Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #1361
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-14 18:52 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <cfd2e5c1-5c00-4ebb-9da1-a3588dc41d79@w14g2000vba.googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Are detached threads useful? |
| From | Michael Podolsky <michael.podolsky.69@gmail.com> |
Hello All, I have a general feeling that to detach a thread is a bad idea. Detaching threads allows us not to register some threads in some containers, but that operation should be very cheep. It saves us from long waiting on join operation... but implementing effective join operations on a number of threads is anyway an essential task We pay for using detached threads by producing shaky designs (what was ok to terminate today may be not ok tomorrow when we change some thread functionality). In short, I declare "detached threads should not be used". And I would like to hear about examples where having them is really a good (or even necessary?) idea. Thank you, Michael
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Are detached threads useful? Michael Podolsky <michael.podolsky.69@gmail.com> - 2013-02-14 18:52 -0800
Re: Are detached threads useful? Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2013-02-16 11:00 +0100
Re: Are detached threads useful? andrew@cucumber.demon.co.uk (Andrew Gabriel) - 2013-03-02 15:16 +0000
Re: Are detached threads useful? Michael Podolsky <michael.podolsky.69@gmail.com> - 2013-03-07 22:27 -0800
Re: Are detached threads useful? andrew@cucumber.demon.co.uk (Andrew Gabriel) - 2013-03-18 14:57 +0000
Re: Are detached threads useful? Gerald Breuer <Gerald.Breuer@googlemail.com> - 2013-03-08 19:11 +0100
csiph-web