Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.rsts > #156

Re: Cobol on RSTS/E V10

From bill <bill.gunshannon@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.rsts
Subject Re: Cobol on RSTS/E V10
Date 2023-11-15 11:03 -0500
Message-ID <krk8eiF2ggeU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <9c76ae26-5c78-4afa-a192-d6bdba31d3b9n@googlegroups.com> <uivdmk$ppk$1@news.misty.com> <6a79f306-af59-4b28-bd25-67c54a27f570n@googlegroups.com> <kri7f9FisnuU4@mid.individual.net> <eb7bbd7f-9f98-4067-96e3-1fd089448d7an@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 11/14/2023 8:16 PM, S Johnson wrote:
> 
>> I had to manually move C81ODL.TSK and C81RFM.TSK from [1,2] to
>> [0,55]. Then it worked just fine. Except I am find some strange
>> behavior in the compiler.
>>
>> bill
> 
> What kind of strange behavior?  I haven't really gotten into C81 hard yet, but compiled a simple Hello world program fine.  I do notice that terminal cursor placement (DISPLAY-AT) isn't always the same on different devices.  On the simh console set as VT100, it works properly, a terminal connected via putty to the DZ device prints the escape sequence.  Still puzzling that one out.  It may be a configuration issue with the DZ connections.  I've got a few other irons in the fire developing a printer emulator etc so this really isn't a serious priority.

Well, maybe not strange, really, but interesting.
The name of the program apparently gets put in the symbol table so
if it shows up later as data item ( or in my case a paragraph name )
it is already defined.  And, another is the WITH CONVERSION option
is needed where in more modern compilers like GnuCOBOL it is accepted
but is only seen as a comment.

I am sure there are others but nothing standard violating just
different.  I always have fun trying COBOL programs on different
systems to see what is need to port them.

bill

Back to comp.os.rsts | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Cobol on RSTS/E V10 S Johnson <westdalefarmer@gmail.com> - 2023-11-13 14:00 -0800
  Re: Cobol on RSTS/E V10 S Johnson <westdalefarmer@gmail.com> - 2023-11-13 17:13 -0800
  Re: Cobol on RSTS/E V10 Johnny Billquist <bqt@softjar.se> - 2023-11-14 10:12 +0100
    Re: Cobol on RSTS/E V10 S Johnson <westdalefarmer@gmail.com> - 2023-11-14 11:17 -0800
      Re: Cobol on RSTS/E V10 bill <bill.gunshannon@gmail.com> - 2023-11-14 16:34 -0500
        Re: Cobol on RSTS/E V10 S Johnson <westdalefarmer@gmail.com> - 2023-11-14 17:16 -0800
          Re: Cobol on RSTS/E V10 Johnny Billquist <bqt@softjar.se> - 2023-11-15 14:47 +0100
          Re: Cobol on RSTS/E V10 bill <bill.gunshannon@gmail.com> - 2023-11-15 11:03 -0500
            Re: Cobol on RSTS/E V10 S Johnson <westdalefarmer@gmail.com> - 2023-11-15 09:55 -0800
              Re: Cobol on RSTS/E V10 Nigel Williams <nw@retrocomputingtasmania.com> - 2024-09-24 06:25 +0000

csiph-web