Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #1763
| From | aminer <aminer@toto.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads, comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: About my Scalable distributed Lock... |
| Date | 2013-09-30 12:17 -0700 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <l2c86g$4ff$4@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <l2c7vh$4ff$1@news.albasani.net> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Hello, You can download my scalable distributed Lock version 1.0 from: http://pages.videotron.com/aminer/ Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. On 9/30/2013 12:13 PM, aminer wrote: > > Hello, > > > We have to be very carefull, i have benchmaked my Scalable distributed Lock > version 1.1, and i have noticed that since it uses a Ticket mechanism it > doesn't scale, the problem with the Ticket mechanism is that it has a > poor performance cause in the case of a spinlock without tickets when it > is unlocked() the first thread that comes first to the lock() will enter > immediatly the locked section, but that's not the case with a Ticket > spinlock cause if the first thread that enters the lock() first has not > the ticket to enter, the other thread that have the ticket to enter and > that is waiting for his turn will wait longer/more, if there is > also context switches it will wait longer, so this is why the Ticket > spinlock has a poor performance compared to a simple spinlock with a > backoff, so i have decided to return back my scalable distributed Lock > version 1.0, the version 1.0 doesn't use a ticket mechanism but it > is much fair that the Windows critical section , other than that > i have benchmarked the Windows critical section and i have noticed that > it doesn't scale well , my scalable distributed Lock scales much better > , also my scalable distributed Lock spins on local variable so it reduces > the cache misses and it reduces the cache-coherence traffic, the Windows > critical section spins on a local variable so it's less efficient than > my scalable distributed Lock. > > > > Thank you, > Amine Moulay Ramdane. > > > > > >
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
About my Scalable distributed Lock... aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2013-09-30 12:13 -0700 Re: About my Scalable distributed Lock... aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2013-09-30 12:17 -0700 Re: About my Scalable distributed Lock... aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2013-09-30 12:20 -0700
csiph-web