Re: Updated GCC builds

From	"A.D. Fundum" <what.ever@neverm.ind>
Message-ID	<o8uYFJ3iqTdG-pn2-XJTM7NGbcfdP@localhost> (permalink)
Newsgroups	comp.os.os2.programmer.misc, comp.os.os2.programmer.porting
Subject	Re: Updated GCC builds
References	(1 earlier) <ku6nri$mim$1@dont-email.me> <ku7473$4ml$1@dont-email.me> <ku82ie$akc$1@tnews.hananet.net> <o8uYFJ3iqTdG-pn2-vS67Q2NIZdqR@localhost> <kuarg2$1u3$1@tnews.hananet.net>
Organization	Xennanews
Date	2013-08-12 18:20 +0200

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

> And I don't think there are significant performance differences
> between i486 and i586.

Think? Could be worth a brief test, since it's not about general 
differences and this indeed is the most  important condition. No gain,
no reason to change. Any speed gain which can be noticed can be 
siginificant. In the case of an individual user it can come down to a 
CPU load of 99% instead of 101%, with video speed being a classic 
problem in the world of IBM and Lenovo hardware. I don't know if the 
difference can be noticed while playing an average video, so your 
thought could very well be quite right.


--

Back to comp.os.os2.programmer.porting | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Updated GCC builds Paul Smedley <paul@smedley.id.au> - 2013-08-10 19:27 +0930
  Re: Updated GCC builds Paul Smedley <paul@smedley.id.au> - 2013-08-11 10:32 +0930
    Re: Updated GCC builds Paul Smedley <paul@smedley.id.au> - 2013-08-11 14:03 +0930
      Re: Updated GCC builds KO Myung-Hun <komh@chollian.net> - 2013-08-11 22:11 +0900
        Re: Updated GCC builds "A.D. Fundum" <what.ever@neverm.ind> - 2013-08-11 21:36 +0200
          Re: Updated GCC builds KO Myung-Hun <komh@chollian.net> - 2013-08-12 23:29 +0900
            Re: Updated GCC builds Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> - 2013-08-12 08:08 -0700
              Re: Updated GCC builds "A.D. Fundum" <what.ever@neverm.ind> - 2013-08-12 21:50 +0200
                Re: Updated GCC builds gianfli.cim@gmail.com - 2013-08-13 01:40 -0700
            Re: Updated GCC builds "A.D. Fundum" <what.ever@neverm.ind> - 2013-08-12 18:20 +0200
        Re: Updated GCC builds Paul Smedley <paul@smedley.id.au> - 2013-08-12 19:05 +0930
          Re: Updated GCC builds KO Myung-Hun <komh@chollian.net> - 2013-08-13 01:49 +0900
      Re: Updated GCC builds Paul Smedley <paul@smedley.id.au> - 2013-08-12 19:04 +0930
        Re: Updated GCC builds Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2013-08-12 17:06 +0200
      Re: Updated GCC builds - 4.7.3 now available Paul Smedley <paul@smedley.id.au> - 2013-08-18 18:52 +0930
        Re: Updated GCC builds - 4.7.3 now available Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> - 2013-08-18 09:04 -0700
          Re: Updated GCC builds - 4.7.3 now available Paul Smedley <paul@smedley.id.au> - 2013-08-19 19:24 +0930
        Re: Updated GCC builds - 4.7.3 now available KO Myung-Hun <komh@chollian.net> - 2013-08-19 22:04 +0900
          Re: Updated GCC builds - 4.7.3 now available Paul Smedley <paul@smedley.id.au> - 2013-08-22 19:09 +0930
            Re: Updated GCC builds - 4.7.3 now available Paul Smedley <paul@smedley.id.au> - 2013-09-07 18:58 +0930
              Re: Updated GCC builds - 4.7.3 now available KO Myung-Hun <komh@chollian.net> - 2013-09-07 22:11 +0900
                Re: Updated GCC builds - 4.7.3 now available Paul Smedley <paul@smedley.id.au> - 2013-09-23 19:22 +0930
              Re: Updated GCC builds - 4.7.3 now available "Mentore Siesto" <mentoreshoryu@fattimiei.zx> - 2013-09-08 09:39 +0000
        Re: Updated GCC builds - 4.7.3 now available gianfli.cim@gmail.com - 2013-09-17 06:08 -0700
          Re: Updated GCC builds - 4.7.3 now available Paul Smedley <paul@smedley.id.au> - 2013-09-23 19:24 +0930
            Re: Updated GCC builds - 4.7.3 now available gianfli.cim@gmail.com - 2013-09-23 13:29 -0700
              Re: Updated GCC builds - 4.7.3 now available Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> - 2013-09-23 13:59 -0700

csiph-web