Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming > #1367

Re: Looking for pointers on portamento

From "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org>
Newsgroups comp.programming
References <70c15ba4-d25d-42a0-8e7c-762bad6722f4@j11g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
Subject Re: Looking for pointers on portamento
Date 2012-03-16 09:01 +0000
Message-ID <wtSdnfyBZq1EYv_SnZ2dnUVZ7sSdnZ2d@bt.com> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


commodorejohn wrote:

> There seems to be surprisingly little written on the subject out
> there; I've been figuring that I might simply have to go digging
> through the source for someone else's replay routine, but I'd rather
> avoid that if possible. Does anybody have advice to offer here? Thanks
> in advance.

I can't advise on what's the "right" way to do this, but two suggestions:

Try it and see if non-linear portamento sounds any different (or any better) 
than linear.

Consider a physical model.  I'd have thought that the movements a musician 
makes as s/he slides from one note to another would probably be /fairly/ 
linear, and that the resulting frequencies would be non-linear only because the 
relation between "position" (whatever that means in context) and frequency 
would be non-linear.  Of course my assumptions may be wrong (I'm no musician), 
but my point is to consider /some/ physical model as guide to what's "right".

    -- chris 

Back to comp.programming | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

Looking for pointers on portamento commodorejohn <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2012-03-12 13:38 -0700
  Re: Looking for pointers on portamento "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2012-03-16 09:01 +0000

csiph-web