Groups > comp.programming.threads > #1896

Re: Lockfree or not to lockfree..

From	aminer <aminer@toto.net>
Newsgroups	comp.programming.threads, comp.programming
Subject	Re: Lockfree or not to lockfree..
Date	2013-10-10 15:45 -0700
Organization	albasani.net
Message-ID	<l3704m$qub$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink)
References	<l36ve6$pdq$1@news.albasani.net>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 10/10/2013 3:33 PM, aminer wrote:
> Lockfree algorithms on the other hand can have too much cache-cohency
> traffic, much more than Lockfre based algorithms that uses scalable Locks

I mean:

Lockfree algorithms on the other hand can have too much cache-cohence
traffic, much more than Lock based algorithms that uses scalable Locks.

Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Lockfree or not to lockfree.. aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2013-10-10 15:33 -0700
  Re: Lockfree or not to lockfree.. aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2013-10-10 15:45 -0700
  Re: Lockfree or not to lockfree.. aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2013-10-10 16:09 -0700
  Re: Lockfree or not to lockfree.. "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> - 2013-10-10 14:35 -0700

csiph-web