Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #1121
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!dedekind.zen.co.uk!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!reader01.nrc01.news.zen.net.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> |
| Subject | Re: Safe accesses of global arrays in signal handlers? |
| Date | Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:37:07 +0100 |
| User-Agent | Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing moment of clarity.) |
| Message-Id | <pan.2012.09.29.19.37.07.356000@nowhere.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads, comp.unix.programmer |
| References | <accvmcFog2gU1@mid.individual.net> <pan.2012.09.25.11.15.59.228000@nowhere.com> <acik2gF3panU1@mid.individual.net> <pan.2012.09.27.12.35.52.872000@nowhere.com> <aclh4pFol46U1@mid.individual.net> <pan.2012.09.28.17.26.06.856000@nowhere.com> <aco59lFcohrU1@mid.individual.net> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Lines | 22 |
| Organization | Zen Internet |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 31268699.news.zen.co.uk |
| X-Trace | DXC=JRT0>1L[g60Z][238HZlA>a0UP_O8AJo<=dR0\ckLKG0WeZ<[7LZNR6Ea?<ZN3Q`\<M2Z^cWRFGA;EnKChLY03H2 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@zen.co.uk |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.programming.threads:1121 comp.unix.programmer:3379 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:44:50 +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: >> Yes. write() is async-signal-safe, so one thread can do a blocking read() >> and the signal handler can use write() to wake it. > > Thanks for your feedback. > > Do you see any difficulties or software design challenges for proper > handling of the situation that more data is written into the pipe than > the receiving thread can read and process in a timely manner? The signal handler only needs to write one byte at a time; the receiving thread can read a pipe-full at a time. If the receiving thread does nothing but notify worker threads or enqueue messages, there shouldn't be a problem. But you have a similar issue with the signals themselves. If non-realtime signals are generated faster than they are handled, pending signals aren't guaranteed to be queued, i.e. the handler may only be invoked once for multiple signals.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Safe accesses of global arrays in signal handlers? Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> - 2012-09-25 08:01 +0200
Re: Safe accesses of global arrays in signal handlers? Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-09-25 12:15 +0100
Re: Safe accesses of global arrays in signal handlers? Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> - 2012-09-27 11:20 +0200
Re: Safe accesses of global arrays in signal handlers? Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-09-27 13:23 +0100
Re: Safe accesses of global arrays in signal handlers? Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> - 2012-09-28 13:25 +0200
Re: Safe accesses of global arrays in signal handlers? Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-09-27 13:35 +0100
Re: Safe accesses of global arrays in signal handlers? Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> - 2012-09-28 13:48 +0200
Re: Safe accesses of global arrays in signal handlers? Johann Klammer <klammerj@NOSPAM.a1.net> - 2012-09-28 18:34 +0200
Re: Safe accesses of global arrays in signal handlers? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2012-09-28 17:54 +0000
Re: Safe accesses of global arrays in signal handlers? Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-09-28 18:26 +0100
Re: Safe accesses of global arrays in signal handlers? Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> - 2012-09-29 13:44 +0200
Re: Safe accesses of global arrays in signal handlers? Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-09-29 20:37 +0100
Re: Safe accesses of global arrays in signal handlers? William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> - 2012-09-29 17:31 -0700
Signal handlers writing into pipes Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> - 2012-09-30 13:21 +0200
Re: Safe accesses of global arrays in signal handlers? Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-10-01 18:04 +0100
Signal handlers writing into pipes Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> - 2012-10-03 16:36 +0200
Re: Signal handlers writing into pipes Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-10-03 17:07 +0100
Re: Safe accesses of global arrays in signal handlers? Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> - 2012-09-30 13:12 +0200
Re: Safe accesses of global arrays in signal handlers? Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-09-30 20:46 +0100
Re: Safe accesses of global arrays in signal handlers? Geoff Clare <geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid> - 2012-09-28 13:39 +0100
Re: Safe accesses of global arrays in signal handlers? Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> - 2012-09-29 13:15 +0200
Re: Safe accesses of global arrays in signal handlers? William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> - 2012-09-29 17:42 -0700
Re: Safe accesses of global arrays in signal handlers? Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> - 2012-09-30 14:04 +0200
Re: Safe accesses of global arrays in signal handlers? Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2012-09-25 13:27 +0100
csiph-web