Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.os2.setup.video > #30
| From | tholen@antispam.ham |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.os2.setup.video |
| Subject | Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? |
| Date | 2012-10-02 11:55 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <k4eko6$6rb$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <Qg5I6Bo2seGy-pn2-Qg8fcgc2I0Ql@neurobox> <5067696d$0$45143$c3e8da3$1e92ca22@news.astraweb.com> <Qg5I6Bo2seGy-pn2-1SHsw4Bdt0Qy@neurobox> <506a6d36$0$1446$c3e8da3$92d0a893@news.astraweb.com> |
Steve Wendt <spamsux@forgetit.org> writes: > Dariusz Piatkowski wrote: >>>> The monitor does require DVI-D Dual Link hookup, which I think the ATI card >>>> already provides, although I'm checking on this because while the card does have >>>> 2 DVI-I connectors I'm not actualy sure if the 2560x1600 resolution is >>>> supported, nor whether the drivers will combine the 2 DVI-I ports into a single >>>> signal feed. >>> The odds of it working are low - I can tell you it was never tested. >> OK, so I'm thinking the question therefore is more about the following: if >> 'gamode add' allows me to add this resolution to the list, and if I can get all >> the timings/settings synced up between the SNAP and the LCD itself, is there >> anything int he SNAP drivers themselves that may prevent me from successfully >> running at that resolution? >> >> So when you say the odds are 'low'...what sort of reservations do you have? > You expressed it yourself in the quoted text - dual link DVI. As I > recall, 1920x1200 is the upper limit for a single TMDS. Even that > required some extra tricks, since 1600x1200 was the limit with regular > timings: Dell sells a 2560x1600 monitor (same resolution as the Apple Cinema display) with a DisplayPort input, something offered on the newer ThinkPads. That avoids dual link DVI, but isn't a solution to the problem. Pick your poison. I think the eCS folks are going to need to address the video driver issue at some point. I'm running dual head (effectively 3200x1200) using SNAP on a Matrox G450, but I'm at Warp 4.52; if "upgrading" to eCS 2.x on new hardware means downgrading my desktop size, it's not going to happen.
Back to comp.os.os2.setup.video | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
WQXGA LCD for OS/2? "Dariusz Piatkowski" <dariusz@_NO-SPAM_mnsi.net> - 2012-09-29 13:59 +0000
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? Steve Wendt <spamsux@forgetit.org> - 2012-09-29 14:34 -0700
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? "Dariusz Piatkowski" <dariusz@_NO-SPAM_mnsi.net> - 2012-09-30 19:54 +0000
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? Steve Wendt <spamsux@forgetit.org> - 2012-10-01 21:27 -0700
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? tholen@antispam.ham - 2012-10-02 11:55 +0000
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? "Dariusz Piatkowski" <dariusz@_NO-SPAM_mnsi.net> - 2012-10-04 00:45 +0000
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? tholen@antispam.ham - 2012-10-04 12:01 +0000
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? "Dariusz Piatkowski" <dariusz@_NO-SPAM_mnsi.net> - 2012-10-06 16:42 +0000
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? "Alex Taylor" <mail.me@reply.to.address> - 2012-10-08 09:06 -0500
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? tholen@antispam.ham - 2012-10-08 22:56 +0000
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? Steve Wendt <spamsux@forgetit.org> - 2012-10-09 21:06 -0700
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? tholen@antispam.ham - 2012-10-10 16:50 +0000
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? "Dariusz Piatkowski" <dariusz@_NO-SPAM_mnsi.net> - 2012-10-10 23:57 +0000
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? tholen@antispam.ham - 2012-10-11 00:02 +0000
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? Steve Wendt <spamsux@forgetit.org> - 2012-10-10 20:42 -0700
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? "Mark Dodel" <madodelNOSPAM@ptd.net> - 2012-10-11 15:20 -0500
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? "Dariusz Piatkowski" <dariusz@_NO-SPAM_mnsi.net> - 2012-10-13 02:34 +0000
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? Roderick Klein <rwklein@mensys.nl> - 2012-11-01 23:56 +0100
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? "Dariusz Piatkowski" <dariusz@_NO-SPAM_mnsi.net> - 2012-10-04 00:43 +0000
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? Steve Wendt <spamsux@forgetit.org> - 2012-10-03 21:06 -0700
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? "Dariusz Piatkowski" <dariusz@_NO-SPAM_mnsi.net> - 2012-10-06 17:46 +0000
csiph-web