Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #16148
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: Another little puzzle |
| Date | 2022-12-25 01:55 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <875ye0p7qg.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <87wn6krsc5.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <868riwzxu3.fsf@linuxsc.com> <to7ar5$aqn$1@gioia.aioe.org> <875ye0qvs0.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <to83un$3ps$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> writes: > ... But actually the balancing line idea wasn't my proper thinking - > that was that we "counter-balanced" the circle by adding a new weight > somewhere on the circle. There is a unique such place where such a > weight can go, and a unique weight that works. Or just find the point in the (weightless) disc where it balances. That's the vector average. > The "average" for the > x_i is then directly OPPOSITE the counter weight. This is all > assuming we don't start with an exactly balancing sample! > The mass of > the counter-weight is the magnitude of your vector sum, indicating the > "strength" of the average... The distance from the centre is then a measure of the strength of the average. I like the physical metaphor of a balanced disc, but I prefer the idea of finding the balance point directly rather than the mass and location (on the circumference) of a counterweight. -- Ben.
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Another little puzzle Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-12-21 13:17 -0800
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-12-22 04:10 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-12-24 06:21 -0800
Re: Another little puzzle Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2022-12-24 16:53 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2022-12-24 17:14 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-12-24 22:30 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2022-12-25 00:02 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-12-25 01:30 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-12-25 01:55 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-12-25 00:37 -0800
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-12-25 00:41 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-12-25 01:05 -0800
Re: Another little puzzle Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-12-25 09:30 -0800
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-12-25 21:44 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-12-25 17:59 -0500
Re: Another little puzzle Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-12-25 18:39 -0800
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-12-26 03:18 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-12-25 18:35 -0800
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-12-26 03:49 +0000
csiph-web