Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #1283
| From | "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| References | <jgbtoi$vfo$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| Subject | Re: Unicode 6.1.0 released |
| Date | 2012-02-05 12:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <qNOdnbEoIMU66LPSnZ2dnUVZ8rOdnZ2d@bt.com> (permalink) |
Rui Maciel wrote:
> Unicode 6.1.0 is a minor version of the Unicode Standard and supersedes
> all previous versions. This page summarizes the important changes for the
> Unicode Standard, Version 6.1.0. In the discussion below, Version 6.1.0
> may be abbreviated as "Unicode 6.1" or "Version 6.1."
>
> http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode6.1.0/
>
>
> It appears that the main changes to the Unicode standard consist of adding
> emoticons. Does anyone know if this is really necessary?
This page
http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/Unicode-6.1/
summarises the new characters in 6.1. There are several hundred of them (I
make it 732), only 13 of which are added to the (pre-existing) Emoticons block.
But, that said, I don't see any obvious necessity to include emoticons in
Unicode -- especially /cat faces/ for God's sake!
There is probably a rationale somewhere on the Unicode site, but I couln't find
anything clear. The nearest approach was a statement from
http://unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/y2008-m12/0063.html
(which is about emoji rather than emoticions as such) to the effect that these
things are being used by phone carriers, but that there is no standard
(cross-carrier) form.
"BackgroundEmoji symbols are widely used on Japanese cell phone networks and
are encoded there as vendor-specific characters. A preliminary proposal for
encoding those symbols and criteria for unification were discussed at the
August 2007 UTC meeting. Successive refinements have been discussed in
successive UTC and subcommittee meetings. Overall, more than 600 emoji
symbols are proposed here for new encoding"
which does, I suppose, provide a rationale of sorts.
-- chris
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Unicode 6.1.0 released Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-02-01 17:45 +0000 Re: Unicode 6.1.0 released Sjouke Burry <s@b> - 2012-02-02 02:08 +0000 Re: Unicode 6.1.0 released "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2012-02-05 12:31 +0000
csiph-web