Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #2133
| Date | 2014-04-01 12:37 -0500 |
|---|---|
| From | Robert Miles <milesrf@Usenet-News.net> |
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads, comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: More on scalability |
| References | <lgavev$anb$1@news.albasani.net> |
| Message-ID | <533af93b$0$44376$862e30e2@ngroups.net> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 3/19/2014 12:29 AM, aminer wrote: > > Hello, > > "NUMA attempts to address this problem by providing separate memory > for each processor" > > So to scale Databases or AVL trees or Red Black trees up to the > scalability upper limit of my scalable RWLocks you can use a NUMA > architecture, NUMA architecture is like distributed databases over > many computers but into a single computer , you can distribute your > database in each separate memory for each processor on a NUMA > architecture. So that the reader section of my scalable RWLock will > take advantage of that and so that your Database scales up to the > scalability upper limit of my scalable RWLocks. > > So now the problem is solved beautifully. > > > Amine Moulay Ramdane. > > If you want such a processor to work well for multi-threaded programs using multiple CPU cores, you'll also need to provide a section of memory shared among the CPU cores, to allow the cores a reasonable speed of communicating with each other.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
More on scalability aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2014-03-18 22:29 -0700
Re: More on scalability Robert Miles <milesrf@Usenet-News.net> - 2014-04-01 12:37 -0500
Re: More on scalability Lucas Levrel <lucas.levrel@u-pec.fr> - 2014-04-02 11:46 +0200
csiph-web