Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.os2.setup.storage > #88
| Date | 2013-08-13 17:50 +0200 |
|---|---|
| From | Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.os2.setup.misc, comp.os.os2.setup.storage |
| Subject | Re: SSD drives in OS/2? |
| References | (2 earlier) <Qg5I6Bo2seGy-pn2-pp58W6TxRWj8@neurobox> <52050b07$0$6556$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <5205caae$0$10363$c3e8da3$9b4ff22a@news.astraweb.com> <5205f5ad$0$6565$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <Jd11RFbi8Eoq-pn2-W24LJwy4VGZ6@W500> |
| Message-ID | <520a55bc$0$6552$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> (permalink) |
| Organization | Arcor |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 13.08.13 16.28, Fred J. Tydeman wrote: > On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 08:11:24 UTC, Marcel Mller<news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> wrote: > >> So a JFS volume on an SSD should always start on an LBA address that is >> dividable by 8. Creating the partition with Linux or whatever and >> formatting with OS/2 should do the job. I don't know any OS/2 tool >> (except for a sector editor) that can do the alignment. > > Can a SSD have a mixture of partitions that are 0.5K and 4K blocks? > That is 0.5K for FAT-16, HPFS and 4K for NTFS, JFS, ext4. The SSD won't directly care about that, but the more write commands with less than 4k the more data is effectively written to the device. BTW: FAT16 with 0,5k block size is not that common since it is restricted to 32 MB. At 256 MB the cluster size is 4kB. However, with FAT16 extra care needs to be taken to ensure the alignment, because the first cluster of a FAT16 volume does usually start at an odd sector number. It is possible to come around this by using the special reserved sector field of the boot block. Marcel
Back to comp.os.os2.setup.storage | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
SSD drives in OS/2? "Dariusz Piatkowski" <dariusz@_NO-SPAM_mnsi.net> - 2012-10-06 16:37 +0000
Re: SSD drives in OS/2? Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2012-10-06 19:24 +0200
Re: SSD drives in OS/2? "Dariusz Piatkowski" <dariusz@_NO-SPAM_mnsi.net> - 2012-10-08 14:01 +0000
Re: SSD drives in OS/2? "Trevor Hemsley" <Trevor.Hemsley@mytrousers.ntlworld.com> - 2012-10-09 15:23 -0500
Re: SSD drives in OS/2? "Dariusz Piatkowski" <dariusz@_NO-SPAM_mnsi.net> - 2013-08-05 04:48 +0000
Re: SSD drives in OS/2? Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2013-08-09 17:30 +0200
Re: SSD drives in OS/2? Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> - 2013-08-09 22:09 -0700
Re: SSD drives in OS/2? Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2013-08-10 10:11 +0200
Re: SSD drives in OS/2? Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> - 2013-08-11 20:06 -0700
Re: SSD drives in OS/2? Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2013-08-12 10:13 +0200
Re: SSD drives in OS/2? "Fred J. Tydeman" <tydeman.consulting@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-08-13 14:28 +0000
Re: SSD drives in OS/2? Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2013-08-13 17:50 +0200
Re: SSD drives in OS/2? "Trevor Hemsley" <Trevor.Hemsley@mytrousers.ntlworld.com> - 2012-10-09 15:50 -0500
csiph-web