Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.os2.programmer.misc > #1608
| From | Lars Erdmann <lars.erdmann@arcor.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.os2.programmer.misc |
| Subject | Re: ICAT 'XCPT_BAD_ACCESS' - what does it mean? |
| Date | 2017-12-31 21:30 +0100 |
| Organization | solani.org |
| Message-ID | <p2bhd8$u9v$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | <p1vsob$l1p$1@dont-email.me> <11p86vVJT4Oe-pn2-bkgdMpp7SV6j@slamain> <p252th$6o6$1@dont-email.me> <11p86vVJT4Oe-pn2-yeSdUENdor3Y@slamain> <p2ag4l$sck$3@dont-email.me> |
Hi Andy, I think you are right about functions not creating a proper stack frame. I had these issues with ICAT as well. Lars On 31.12.17 12.02, Andi B. wrote: > Steven Levine schrieb: >> On Fri, 29 Dec 2017 09:46:30 UTC, "Andi B." <andi.b@gmx.net> wrote: >> >> HI Andi, >> >>> > To verify this you need to look at the content of the >>> > ExceptionReportRecord. >> >>> Have to learn about. >> >> The structures are well documented, with the exception of the FP >> specific data. A pointer to the Exception Report Record is passed to >> the handler. If you dump the data as dwords, it's readable if you >> works out the field offsets. >> >>> Yes. All in the runtime and I do not find a way back to the caller. >> >> Most likely because some of the code is not using standard stack >> frames. It's also possible the stack is corrupted. What you need to >> do in this case is dump the stack as dwords and walk the stack by >> hand.
Back to comp.os.os2.programmer.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
ICAT 'XCPT_BAD_ACCESS' - what does it mean? "Andi B." <andi.b@gmx.net> - 2017-12-27 11:30 +0100
Re: ICAT 'XCPT_BAD_ACCESS' - what does it mean? Lars Erdmann <lars.erdmann@arcor.de> - 2017-12-27 13:53 +0100
Re: ICAT 'XCPT_BAD_ACCESS' - what does it mean? Lars Erdmann <lars.erdmann@arcor.de> - 2017-12-27 13:55 +0100
Re: ICAT 'XCPT_BAD_ACCESS' - what does it mean? "Steven Levine" <steve53@nomail.earthlink.net> - 2017-12-27 14:23 -0600
Re: ICAT 'XCPT_BAD_ACCESS' - what does it mean? "Andi B." <andi.b@gmx.net> - 2017-12-29 10:46 +0100
Re: ICAT 'XCPT_BAD_ACCESS' - what does it mean? "Steven Levine" <steve53@nomail.earthlink.net> - 2017-12-30 12:05 -0600
Re: ICAT 'XCPT_BAD_ACCESS' - what does it mean? "Andi B." <andi.b@gmx.net> - 2017-12-31 12:02 +0100
Re: ICAT 'XCPT_BAD_ACCESS' - what does it mean? Lars Erdmann <lars.erdmann@arcor.de> - 2017-12-31 21:30 +0100
Re: ICAT 'XCPT_BAD_ACCESS' - what does it mean? Paul Ratcliffe <abuse@orac12.clara34.co56.uk78> - 2018-01-03 19:26 +0000
csiph-web