Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming.threads > #3729

Here is my political model

Show all headers | View raw

Hello........


I will add the following factor to my model:

Economic integration with others and also economic investment render the 
world more stable and more peaceful and more secure, and because 
consumerism has to guide governance and consumerism is also the 
consequence of compassion and respect, because to not hurt consumer 
confidence index you have to know how to be compassion and respect. This 
is the solution of the problem between Israel and arab countries, they 
must have more economic integration and more economic investment between 
them to be more peace and stability.

Please read again the rest of my model:

With a Top-down approach i have come to an important subject:

I have said that:

Other than that you have to know how to tune compassion and respect to 
not hurt consummer confidence index internationally and locally.

This is an important factor to be able to tune well the political 
philosophy that must guide governance, you have also to think governance 
by knowing how to tune investing into the third world countries, this is 
mandatory, to be more precise i will say that you have to know that like 
Fordism, consumerism has also to guide our political philosophy, and 
consumerism is a consequence of respect and compassion, so this is very 
serious, and the essence of America is constructed on this fact, so 
adding this principal to my model will get you on the right path, here 
is the rest of my model that i have enhanced:

About extremist nationalism and communism..

Extremist nationalism like the far-right or neo-nazi political parties 
is an archaic thinking that causes violence and extremism and 
instability, communism is the same, so we have to be wiser
and understand that this kind of extremism has also to be avoided
by knowing the following:

  "The economic models developed by the development economists of the 
1960s, based on the idea of industrializing industries, seem to be 
losing more and more of their unconditional supporters. The economic 
development of a country or a region is no longer Dependent on the 
development of the secondary sector or heavy industry. "
by M'Fadel El Halaissi, of which our readers are familiar, is Deputy 
Chief Executive Officer of BMCE Bank.

Please read more here(you have to translate it from french to english, 
because it is in french), it's from the Economist Magazine in Morocco
my country:

http://www.leconomiste.com/article/915791-la-conqu-te-conomique-de-l-afrique-passe-par-le-secteur-des-servicespar-m-fadel-el-ha


And i have said that efficient thinking is not thinking small..

Efficient thinking is thinking bigger..

You have to think bigger to be able to survive better..

But thinking bigger is not suicidal thinking that causes suffer to
the people, suicidal thinking is a nihilist thinking that is not
efficient thinking that thinks bigger and that solves problems,
so be capable and be responsable and be wise, being wiser is also taking 
into account the right variables and factors that enhance your living 
conditions and the living conditions of your children and the people..

So here is again my model that i have enhanced:

But we can not have confidence in people, we have to enforce
morality with laws, but morality is not something easy ,
because morality is not just a priori pure moral, morality
is infered also from empirical moral that is also from power and 
counter-power, but we are more lucky today because empirical moral is 
not so bad, because i have said that: Past was the past, but today it is 
different, we are getting world stability from the power and the 
counter-power, so we not just have governance and/or democracy that is 
the power of people, but also we have the counter-power of the financial 
and banks institutions that have there rating methodology that take into 
account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, and we 
have the counter-power of the consummers confidence index, and this 
creates a world stability because we have to optimize our economic 
systems and by being responsable by being also responsable governance, 
other than that compassion and respect can be virility and they are like 
mandatory for the system, because compassion and respect gets us more 
organized because neglecting compassion and respect cause violence and 
extremism that make our society unstable and less optimized ,  so tuning 
compassion and respect right with social services and medical services 
and with educational services and with help to the people to avoid 
violence and extremisme is also more stability and more power , so this 
compassion and respect is virility, other than that you have to know how 
to tune compassion and respect to not hurt consummer confidence index 
internationally and locally.


And about immigration:

Virility and usefulness

We have to do more philosophy..

There is some of you who define virility as being courageous or violent..

But this is not the right way to define virility..

You have to define it to know it:

Virility is maturity and also it is intelligence and it is
money and it is knowledge and it is efficiency etc.

Virility is not just being violent or being courageous..

Now can we make this criterion of virility the criterion
at how we have to be selected as an immigrant ?

I don't think it is the right way..

Because to be accepted as an immigrant we have to be categorized
by the criterion of usefulness, this is optimization of today,
so to fulfil the goal of economic growth and economic efficiency
and to be able to give jobs to the right persons, we have to think
by the criterion of usefulness, this is how works USA and this is
how works Canada too, even if we select some immigrants taking also into 
consideration human rights.

Knowledge changes your perception..

But quality of knowledge is also very important to set it right..

To overcome many constrains you have to know how to tune some
variables, like you have to know how to define usefulness,
and this is the weakness of neo-nazis like ideologies,
today optimization is defined by the criterion of usefulness,
and usefulness is not that arabs have to be as beautiful as
white europeans, this is the old way of thinking, so
usefulness to conform to the standards of today that
take into account efficiency of economy has been defined
differently than the neo-nazis kind of thinking, so
we have to adapt , because USA and Canada have to
optimize there economies taking into account many
constrains, because also usefulness is constrained
also by contrains and this is why USA and Canada
are getting more clever at defining usefulness and usefulness of
immigrants to better optimize there economies, so i am calling
to all of you to adapt to the reality of today, because
the past was the past, and today is today, so please adapt
yourself !

And more about the criterion of usefulness..

Optimization today is defined by usefulness..

But do you think that usefulness can be tuned exactly ?

No Sir, usefulness is constrained by some constrains that
make tuning of usefulness more an approximation than
an exact calculation, this is the weakness of the
far-right and neo-nazis kind of ideologies, you have
to know that tuning usefulness is still an approximation,
and this approximation sets optimization that sets
immigration.

So don't be immature and adapt yourself to today and to science !


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Here is my political model rami17 <rami17@rami17.net> - 2017-04-09 12:31 -0400

csiph-web