Groups > comp.os.msdos.programmer > #4310

Re: [OpenWatcom] building a COM file without pulling in the Watcom standard library

From	"R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.os.msdos.programmer
Subject	Re: [OpenWatcom] building a COM file without pulling in the Watcom standard library
Date	2023-08-04 16:29 +0200
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<uaj216$1a8bc$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<20230731172858.11ce54d9@mateusz><uafp57$m0mf$1@dont-email.me><20230803120734.34e59904@mateusz><uai619$161tu$1@dont-email.me> <20230804140324.0ae56909@mateusz>

Show all headers | View raw

Mateusz,

> It appears that without startup code, wlink simply won't generate
> a proper COM.

I did a quick DDG search for "OpenWatcom create COM style file", got
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46408334/com-executables-with-open-watcom
and noticed "BlackJack"s response.

From there I did another search for "OpenWatcom set model tiny", and from 
the DDG result (https://github.com/open-watcom/open-watcom-v2/issues/275) 
and your initial post I noticed that you are compiling with the "-ms" switch 
(small memory model), which is incompatible with a COM style executable. 
Try "-mt" (tiny memory model) instead.

Regards,
Rudy Wieser

Back to comp.os.msdos.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

[OpenWatcom] building a COM file without pulling in the Watcom standard library Mateusz Viste <mateusz@x.invalid> - 2023-07-31 17:28 +0200
  Re: [OpenWatcom] building a COM file without pulling in the Watcom standard library JJ <jj4public@outlook.com> - 2023-08-01 18:38 +0700
    Re: [OpenWatcom] building a COM file without pulling in the Watcom standard library Mateusz Viste <mateusz@x.invalid> - 2023-08-01 14:50 +0200
      Re: [OpenWatcom] building a COM file without pulling in the Watcom standard library T. Ment <t.ment@protocol.invalid> - 2023-08-01 15:23 +0100
  Re: [OpenWatcom] building a COM file without pulling in the Watcom standard library "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2023-08-02 20:28 -0700
    Re: [OpenWatcom] building a COM file without pulling in the Watcom standard library Mateusz Viste <mateusz@x.invalid> - 2023-08-03 10:21 +0200
      Re: [OpenWatcom] building a COM file without pulling in the Watcom standard library "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2023-08-03 19:41 -0700
        Re: [OpenWatcom] building a COM file without pulling in the Watcom standard library Mateusz Viste <mateusz@x.invalid> - 2023-08-04 14:03 +0200
  Re: [OpenWatcom] building a COM file without pulling in the Watcom standard library "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2023-08-03 10:39 +0200
    Re: [OpenWatcom] building a COM file without pulling in the Watcom standard library Mateusz Viste <mateusz@x.invalid> - 2023-08-03 12:07 +0200
      Re: [OpenWatcom] building a COM file without pulling in the Watcom standard library "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2023-08-03 14:35 +0200
      Re: [OpenWatcom] building a COM file without pulling in the Watcom standard library "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2023-08-04 08:31 +0200
        Re: [OpenWatcom] building a COM file without pulling in the Watcom standard library Mateusz Viste <mateusz@x.invalid> - 2023-08-04 14:03 +0200
          Re: [OpenWatcom] building a COM file without pulling in the Watcom standard library "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2023-08-04 16:29 +0200
            Re: [OpenWatcom] building a COM file without pulling in the Watcom standard library Mateusz Viste <mateusz@x.invalid> - 2023-08-04 16:56 +0200
              Re: [OpenWatcom] building a COM file without pulling in the Watcom standard library "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2023-08-04 19:02 +0200
                Re: [OpenWatcom] building a COM file without pulling in the Watcom standard library Mateusz Viste <mateusz@x.invalid> - 2023-08-04 21:18 +0200
  Re: [OpenWatcom] building a COM file without pulling in the Watcom standard library Mateusz Viste <mateusz@x.invalid> - 2023-11-10 00:19 +0100

csiph-web