Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #1295
| From | Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: What makes a programming language popular? |
| Date | 2012-02-07 18:34 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <jgrqru$juc$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <jgnq6s$1b2$1@news.albasani.net> <d800b5dec0bb43c208e6312666440676@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> |
Fritz Wuehler wrote: > The most obvious factor is what is the OS and its interface written in? This is irrelevant. If this was the case then no interpreted language would ever have succeeded. Yet, Java is one of the most popular programming languages, along with perl, PHP and python. > If > not for UNIX being written in C with an interface defined in C header > files, C wouldn't have seen the light of day outside Bell Labs. This is stupid. A group of smart people took the time to design and develop a new programming language because at that time no other programming language successfully scratched the itch they needed scratching. As the world was packed with people who also wanted to scratch that particular itch, the C programming language quickly took off. This has absolutely nothing to do with UNIX or "C header files". >> some factors: >> familiarity, how much does it look like what people already know and >> like? > > Historically irrelevant, now probably very relevant. What do you mean by "historically"? One of the reasons behind the success of programming languages such as C++, Java, C#, javascript and others is how they managed to become familiar by copying the syntax of the C programming language. >> what merits does it bring versus existing options? > > Irrelevant. What do you need to use to get the job done in environment X? > That is what you will choose whether the language itself is good or bad. The main reason that defines if a particular programming language is good or bad is if gets the job done and how well it does the job when compared with alternatives. Therefore, why can you claim it is irrelevant? > The answer for UNIX-eunichs is always C How do you explain the multitude of software developed to run on UNIX and unix-like OSs that is actually developed in languages other than C? Rui Maciel
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
What makes a programming language popular? Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@sacrideo.us> - 2012-02-05 19:33 -0600
Re: What makes a programming language popular? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-05 22:57 -0700
Re: What makes a programming language popular? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201202.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2012-02-07 18:12 +0100
Re: What makes a programming language popular? Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-02-07 18:34 +0000
Re: What makes a programming language popular? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-07 15:25 -0700
Re: What makes a programming language popular? tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2012-02-06 23:27 -0800
Re: What makes a programming language popular? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-07 15:53 -0700
Re: What makes a programming language popular? gremnebulin <peterdjones@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-08 04:07 -0800
Re: What makes a programming language popular? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-08 17:15 -0700
Second Best Language Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@sacrideo.us> - 2012-02-08 20:19 -0600
Re: Second Best Language BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-08 21:27 -0700
Re: What makes a programming language popular? gremnebulin <peterdjones@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-08 04:05 -0800
csiph-web