Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming.threads > #2133

Re: More on scalability

Date 2014-04-01 12:37 -0500
From Robert Miles <milesrf@Usenet-News.net>
Newsgroups comp.programming.threads, comp.programming
Subject Re: More on scalability
References <lgavev$anb$1@news.albasani.net>
Message-ID <533af93b$0$44376$862e30e2@ngroups.net> (permalink)

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 3/19/2014 12:29 AM, aminer wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> "NUMA attempts to address this problem by providing separate memory 
> for each processor"
>
> So to  scale  Databases or AVL trees or Red Black trees up to the 
> scalability upper limit of my scalable RWLocks you can use a NUMA 
> architecture, NUMA architecture is like distributed databases over 
> many computers but into a single computer , you can distribute your 
> database in each separate memory for each processor on a NUMA 
> architecture. So that the reader section of my scalable RWLock will 
> take advantage of that and so that your Database scales up to the  
> scalability upper limit of my scalable RWLocks.
>
> So now the problem is solved beautifully.
>
>
> Amine Moulay Ramdane.
>
>
If you want such a processor to work well for multi-threaded programs 
using multiple CPU cores, you'll also need to provide a section of 
memory shared among the CPU cores, to allow the cores a reasonable speed 
of communicating with each other.

Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

More on scalability aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2014-03-18 22:29 -0700
  Re: More on scalability Robert Miles <milesrf@Usenet-News.net> - 2014-04-01 12:37 -0500
    Re: More on scalability Lucas Levrel <lucas.levrel@u-pec.fr> - 2014-04-02 11:46 +0200

csiph-web