate the lab
> zones to different servers internally and externally.

But how do you do that if the internal and external views are on 
different servers with completely different IPs?

I ask because now you're back to the same issue, just at the parent 
domain:  How does the net zone delegate to different example zones 
depending on if the client is internal or external.

I don't see any options that avoid anycast.

> But that can make the "example.net" zone harder to manage. It would
> be easier to have a split view for "split.example.net" and lab zones 
> "lab#.split.example.net", if the extra level was acceptable.
Please elaborate on what you mean by "split view" hear.  I'm used to 
"split view DNS" being tantamount to what I would use views for.  Which, 
as previously stated, won't work in this case because the different 
views are hosted on different servers.



-- 
Grant. . . .
unix || die

Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: What is the proper way to delegate to a private / hidden sub-domain? Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-05-06 14:10 -0600
  Re: What is the proper way to delegate to a private / hidden sub-domain? "John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> - 2020-05-06 16:21 -0400

csiph-web