Groups > comp.programming.threads > #1233

Re: About Parallel sort library....

From	Gerald Breuer <Gerald.Breuer@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.programming.threads
Subject	Re: About Parallel sort library....
Date	2012-11-15 18:28 +0100
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<k838ot$4k3$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<k795jv$dr5$1@dont-email.me> <k7bv84$d6t$1@speranza.aioe.org> <k7bvlo$ebr$1@speranza.aioe.org> <k7c9t1$cg5$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

Am 07.11.2012 02:27, schrieb aminer:

> You can still do many things with threads and with threadpools,
> that's what i did, and i am happy with that.

Threadpools make sense when the CPU-time consumed by the thread is
in the magnitude of the time to create a thread through the kernel;
when the CPU-time is a higher, creating a thread rather doesn't hurt.
As you can't know which amount of data your algorithms operate on
you can't know the runtime so you can't know if using thread-pools
is generally appropriate.

Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

About Parallel sort library.... "aminer" <aminer@toto.com> - 2012-11-05 14:55 -0600
  Re: About Parallel sort library.... Gerald Breuer <Gerald.Breuer@googlemail.com> - 2012-11-06 22:25 +0100
    Re: About Parallel sort library.... Gerald Breuer <Gerald.Breuer@googlemail.com> - 2012-11-06 22:32 +0100
      Re: About Parallel sort library.... "aminer" <aminer@toto.com> - 2012-11-06 19:27 -0600
        Re: About Parallel sort library.... Gerald Breuer <Gerald.Breuer@googlemail.com> - 2012-11-07 03:21 +0100
        Re: About Parallel sort library.... Gerald Breuer <Gerald.Breuer@googlemail.com> - 2012-11-15 18:28 +0100
      Re: About Parallel sort library.... Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2012-11-16 11:46 +0100
    Re: About Parallel sort library.... "aminer" <aminer@toto.com> - 2012-11-06 19:25 -0600

csiph-web