Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #1367
| From | "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| References | <70c15ba4-d25d-42a0-8e7c-762bad6722f4@j11g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> |
| Subject | Re: Looking for pointers on portamento |
| Date | 2012-03-16 09:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <wtSdnfyBZq1EYv_SnZ2dnUVZ7sSdnZ2d@bt.com> (permalink) |
commodorejohn wrote:
> There seems to be surprisingly little written on the subject out
> there; I've been figuring that I might simply have to go digging
> through the source for someone else's replay routine, but I'd rather
> avoid that if possible. Does anybody have advice to offer here? Thanks
> in advance.
I can't advise on what's the "right" way to do this, but two suggestions:
Try it and see if non-linear portamento sounds any different (or any better)
than linear.
Consider a physical model. I'd have thought that the movements a musician
makes as s/he slides from one note to another would probably be /fairly/
linear, and that the resulting frequencies would be non-linear only because the
relation between "position" (whatever that means in context) and frequency
would be non-linear. Of course my assumptions may be wrong (I'm no musician),
but my point is to consider /some/ physical model as guide to what's "right".
-- chris
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Looking for pointers on portamento commodorejohn <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2012-03-12 13:38 -0700 Re: Looking for pointers on portamento "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2012-03-16 09:01 +0000
csiph-web