Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #15708
| Path | csiph.com!news.uzoreto.com!paganini.bofh.team!news.etla.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!usenet-its.stanford.edu!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net> |
| Newsgroups | comp.protocols.dns.bind |
| Subject | Re: DoH plugin for BIND |
| Date | Sat, 2 May 2020 17:03:00 +0200 |
| Organization | the lounge interactive design |
| Lines | 40 |
| Approved | bind-users@lists.isc.org |
| Message-ID | <mailman.331.1588431780.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> (permalink) |
| References | <85af55bb-1b23-b847-3de9-ffb198bc9fb9@web.de> <20200429074035.GA91269@isc.org> <d08a148f-18f6-1972-1064-2f878b79bee2@nixmagic.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2004292100400.16665@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <8670427D-C5E5-42E3-AFEB-BA15F74E5F53@kreme.com> <39825fcf-bcd7-f38a-aeae-2fccc8df0be8@nixmagic.com> <002174a6-4025-fad1-afea-0e96f40d2ff0@thelounge.net> <20200502093032.09f4b5cf@ime1.iment.local> <dbcfcbfc-c092-88fe-f6ba-7cedfa45127d@nixmagic.com> <c1cda6ec-0f6c-4a1b-899b-8f7ea1dade43@thelounge.net> <20200502103900.189b5a3e@ime1.iment.local> <085ff43e-31de-fb37-17e7-40209980f260@thelounge.net> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | lists.isc.org |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | usenet.stanford.edu 1588431793 27337 149.20.1.60 (2 May 2020 15:03:13 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | action@cs.stanford.edu |
| To | bind-users@lists.isc.org |
| Return-Path | <h.reindl@thelounge.net> |
| X-Original-To | bind-users@lists.isc.org |
| Delivered-To | bind-users@lists.isc.org |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <20200502103900.189b5a3e@ime1.iment.local> |
| Content-Language | en-US |
| X-Spam-Status | No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 |
| X-Spam-Checker-Version | SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mx.pao1.isc.org |
| X-BeenThere | bind-users@lists.isc.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.29 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | BIND Users Mailing List <bind-users.lists.isc.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://lists.isc.org/mailman/options/bind-users>, <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:bind-users@lists.isc.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users>, <mailto:bind-users-request@lists.isc.org?subject=subscribe> |
| X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID | <085ff43e-31de-fb37-17e7-40209980f260@thelounge.net> |
| X-Mailman-Original-References | <85af55bb-1b23-b847-3de9-ffb198bc9fb9@web.de> <20200429074035.GA91269@isc.org> <d08a148f-18f6-1972-1064-2f878b79bee2@nixmagic.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2004292100400.16665@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <8670427D-C5E5-42E3-AFEB-BA15F74E5F53@kreme.com> <39825fcf-bcd7-f38a-aeae-2fccc8df0be8@nixmagic.com> <002174a6-4025-fad1-afea-0e96f40d2ff0@thelounge.net> <20200502093032.09f4b5cf@ime1.iment.local> <dbcfcbfc-c092-88fe-f6ba-7cedfa45127d@nixmagic.com> <c1cda6ec-0f6c-4a1b-899b-8f7ea1dade43@thelounge.net> <20200502103900.189b5a3e@ime1.iment.local> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.protocols.dns.bind:15708 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Am 02.05.20 um 16:39 schrieb Paul Kosinski via bind-users: > I wasn't complaining about port 25, I was just citing it as a > counterexample to the claim that ISPs "must" pass all traffic. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Net_neutrality > I think that most ISPs tell customers how to set up their email clients > (NUAs) including what port to use. Of course it seems that now most > people use Web based email like Gmail, Yahoo (and even Comcast/Xfinity) > so they never see port numbers. > > > On Sat, 2 May 2020 15:51:58 +0200 > Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net> wrote: > >> Am 02.05.20 um 15:41 schrieb Michael De Roover: >>> In my experience and from what I've heard, very few. >> >> if that would be true how comes that most mail clients still default to >> 25 for submission and years after closing port 25 on our mailserver i >> still struggle with customers smartphones still not using 587? >> >> in fact 10 years ago some ISP's *tried* to kill outbound port 25 because >> there is no point in using it from a homemachine and at that time we >> struggeled also to explain our customers that 25 is plain wrong >> >> finally they gave up because the damage of open port 25 is killed with >> dnsbl but the customer support went crazy with "why can't i send email >> with my internet connection" >> >>> Even if your ISP allows it, chances are that other mail servers will reject it >> >> that's a completl different story >> >>> On 5/2/20 3:30 PM, Paul Kosinski via bind-users wrote: >>>> How many ISPs allow traffic on port 25? My impression is that even many >>>> (non-enterprise) business customers can't use port 25
Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: DoH plugin for BIND Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net> - 2020-05-02 17:03 +0200
csiph-web