Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.os2.programmer.misc > #1671
| From | "Andi B." <andi.b@gmx.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.os2.programmer.misc |
| Subject | Re: Does ICAT understand watcom .sym files? |
| Date | 2019-12-30 14:15 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <quct8v$clk$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <qu7noc$q7k$1@dont-email.me> <h6s36fFeg45U1@mid.individual.net> |
nospam_2019@efbe.prima.de schrieb: > Am 28.12.19 um 15:10 schrieb Andi B.: >> In an old thread Steven wrote - >> >>>Eventually ICAT was developed. At first it only understood CodeView and >>>Visualage C debug formats. This was because the OS/2 version of >>>Microsoft C was used to develop many of the .ADD and .SYS device drivers. >>>CSet/2 and its successor VAC were used to develop VDD's. >>> > > ... > >> Anyone successfully run remote source level debugging with ICAT and >> wcc386 and wlink? >> >> Some time ago I tried to convince watcom to produce CodeView debugging >> information. But I didn't get working source level debugging with ICAT too. >> >> Any hints to get ICAT source level debugging with watcom are welcome. >> >> Regards, Andreas > > Hello Andi, > > What prevents using OW remote debugging? > CU/2 > Frank > Hi Frank, nice to see you still hanging around here :-) wdw.exe - beside the ugly fonts it uses you mean? Starting "wdw /tr=net ..." shows a message 'DosSMRegisterDD not allowed' (or similar). The same with wd.exe. I try to debug gareport.exe. This is a CLI app which tries to detect the installed graphic card and it's capabilities via SNAP. Although the app runs fine without PM I couldn't manage to debug it with OW. But it runs under ICAT control. Greetings, Andi
Back to comp.os.os2.programmer.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Does ICAT understand watcom .sym files? "Andi B." <andi.b@gmx.net> - 2019-12-28 15:10 +0100
Re: Does ICAT understand watcom .sym files? nospam_2019@efbe.prima.de - 2019-12-29 17:39 +0100
Re: Does ICAT understand watcom .sym files? Lars Erdmann <lars.erdmann@arcor.de> - 2019-12-30 09:00 +0100
Re: Does ICAT understand watcom .sym files? Marcel Mueller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2019-12-30 11:30 +0100
Re: Does ICAT understand watcom .sym files? "Andi B." <andi.b@gmx.net> - 2019-12-30 14:34 +0100
Re: Does ICAT understand watcom .sym files? Lars Erdmann <lars.erdmann@arcor.de> - 2019-12-30 17:24 +0100
Re: Does ICAT understand watcom .sym files? "Andi B." <andi.b@gmx.net> - 2019-12-30 14:17 +0100
Re: Does ICAT understand watcom .sym files? "Andi B." <andi.b@gmx.net> - 2019-12-30 14:15 +0100
Re: Does ICAT understand watcom .sym files? Lars Erdmann <lars.erdmann@arcor.de> - 2019-12-30 17:20 +0100
Re: Does ICAT understand watcom .sym files? "Andi B." <andi.b@gmx.net> - 2019-12-31 13:16 +0100
Re: Does ICAT understand watcom .sym files? Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> - 2019-12-30 13:03 -0800
Re: Does ICAT understand watcom .sym files? "Andi B." <andi.b@gmx.net> - 2019-12-31 12:57 +0100
Re: Does ICAT understand watcom .sym files? Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> - 2019-12-31 12:10 -0800
Re: Does ICAT understand watcom .sym files? Lars Erdmann <lars.erdmann@arcor.de> - 2019-12-30 09:14 +0100
Re: Does ICAT understand watcom .sym files? "Andi B." <andi.b@gmx.net> - 2019-12-30 14:47 +0100
csiph-web