Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #1579
| Date | 2012-05-16 08:57 -0700 |
|---|---|
| From | Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: identifier nomenclature |
| References | <21153887.1747.1337181462073.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynjm4> |
| Message-ID | <t6SdnYyLqfXRUy7SnZ2dnUVZ_sidnZ2d@earthlink.com> (permalink) |
On 5/16/2012 8:17 AM, bob wrote: > What are some of the most common ways to convert a set of words to an identifier? > > For instance: > > a_set_of_words > > ASetOfWords > > asetofwords > > aSetOfWords > > Which do you prefer and why? Some coding conventions use different forms for e.g. class identifiers and method identifiers. I like consistency more than I care about the exact rules, so I chose according to the first applicable rule from the following list: 1. Consistency with existing code in the same program. 2. If the language has rich APIs, match the identifier rules used in the APIs. 3. If there is a commonly used coding standard follow it. 4. In the rare case that none of the above apply, I usually just go with the same rules as in the last program I worked on. I'm more likely to remember those rules and apply them consistently than any new set of rules I make up. Patricia
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
identifier nomenclature bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2012-05-16 08:17 -0700 Re: identifier nomenclature Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-05-16 08:57 -0700 Re: identifier nomenclature Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@nbi.dk> - 2012-05-18 10:34 +0200 Re: identifier nomenclature Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-05-18 10:34 -0700
csiph-web