Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #957
| From | "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads, comp.programming |
| Subject | About lockfree_mpmc ... |
| Date | 2012-07-22 18:22 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <juhuet$ort$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Hello all,
I think i have discovered a problem with lockfree_mpmc:
You will find the source code of lockfree_mpmc at:
http://pages.videotron.com/aminer/
So please follow with me:
If you take a look at the lockfree_mpmc , here is the source code
of the push() method:
---
function TLockfree_MPMC.push(tm : tNodeQueue):boolean;
var lasttail,newtemp:long;
i,j:integer;
begin
if getlength >= fsize
then
begin
result:=false;
exit;
end;
result:=true;
newTemp:=LockedIncLong(temp);
[1] lastTail:=newTemp-1;
[2] setObject(lastTail,tm);
repeat
if CAS(tail,lasttail,newtemp)
then
begin
exit;
end;
sleep(0);
until false;
end;
---
As you know in the x86 architecture Loads may be reordered with older stores
to different locations.
So in line [2] there is a load of tail and lasttail to the registers of the
processor
before calling setobject() and just before on line [1] there is a store to
lasttail.
So as you have noticed the processor can then reorder the loads on line [2]
with the older
store on line [1] and this will cause a problem, so i think i have to insert
a load between
line [1] and line [2].
What do you think ?
Sincerely,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar
About lockfree_mpmc ... "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> - 2012-07-22 18:22 -0500
csiph-web