Re: another VIO attempt

Newsgroups	comp.os.os2.programmer.misc
Date	2024-02-15 09:07 -0800
References	<uqk6ia$35m65$1@dont-email.me> <d6855582-82fd-4883-8806-7bb0de30c63fn@googlegroups.com> <uql3ho$3arit$1@dont-email.me> <0f00a22e-65eb-4587-a626-be2f62f1b1a7n@googlegroups.com> <uqlaa8$3c2rd$1@dont-email.me>
Message-ID	<00f3a007-8f4e-444b-94ce-2a094ab7798dn@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: another VIO attempt
From	xhajt03 <xhajt03@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On February 15, 2024 at 16:23:54 +0100 Paul Edwards wrote:
 .
 .
> Don't you use ArcaOS? It comes with Thunderbird.

No, I use eCS (among others). I know I could install TB (on all my machines... :/ ).

> You can get a free account here: 
> 
> https://www.eternal-september.org/

Thanks for the link.

 .
 .
> One of my experiments involved calling the Kbd calls. 
> I was using the Watcom compiler and libraries for 
> that, and it produced a standalone executable. Would 
> that executable have been marked as level 2? 

Actually, I was wrong, you don't need that for the 16-bit calls, sorry for the confusion. :-( I mixed it up with another functionality for which EMX run-time libraries might be used, in particular port access (level 2 allows that, level 3 doesn't). In other words, you can stay at level 3 all the time, regardless from being pure 32-bit code or calling 16-bit API functions via thunking.

Regards

Tomas

Back to comp.os.os2.programmer.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

another VIO attempt Paul Edwards <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-02-15 13:13 +0800
  Re: another VIO attempt xhajt03 <xhajt03@gmail.com> - 2024-02-15 04:16 -0800
    Re: another VIO attempt Paul Edwards <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-02-15 21:28 +0800
      Re: another VIO attempt xhajt03 <xhajt03@gmail.com> - 2024-02-15 06:47 -0800
        Re: another VIO attempt Paul Edwards <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-02-15 23:23 +0800
          Re: another VIO attempt xhajt03 <xhajt03@gmail.com> - 2024-02-15 09:07 -0800
            Re: another VIO attempt Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> - 2024-02-15 17:13 -0800
          Re: another VIO attempt Paul Edwards <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-02-17 16:58 +0800
            Re: another VIO attempt Paul Edwards <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-02-17 18:09 +0800
      Re: another VIO attempt Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> - 2024-02-15 17:38 -0800
        Re: another VIO attempt Paul Edwards <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-02-16 16:17 +0800
          Re: another VIO attempt Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> - 2024-02-16 15:05 -0800
            Re: another VIO attempt Paul Edwards <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-02-17 09:44 +0800
              Re: another VIO attempt Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> - 2024-02-17 15:47 -0800
                Re: another VIO attempt Paul Edwards <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-02-18 09:48 +0800

csiph-web