Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #15708

Re: DoH plugin for BIND

Path csiph.com!news.uzoreto.com!paganini.bofh.team!news.etla.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!usenet-its.stanford.edu!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
From Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net>
Newsgroups comp.protocols.dns.bind
Subject Re: DoH plugin for BIND
Date Sat, 2 May 2020 17:03:00 +0200
Organization the lounge interactive design
Lines 40
Approved bind-users@lists.isc.org
Message-ID <mailman.331.1588431780.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> (permalink)
References <85af55bb-1b23-b847-3de9-ffb198bc9fb9@web.de> <20200429074035.GA91269@isc.org> <d08a148f-18f6-1972-1064-2f878b79bee2@nixmagic.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2004292100400.16665@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <8670427D-C5E5-42E3-AFEB-BA15F74E5F53@kreme.com> <39825fcf-bcd7-f38a-aeae-2fccc8df0be8@nixmagic.com> <002174a6-4025-fad1-afea-0e96f40d2ff0@thelounge.net> <20200502093032.09f4b5cf@ime1.iment.local> <dbcfcbfc-c092-88fe-f6ba-7cedfa45127d@nixmagic.com> <c1cda6ec-0f6c-4a1b-899b-8f7ea1dade43@thelounge.net> <20200502103900.189b5a3e@ime1.iment.local> <085ff43e-31de-fb37-17e7-40209980f260@thelounge.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host lists.isc.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace usenet.stanford.edu 1588431793 27337 149.20.1.60 (2 May 2020 15:03:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To action@cs.stanford.edu
To bind-users@lists.isc.org
Return-Path <h.reindl@thelounge.net>
X-Original-To bind-users@lists.isc.org
Delivered-To bind-users@lists.isc.org
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0
In-Reply-To <20200502103900.189b5a3e@ime1.iment.local>
Content-Language en-US
X-Spam-Status No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mx.pao1.isc.org
X-BeenThere bind-users@lists.isc.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.29
Precedence list
List-Id BIND Users Mailing List <bind-users.lists.isc.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://lists.isc.org/mailman/options/bind-users>, <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/>
List-Post <mailto:bind-users@lists.isc.org>
List-Help <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users>, <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <085ff43e-31de-fb37-17e7-40209980f260@thelounge.net>
X-Mailman-Original-References <85af55bb-1b23-b847-3de9-ffb198bc9fb9@web.de> <20200429074035.GA91269@isc.org> <d08a148f-18f6-1972-1064-2f878b79bee2@nixmagic.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2004292100400.16665@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <8670427D-C5E5-42E3-AFEB-BA15F74E5F53@kreme.com> <39825fcf-bcd7-f38a-aeae-2fccc8df0be8@nixmagic.com> <002174a6-4025-fad1-afea-0e96f40d2ff0@thelounge.net> <20200502093032.09f4b5cf@ime1.iment.local> <dbcfcbfc-c092-88fe-f6ba-7cedfa45127d@nixmagic.com> <c1cda6ec-0f6c-4a1b-899b-8f7ea1dade43@thelounge.net> <20200502103900.189b5a3e@ime1.iment.local>
Xref csiph.com comp.protocols.dns.bind:15708

Show key headers only | View raw



Am 02.05.20 um 16:39 schrieb Paul Kosinski via bind-users:
> I wasn't complaining about port 25, I was just citing it as a
> counterexample to the claim that ISPs "must" pass all traffic.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Net_neutrality

> I think that most ISPs tell customers how to set up their email clients
> (NUAs) including what port to use. Of course it seems that now most
> people use Web based email like Gmail, Yahoo (and even Comcast/Xfinity)
> so they never see port numbers.
> 
> 
> On Sat, 2 May 2020 15:51:58 +0200
> Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net> wrote:
> 
>> Am 02.05.20 um 15:41 schrieb Michael De Roover:
>>> In my experience and from what I've heard, very few.   
>>
>> if that would be true how comes that most mail clients still default to
>> 25 for submission and years after closing port 25 on our mailserver i
>> still struggle with customers smartphones still not using 587?
>>
>> in fact 10 years ago some ISP's *tried* to kill outbound port 25 because
>> there is no point in using it from a homemachine and at that time we
>> struggeled also to explain our customers that 25 is plain wrong
>>
>> finally they gave up because the damage of open port 25 is killed with
>> dnsbl but the customer support went crazy with "why can't i send email
>> with my internet connection"
>>
>>> Even if your ISP allows it, chances are that other mail servers will reject it  
>>
>> that's a completl different story
>>
>>> On 5/2/20 3:30 PM, Paul Kosinski via bind-users wrote:  
>>>> How many ISPs allow traffic on port 25? My impression is that even many
>>>> (non-enterprise) business customers can't use port 25  

Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: DoH plugin for BIND Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net> - 2020-05-02 17:03 +0200

csiph-web