Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming > #16875

Re: The Value of a 2nd Look At Code

From ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram)
Newsgroups comp.programming
Subject Re: The Value of a 2nd Look At Code
Date 2026-01-31 14:38 +0000
Organization Stefan Ram
Message-ID <quality-20260131153304@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> (permalink)
References <k3GdnULeTIuAG-j0nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com> <6975f968$0$28050$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <3csdR.1398925$H7H.1265376@fx13.iad> <697dd67b$0$417$426a74cc@news.free.fr>

Show all headers | View raw


=?UTF-8?Q?St=C3=A9phane?= CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote or quoted:
>OK, I'm not proud to have forgotten that. He was probably more speaking
>about writing books than writing code, but there are a lot of
>similarities in the two processes.

  I recently read this somewhere, was it here?

  "Works are not finished, they are abandoned." (or similar).

>Which would be a very bad idea because people would start to put one
>word by line every time it's possible

|When programmers are paid by the line of code, how do you
|suppose the array X[1..1000] is initialized to zero?
Jon Bentley, in "Programming Pearls", Communications of the ACM,
February 1986, Volume, 29 Number 2

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: The Value of a 2nd Look At Code ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2026-01-31 14:38 +0000

csiph-web