Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #16863
| From | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: The Big List Of Naughty Strings |
| Date | 2025-09-04 01:21 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <109apjd$1g9bk$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <109apeu$1g949$1@dont-email.me> |
On Thu, 4 Sep 2025 01:19:26 -0000 (UTC), I wrote: > The “walks into a bar” reference is to this > <http://www.sempf.net/post/On-Testing1>: > > QA Engineer walks into a bar. Orders a beer. Orders 0 beers. Orders > 999999999 beers. Orders a lizard. Orders -1 beers. Orders a > sfdeljknesv. > > Because that’s what testing is all about... Why did that suddenly come to mind? Because I just read about this incident where someone got the AI at a fast-food drive-through to accept an order for 18,000 cups of water <https://www.zdnet.com/article/someone-ordered-18000-cups-of-water-at-an-ai-drive-thru-now-fast-food-chains-are-reconsidering/>. Debugging actual human-written code is hard enough; how do you debug an AI?
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
The Big List Of Naughty Strings Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-04 01:19 +0000 Re: The Big List Of Naughty Strings Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-04 01:21 +0000
csiph-web