Re: About divisions on the Taylor series in the error function

From	hopcode <hopcode@invalid.de>
Newsgroups	comp.programming
Subject	Re: About divisions on the Taylor series in the error function
Date	2012-04-11 04:33 +0200
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<jm2qi3$5cc$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<jlur7p$42p$1@dont-email.me> <tcf6o7hml1brnlqiq2rr7h2p9ipdibshfk@4ax.com> <jm00rj$5ju$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

Thank you all
for your excellent suggestions.
it seems Chebyshev wins of some lenghts
above all methods, whenever all of them are
very SSE doable.

Cheers,

-- 
.:mrk[hopcode]
   .:x64lab:.
  group http://groups.google.com/group/x64lab
  site http://sites.google.com/site/x64lab

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

About divisions on the Taylor series in the error function hopcode <hopcode@invalid.de> - 2012-04-09 16:20 +0200
  Re: About divisions on the Taylor series in the error function Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-09 14:52 -0500
    Re: About divisions on the Taylor series in the error function hopcode <hopcode@invalid.de> - 2012-04-10 03:02 +0200
      Re: About divisions on the Taylor series in the error function "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-04-10 10:14 +0200
      Re: About divisions on the Taylor series in the error function "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-04-10 09:28 +0100
      Re: About divisions on the Taylor series in the error function hopcode <hopcode@invalid.de> - 2012-04-11 04:33 +0200
  Re: About divisions on the Taylor series in the error function Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-04-11 10:07 +0100
    Re: About divisions on the Taylor series in the error function hopcode <hopcode@nospicedham.invalid.de> - 2012-04-12 11:07 +0200

csiph-web