Re: true loop

Path	csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date	Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:04:01 -0500
Message-ID	<505106D1.10CD@mindspring.com> (permalink)
Date	Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:04:01 -0400
From	pete <pfiland@mindspring.com>
Reply-To	pfiland@mindspring.com
Organization	PF
X-Mailer	Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; I)
MIME-Version	1.0
Newsgroups	comp.programming
Subject	Re: true loop
References	<d7cd0c38-525c-4796-98e4-4a068d91846c@googlegroups.com> <504FC54B.7D2@mindspring.com> <5875d198-0e6b-4075-94a0-d7c56a9a4386@gq8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Lines	31
X-Usenet-Provider	http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host	4.156.228.203
X-Trace	sv3-PZio13/i44RJ9RQ0gjIf3bdHAdqhXvjt3xonnJ8UbCS9LGfNLYETYzeVTkAgDo9wGVOyVo5BIH9oSvt!DxxH2QlPA9gRz10fvugjLnq4Kwb3t19O8Z1pf95sJRJcp5ctkaGQ4CvlD+b45QC5fYS1kA1CWxFh!XJB1/Tq5oRQ=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter	1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes	1844
Xref	csiph.com comp.programming:2202

Show key headers only | View raw

Nick Keighley wrote:
> 
> On Sep 12, 12:12 am, pete <pfil...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> > bob wrote:
> >
> > > Is it considered bad practice to do something like this?
> >
> > > while (true)
> > > {
> > > ...
> > > }
> >
> > Th C compiler which I use,
> > issues a warning for that.
> >
> > In C,
> >     for(;;)
> > is for writing that kind of loop.
> 
> in what sense is it "for writing that kind of loop"? 

In the sense that it is only only loop style,
which is explicitly described by the guy who invented it,
as being an "'infinite' loop", in both editions of K&R.

It's also the loop style 
which is used for all of the examples of "infinite" loops, 
in the C standard.

-- 
pete

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

true loop bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2012-09-11 10:52 -0700
  Re: true loop Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-09-11 11:17 -0700
  Re: true loop pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-09-11 19:12 -0400
    Re: true loop Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-09-11 16:28 -0700
      Re: true loop pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-09-11 22:23 -0400
      Re: true loop Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-09-11 19:33 -0700
        Re: true loop Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-09-11 19:53 -0700
        Re: true loop Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-12 02:23 -0700
      Re: true loop "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2012-09-15 10:56 +0100
    Re: true loop Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-12 02:21 -0700
      Re: true loop pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-09-12 18:04 -0400
        Re: true loop Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-13 10:22 +1200
          Re: true loop Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-09-12 19:06 -0700
  Re: true loop Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2012-09-13 16:27 +0200
    Re: true loop Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-19 07:04 -0700
      Re: true loop Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-09-19 07:30 -0700

csiph-web