Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.msdos.programmer > #492
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | 98 Guy <98@Guy.com> |
| Newsgroups | microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion, microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, comp.os.msdos.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Running an old DOS program |
| Date | Thu, 08 Mar 2012 10:24:51 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Lines | 66 |
| Message-ID | <4F58CF43.55165D3@Guy.com> (permalink) |
| References | <9e5c5ee4-32f1-45b1-b810-59eaeb63e627@do4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | aWNVhQzTMhBG11EewjBGKw.user.speranza.aioe.org |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@aioe.org |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) |
| X-Accept-Language | en |
| X-Notice | Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.os.msdos.programmer:492 |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
Industrial One wrote: > I was told that legacy DOS drivers are no longer made for modern > mobos as of like 5 years ago, It's my impression that the only "DOS" drivers that really keep hanging on or keep showing up on the driver CD of new motherboards are for the integrated network (ethernet) ports. Same also for PCI ethernet cards. I can't really say that I've ever seen DOS drivers lately for other aspects of the guts of your typical PC (such as chipset, sound, video, usb, etc). Normally the system BIOS can supply DOS with all it needs to interact with the video system (at least up to VGA 640 x 480 mode), com ports, IDE and even SATA controllers and attached drives, keyboard and mouse, etc. USB under DOS has always been a questionable issue - but given your handle (Industrial One) I would suspect that you wound't have much interest or need in USB functionality under DOS. Something that would affect the situation drastically for DOS on modern motherboards is the change from the traditional BIOS to some new form of bios that I hear is coming out (or is already out) on some bleeding-edge motherboards (I forget what it's called). Oh - you should have cross-posted this to some DOS groups, because Windows 98 is not really a DOS-based operating system. It is a win32 OS that just happens to get boot-strapped or started from a DOS-mode state. Win-98 puts the CPU into 32-bit protected mode and offers a virtual DOS environment for any 16-bit apps that need it. Win-2k and XP does the same thing, and I think so does Vista. Windows 7 (I think) does not offer a virtual DOS environment. I'm adding comp.os.msdos.programmer to the distribution of this thread (it seems to be the most active "DOS" group). > but I constantly hear about nostalgic mofos finding workarounds. You can take pretty much any motherboard made even today and boot and run DOS on it, regardless what sort of hard-drive you attach to the system. There is nothing nostalgic about that. What you might or should find nostalgic is seeing any win-9x/me drivers for modern hardware. You seem to be equating win-9x/me to DOS in terms of drivers or hardware, and that would be a false equation. > I do have a workaround which is DOSBox but it greatly slowed down > the performance. > > So yeah, any way to run my program natively or at least a way > faster than running it through DOSBox? Booting a moderm motherboard with DOS is easily possible. Why haven't you tried that? Go out and do a search for "DOS 7.1" and download it from the web some where. Put it on a floppy disk and take it to your desired or target machine and boot it with the floppy. Attach a hard drive to the machine and run fdisk and format from the floppy and format the hard drive so that it will boot into DOS all by itself. Copy all the files and software you have from your windoze PC to this DOS pc using what-ever means you can (floppy disks, burned onto a CD, etc). Why is this so hard for people to do?
Back to comp.os.msdos.programmer | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Running an old DOS program 98 Guy <98@Guy.com> - 2012-03-08 10:24 -0500
Re: Running an old DOS program Ken Springer <wordworks@greeleynet.com> - 2012-03-08 08:39 -0700
Re: Running an old DOS program Industrial One <industrial_one@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-08 09:06 -0800
Re: Running an old DOS program Ken Springer <wordworks@greeleynet.com> - 2012-03-08 10:32 -0700
Re: Running an old DOS program Lostgallifreyan <no-one@nowhere.net> - 2012-03-08 17:44 -0600
Re: Running an old DOS program Franc Zabkar <fzabkar@iinternode.on.net> - 2012-03-09 13:36 +1100
Re: Running an old DOS program Industrial One <industrial_one@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-09 08:07 -0800
Re: Running an old DOS program Lostgallifreyan <no-one@nowhere.net> - 2012-03-09 11:32 -0600
Re: Running an old DOS program Franc Zabkar <fzabkar@iinternode.on.net> - 2012-03-14 09:10 +1100
Re: Running an old DOS program Rugxulo <rugxulo@gmail.com> - 2012-03-30 14:37 -0700
Re: Running an old DOS program Industrial One <industrial_one@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-30 17:45 -0700
Re: Running an old DOS program Ronald Phillips <ronald.phillips@gmail.com> - 2012-04-06 09:49 -0700
Re: Running an old DOS program piper@nohoo.com - 2012-03-09 10:33 -0600
Re: Running an old DOS program Lostgallifreyan <no-one@nowhere.net> - 2012-03-09 11:40 -0600
Re: Running an old DOS program Zaphod Beeblebrox <Zaphod.Arisztid.Beeblebrox@gmail.com> - 2012-03-09 13:34 -0500
Re: Running an old DOS program Jim Leonard <mobygamer@gmail.com> - 2012-03-15 07:52 -0700
Re: Running an old DOS program Lostgallifreyan <no-one@nowhere.net> - 2012-03-08 17:33 -0600
Re: Running an old DOS program dg1261 <dgREMOVE-THIS1261@cs.com> - 2012-03-10 01:23 +0000
Re: Running an old DOS program Lostgallifreyan <no-one@nowhere.net> - 2012-03-09 21:02 -0600
Re: Running an old DOS program Industrial One <industrial_one@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-10 04:41 -0800
Re: Running an old DOS program Lostgallifreyan <no-one@nowhere.net> - 2012-03-10 17:44 -0600
Re: Running an old DOS program Industrial One <industrial_one@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-11 03:00 -0700
Re: Running an old DOS program Lostgallifreyan <no-one@nowhere.net> - 2012-03-11 06:14 -0500
Re: Running an old DOS program Industrial One <industrial_one@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-11 04:35 -0700
Re: Running an old DOS program Lostgallifreyan <no-one@nowhere.net> - 2012-03-11 08:46 -0500
Re: Running an old DOS program BillW50 <BillW50@aol.kom> - 2012-03-11 09:35 -0500
Re: Running an old DOS program Lostgallifreyan <no-one@nowhere.net> - 2012-03-11 10:06 -0500
Re: Running an old DOS program Industrial One <industrial_one@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-11 17:57 -0700
Re: Running an old DOS program Lostgallifreyan <no-one@nowhere.net> - 2012-03-11 20:59 -0500
Re: Running an old DOS program Industrial One <industrial_one@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-11 19:33 -0700
Re: Running an old DOS program Lostgallifreyan <no-one@nowhere.net> - 2012-03-11 22:06 -0500
Re: Running an old DOS program Industrial One <industrial_one@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-11 20:34 -0700
Re: Running an old DOS program Lostgallifreyan <no-one@nowhere.net> - 2012-03-11 23:33 -0500
Re: Running an old DOS program Patok <crazy.div.patok@gmail.com> - 2012-03-12 01:09 -0400
Re: Running an old DOS program Industrial One <industrial_one@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-11 23:02 -0700
Re: Running an old DOS program 98 Guy <98@Guy.com> - 2012-03-12 19:59 -0400
Re: Running an old DOS program Industrial One <industrial_one@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-12 20:44 -0700
Re: Running an old DOS program "Hot-Text" <hot-text@mynews.ath.cx> - 2012-03-14 03:25 -0500
Re: Running an old DOS program Industrial One <industrial_one@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-11 23:02 -0700
Re: Running an old DOS program Rugxulo <rugxulo@gmail.com> - 2012-03-30 14:40 -0700
csiph-web