Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #1942
| From | aminer <aminer@toto.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads, comp.programming |
| Subject | Omnithread... |
| Date | 2013-10-21 14:03 -0700 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <l43q9k$dm3$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Hello again, Other than that i have noticed that the OmniThread library(from htttp://otl.17slon.com/ ) is using a lockfree queue , so it not FIFO fair , hence it's also not starvation-free, and i think it's not scalable and it's bad, cause the Omnithread's lockfree queue generates too much cache-coherence traffic under contention, this is so bad. This is why i have implemented a concurrent FIFO queue that minimizes efficiently the cache-coherence traffic and that is FIFO fair and that is more energy efficient on the pop() size: it will not spin-wait when there is no items in the queue, and i have used my concurrent FIFO queue inside my Threadpool engine. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar
Omnithread... aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2013-10-21 14:03 -0700
csiph-web