Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.os2.setup.video > #41
| From | "Dariusz Piatkowski" <dariusz@_NO-SPAM_mnsi.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.os2.setup.video |
| Subject | Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? |
| Date | 2012-10-10 23:57 +0000 |
| Organization | NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $19.95 |
| Message-ID | <Qg5I6Bo2seGy-pn2-IzIsCxd6J3LW@neurobox> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <k4eko6$6rb$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mdq090pMZSKk-pn2-fUH3qvMpnd5g@localhost> <k4vlno$kdt$1@speranza.aioe.org> <5074f463$0$60805$c3e8da3$5d8fb80f@news.astraweb.com> <k54919$gq3$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:50:49 UTC, tholen@antispam.ham wrote: > Steve Wendt <spamsux@forgetit.org> writes: > > >>>> I think the eCS folks are going to need to address the video driver issue > >>>> at some point. I'm running dual head (effectively 3200x1200) using SNAP > >>>> on a Matrox G450, but I'm at Warp 4.52; if "upgrading" to eCS 2.x on new > >>>> hardware means downgrading my desktop size, it's not going to happen. > > >>> Um, why would it? Same OS, same card (I assume), same video drivers. > > >> If it's the same card, then it's not "new" hardware. > > > The odds of running an OS/2 desktop at 3200x1200 on any hardware > > released since 2006 are pretty close to zero... > > Then we're in agreement. "It's not going to happen." > > The eCS folks will need to do something about that, sooner or later. Instead of re-starting from scratch, why wouldn't the SNAP model be picked up and developed further? Did it all come down to cost? Or was there a technical reason...I had always wondered given the well established base of SNAP drivers out there.
Back to comp.os.os2.setup.video | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
WQXGA LCD for OS/2? "Dariusz Piatkowski" <dariusz@_NO-SPAM_mnsi.net> - 2012-09-29 13:59 +0000
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? Steve Wendt <spamsux@forgetit.org> - 2012-09-29 14:34 -0700
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? "Dariusz Piatkowski" <dariusz@_NO-SPAM_mnsi.net> - 2012-09-30 19:54 +0000
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? Steve Wendt <spamsux@forgetit.org> - 2012-10-01 21:27 -0700
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? tholen@antispam.ham - 2012-10-02 11:55 +0000
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? "Dariusz Piatkowski" <dariusz@_NO-SPAM_mnsi.net> - 2012-10-04 00:45 +0000
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? tholen@antispam.ham - 2012-10-04 12:01 +0000
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? "Dariusz Piatkowski" <dariusz@_NO-SPAM_mnsi.net> - 2012-10-06 16:42 +0000
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? "Alex Taylor" <mail.me@reply.to.address> - 2012-10-08 09:06 -0500
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? tholen@antispam.ham - 2012-10-08 22:56 +0000
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? Steve Wendt <spamsux@forgetit.org> - 2012-10-09 21:06 -0700
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? tholen@antispam.ham - 2012-10-10 16:50 +0000
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? "Dariusz Piatkowski" <dariusz@_NO-SPAM_mnsi.net> - 2012-10-10 23:57 +0000
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? tholen@antispam.ham - 2012-10-11 00:02 +0000
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? Steve Wendt <spamsux@forgetit.org> - 2012-10-10 20:42 -0700
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? "Mark Dodel" <madodelNOSPAM@ptd.net> - 2012-10-11 15:20 -0500
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? "Dariusz Piatkowski" <dariusz@_NO-SPAM_mnsi.net> - 2012-10-13 02:34 +0000
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? Roderick Klein <rwklein@mensys.nl> - 2012-11-01 23:56 +0100
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? "Dariusz Piatkowski" <dariusz@_NO-SPAM_mnsi.net> - 2012-10-04 00:43 +0000
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? Steve Wendt <spamsux@forgetit.org> - 2012-10-03 21:06 -0700
Re: WQXGA LCD for OS/2? "Dariusz Piatkowski" <dariusz@_NO-SPAM_mnsi.net> - 2012-10-06 17:46 +0000
csiph-web