Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.os.os2.setup.storage > #88

Re: SSD drives in OS/2?

Date 2013-08-13 17:50 +0200
From Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org>
Newsgroups comp.os.os2.setup.misc, comp.os.os2.setup.storage
Subject Re: SSD drives in OS/2?
References (2 earlier) <Qg5I6Bo2seGy-pn2-pp58W6TxRWj8@neurobox> <52050b07$0$6556$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <5205caae$0$10363$c3e8da3$9b4ff22a@news.astraweb.com> <5205f5ad$0$6565$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <Jd11RFbi8Eoq-pn2-W24LJwy4VGZ6@W500>
Message-ID <520a55bc$0$6552$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> (permalink)
Organization Arcor

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 13.08.13 16.28, Fred J. Tydeman wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 08:11:24 UTC, Marcel Mller<news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org>  wrote:
>
>> So a JFS volume on an SSD should always start on an LBA address that is
>> dividable by 8. Creating the partition with Linux or whatever and
>> formatting with OS/2 should do the job. I don't know any OS/2 tool
>> (except for a sector editor) that can do the alignment.
>
> Can a SSD have a mixture of partitions that are 0.5K and 4K blocks?
> That is  0.5K for FAT-16, HPFS and 4K for NTFS, JFS, ext4.

The SSD won't directly care about that, but the more write commands with 
less than 4k the more data is effectively written to the device.

BTW: FAT16 with 0,5k block size is not that common since it is 
restricted to 32 MB. At 256 MB the cluster size is 4kB.
However, with FAT16 extra care needs to be taken to ensure the 
alignment, because the first cluster of a FAT16 volume does usually 
start at an odd sector number. It is possible to come around this by 
using the special reserved sector field of the boot block.


Marcel

Back to comp.os.os2.setup.storage | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

SSD drives in OS/2? "Dariusz Piatkowski" <dariusz@_NO-SPAM_mnsi.net> - 2012-10-06 16:37 +0000
  Re: SSD drives in OS/2? Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2012-10-06 19:24 +0200
    Re: SSD drives in OS/2? "Dariusz Piatkowski" <dariusz@_NO-SPAM_mnsi.net> - 2012-10-08 14:01 +0000
  Re: SSD drives in OS/2? "Trevor Hemsley" <Trevor.Hemsley@mytrousers.ntlworld.com> - 2012-10-09 15:23 -0500
    Re: SSD drives in OS/2? "Dariusz Piatkowski" <dariusz@_NO-SPAM_mnsi.net> - 2013-08-05 04:48 +0000
      Re: SSD drives in OS/2? Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2013-08-09 17:30 +0200
        Re: SSD drives in OS/2? Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> - 2013-08-09 22:09 -0700
          Re: SSD drives in OS/2? Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2013-08-10 10:11 +0200
            Re: SSD drives in OS/2? Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> - 2013-08-11 20:06 -0700
              Re: SSD drives in OS/2? Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2013-08-12 10:13 +0200
            Re: SSD drives in OS/2? "Fred J. Tydeman" <tydeman.consulting@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-08-13 14:28 +0000
              Re: SSD drives in OS/2? Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2013-08-13 17:50 +0200
  Re: SSD drives in OS/2? "Trevor Hemsley" <Trevor.Hemsley@mytrousers.ntlworld.com> - 2012-10-09 15:50 -0500

csiph-web