Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming.threads > #1035

Re: Parallelsort and parallelquicksort have been updated

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Patricia wrote
> I don't understand why this particular library is considered so
> important and widely used that its updates need to be announced in
> comp.programming.

Patricia, as you have noticed no one is writing any more on
this newsgroup and i think it's not so horrible to post thos few 
annoucements
here, cause as you have noticed it's just a few annoucemts and that's all.

And remember that all my parallel libraries are free,
so It's all about generousity Patricia..




Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdne.






"Patricia Shanahan" <pats@acm.org> wrote in message 
news:tuKdnatIEKAi16fNnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@earthlink.com...
> On 8/25/2012 11:15 AM, Wally W. wrote:
>> On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 22:36:03 +0200, Gerald Breuer wrote:
>>
>>> Am 24.08.2012 20:47, schrieb BartC:
>>>
>>>>> Maybe, but Pascal is about 1% on the TIOBE-Index.
>>>
>>>> Who cares? If most people want to behave like sheep and use
>>>> flawed tools just because everyone else does, then let them.
>>>
>>> That's subjective what's flawed or not. And I can live f.e. with the
>>> flaws of C++ for the countervalue of powerful language features like
>>> templates.
>>> If aminer wants others to use his algorithms he should provide them
>>> in a language that this people use.
>>
>> If he wants others to use his algorithms in Pascal, he is doing
>> exactly the right thing; generously, in fact.
>
> I would agree if he were posting to a Pascal newsgroup, especially if it
> were one that is designated for software announcements.
>
> I don't understand why this particular library is considered so
> important and widely used that its updates need to be announced in
> comp.programming.
>
> Patricia
> 

Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Parallelsort and parallelquicksort have been updated "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> - 2012-08-23 09:27 -0500
  Re: Parallelsort and parallelquicksort have been updated Gerald Breuer <Gerald.Breuer@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-23 17:43 +0200
    Re: Parallelsort and parallelquicksort have been updated Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2012-08-24 06:17 -0400
      Re: Parallelsort and parallelquicksort have been updated Gerald Breuer <Gerald.Breuer@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-24 19:24 +0200
        Re: Parallelsort and parallelquicksort have been updated "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-08-24 19:47 +0100
          Re: Parallelsort and parallelquicksort have been updated Gerald Breuer <Gerald.Breuer@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-24 22:36 +0200
            Re: Parallelsort and parallelquicksort have been updated Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2012-08-25 14:15 -0400
              Re: Parallelsort and parallelquicksort have been updated Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2012-08-25 21:10 +0200
                Re: Parallelsort and parallelquicksort have been updated Toby Douglass <a@b.com> - 2012-09-10 09:43 +0200
              Re: Parallelsort and parallelquicksort have been updated Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-08-26 09:11 -0700
                Re: Parallelsort and parallelquicksort have been updated "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> - 2012-08-26 13:12 -0500
                Re: Parallelsort and parallelquicksort have been updated "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> - 2012-08-26 13:13 -0500

csiph-web