Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #16875
| From | ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: The Value of a 2nd Look At Code |
| Date | 2026-01-31 14:38 +0000 |
| Organization | Stefan Ram |
| Message-ID | <quality-20260131153304@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> (permalink) |
| References | <k3GdnULeTIuAG-j0nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com> <6975f968$0$28050$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <3csdR.1398925$H7H.1265376@fx13.iad> <697dd67b$0$417$426a74cc@news.free.fr> |
=?UTF-8?Q?St=C3=A9phane?= CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote or quoted: >OK, I'm not proud to have forgotten that. He was probably more speaking >about writing books than writing code, but there are a lot of >similarities in the two processes. I recently read this somewhere, was it here? "Works are not finished, they are abandoned." (or similar). >Which would be a very bad idea because people would start to put one >word by line every time it's possible |When programmers are paid by the line of code, how do you |suppose the array X[1..1000] is initialized to zero? Jon Bentley, in "Programming Pearls", Communications of the ACM, February 1986, Volume, 29 Number 2
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: The Value of a 2nd Look At Code ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2026-01-31 14:38 +0000
csiph-web