Re: If "rigid rules" are the wrong way...

Date	2012-06-07 06:43 -0700
From	Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org>
Newsgroups	comp.programming
Subject	Re: If "rigid rules" are the wrong way...
References	<aa7173cd-2019-4e33-aa93-36b9344bee21@l10g2000pbi.googlegroups.com> <CuWdnfNWK9cfwE3SnZ2dnUVZ8iudnZ2d@bt.com> <e119c7a2-596e-4c80-a4a1-6dd504b4569f@ra8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
Message-ID	<juWdnRJ8wZyOLU3SnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink.com> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On 6/7/2012 1:39 AM, mike3 wrote:
...
> However, you have to first know what perfection _IS_ to do that. How
> do you
> know what good code IS first? How can you gauge the "goodness" or
> "badness"
> of your own code?
...

Here are a couple of tests:

1. Put a piece of code away for a few weeks, then pick it up again and
try to make a change. Is it easy to make an unplanned change?

2. If you can find a study partner for your programming, periodically
swap projects. How much does your partner have to ask you about the
code, rather than reading it?

Patricia

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

If "rigid rules" are the wrong way... mike3 <mike4ty4@yahoo.com> - 2012-06-06 23:32 -0700
  Re: If "rigid rules" are the wrong way... "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2012-06-07 08:50 +0100
    Re: If "rigid rules" are the wrong way... "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-06-07 09:55 +0200
      Re: If "rigid rules" are the wrong way... "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2012-06-09 11:25 +0100
    Re: If "rigid rules" are the wrong way... mike3 <mike4ty4@yahoo.com> - 2012-06-07 01:39 -0700
      Re: If "rigid rules" are the wrong way... Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-06-07 06:43 -0700
      Re: If "rigid rules" are the wrong way... "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2012-06-09 11:05 +0100
        Re: If "rigid rules" are the wrong way... "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2012-06-09 11:24 +0100
      Re: If "rigid rules" are the wrong way... "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2012-06-09 11:15 +0100
    Re: If "rigid rules" are the wrong way... "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-06-07 10:55 +0100
      Re: If "rigid rules" are the wrong way... "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2012-06-09 10:44 +0100
        Re: If "rigid rules" are the wrong way... "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-06-09 12:35 +0100
  Re: If "rigid rules" are the wrong way... Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-06-07 09:38 -0700
    Re: If "rigid rules" are the wrong way... mike3 <mike4ty4@yahoo.com> - 2012-06-07 14:26 -0700
      Re: If "rigid rules" are the wrong way... Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-06-07 16:52 -0700

csiph-web