Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #1575
| From | "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads, comp.programming |
| Subject | About parallelhashlist.. |
| Date | 2012-05-16 11:40 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <jp0hqh$fog$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Hello, If you look at parallelhashlist in: http://pages.videotron.com/aminer/ Even if i use lock striping for the hash chains in parallelhashlist, synchronizing access to the counter reintroduces the scalability problems of exclusive locking. In this case, the counter is called a hot field because every mutative operation needs to access it. So my next step is to split the global counter to many local counters... also i am using a readewritelock in every chain, so my next step also is to lower the number of readwritelocks to consume also less memory... Thank you. Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
About parallelhashlist.. "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> - 2012-05-16 11:40 -0500
Re: About parallelhashlist.. "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> - 2012-05-16 11:43 -0500
Re: About parallelhashlist.. "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> - 2012-05-16 11:47 -0500
Re: About parallelhashlist.. "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> - 2012-05-16 11:55 -0500
csiph-web