Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.setup > #4422 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-09-27 07:52 -0500 |
| Last post | 2021-09-28 05:21 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 303 — 19 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.setup
Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 07:52 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2021-09-27 13:18 +0000
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 08:32 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-09-27 09:40 -0400
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-27 15:01 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-09-27 11:17 -0400
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 15:55 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-27 14:57 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2021-09-27 07:36 -0700
Re: Linux Crashing "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-09-27 20:42 +0200
Re: Linux Crashing Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2021-09-27 12:59 -0700
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 15:49 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-27 14:20 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 08:24 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-27 14:49 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 09:09 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-27 20:21 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 23:30 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-28 13:01 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-28 11:34 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-28 19:31 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-28 15:55 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-28 21:53 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 04:08 +0000
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-28 22:54 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 01:59 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-09-29 06:31 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-29 14:13 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 08:15 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-29 15:34 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 21:10 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 23:16 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-30 08:20 -0600
BigTech, BigMedia & BigGovernment. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-09-30 07:38 -0700
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 10:33 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-30 20:35 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 13:13 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 18:26 +0000
I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-09-30 06:36 -0700
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-30 08:23 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-09-30 09:33 -0500
Dilbert.COM Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-09-30 07:47 -0700
Re: Dilbert.COM RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-09-30 11:21 -0400
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-30 20:40 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-10-01 06:19 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 12:51 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-01 08:05 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 18:18 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-01 20:20 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 02:24 +0000
I don't trust programmers who knock #define | goto. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-01 09:46 -0700
Re: I don't trust programmers who knock #define | goto. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 18:19 +0000
Re: I don't trust programmers who knock #define | goto. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-01 20:11 -0600
Re: I don't trust programmers who knock #define | goto. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 09:26 +0100
Re: I don't trust programmers who knock #define | goto. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 10:54 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 15:32 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 15:51 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-01 22:06 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 16:28 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-01 21:09 -0600
## is a godsend. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-01 21:29 -0700
Re: ## is a godsend. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 01:52 -0700
Re: ## is a godsend. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 10:56 +0000
"z1.CPP" ain't no "Dilbert.COM".OopsOops Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 08:57 -0700
Re: ## is a godsend. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 12:59 -0700
Re: ## is a godsend. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 11:31 -0600
Improving "z1.CPP" is a pure joy. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 11:24 -0700
Re: ## is a godsend. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-03 17:31 +0000
Re: ## is a godsend. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-03 19:35 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 09:15 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 11:11 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 16:43 +0000
"Dilbert.COM" has to be "readable". Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 09:48 -0700
Re: "Dilbert.COM" has to be "readable". rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 12:21 -0600
How do you think I kept my 30 year "gig" ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 11:40 -0700
Re: How do you think I kept my 30 year "gig" ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-03 00:44 +0100
Re: How do you think I kept my 30 year "gig" ? Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 01:42 -0500
Re: How do you think I kept my 30 year "gig" ? Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 10:36 +0000
The Covid cult liberated me from my shackles. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-03 09:18 -0700
Re: How do you think I kept my 30 year "gig" ? Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:32 +0000
Re: "Dilbert.COM" has to be "readable". Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 14:56 -0400
My code was forked. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 12:03 -0700
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 12:18 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-03 00:46 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 21:34 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:28 +0000
No one here cares about what my code actually *does*. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 20:27 -0700
Re: No one here cares about what my code actually *does*. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-03 10:40 +0100
One huge routine. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 09:17 -0700
Re: One huge routine. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 16:45 +0000
Max sucks dicks. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 10:04 -0700
Re: Max sucks dicks. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:27 +0000
Re: One huge routine. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 12:27 -0600
Re: One huge routine. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:30 +0000
Re: One huge routine. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 15:30 -0500
Macros & Muscle Memory keep it simple. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 13:47 -0700
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-10-01 16:15 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 16:55 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 09:00 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-02 17:09 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 13:04 -0700
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 11:43 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 21:35 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-04 08:09 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 12:42 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-01 21:15 -0600
Whitespace & Comments indicates _problems_. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-01 21:36 -0700
Re: Whitespace & Comments indicates _problems_. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 05:04 +0000
Re: Whitespace & Comments indicates _problems_. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-10-02 06:44 -0500
Re: Whitespace & Comments indicates _problems_. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 09:05 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 09:03 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 12:07 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 08:56 +0100
"Permies" aren't script kiddies. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 09:10 -0700
Re: "Permies" aren't script kiddies. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 17:29 +0100
People like me, who work 30 years on a job, aren't cheating. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 09:40 -0700
Re: People like me, who work 30 years on a job, aren't cheating. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 16:45 +0000
Cheating. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 09:55 -0700
Re: Cheating. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-10-02 13:30 -0500
Your "Up" is my "Down". Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 11:45 -0700
Re: Cheating. RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-10-02 15:32 -0400
Re: Cheating. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-02 14:43 -0500
Me, my daughter, and my son. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 13:07 -0700
Re: Me, my daughter, and my son. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 16:50 -0500
Re: Me, my daughter, and my son. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-02 16:51 -0500
Re: Me, my daughter, and my son. Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2021-10-02 15:29 -0700
Re: Me, my daughter, and my son. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:36 +0000
Re: Me, my daughter, and my son. RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-10-02 22:17 -0400
Re: Me, my daughter, and my son. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-03 03:26 +0100
My kids were born blonde and blue-eyed. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 13:03 -0700
Re: My kids were born blonde and blue-eyed. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:34 +0000
I was blonde, when younger. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 20:21 -0700
Re: I was blonde, when younger. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 04:50 +0000
Re: I was blonde, when younger. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 00:16 -0500
Re: I was blonde, when younger. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 10:34 +0000
Re: I was blonde, when younger. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 10:04 -0500
Re: I was blonde, when younger. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 19:11 +0000
Re: I was blonde, when younger. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 18:31 -0500
Re: I was blonde, when younger. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 04:53 +0000
Re: I was blonde, when younger. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 13:42 -0500
Tell me you don't like "Former U.S.S.R." girls of Nordic origin ! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-03 12:08 -0700
Re: Tell me you don't like "Former U.S.S.R." girls of Nordic origin ! Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 19:10 -0500
Re: Cheating. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:25 +0000
I did _not_ believe she'd do it. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 20:14 -0700
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 23:26 -0500
Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 21:45 -0700
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 04:51 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 00:18 -0500
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 10:35 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 10:10 -0500
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 19:13 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2021-10-03 19:52 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 20:03 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2021-10-03 20:18 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 20:32 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2021-10-03 20:39 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> - 2021-10-03 21:21 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 04:48 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 04:46 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-10-03 19:53 -0400
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 18:33 -0500
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 04:54 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 01:05 -0500
Seattle hates smokers with a deep passion. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-03 09:09 -0700
Re: Seattle hates smokers with a deep passion. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-03 12:18 -0600
Seattle's not big on tolerance. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-03 11:38 -0700
Re: Seattle hates smokers with a deep passion. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 19:18 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-03 12:03 -0600
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 21:46 -0500
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-03 11:55 -0600
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-03 11:50 +0100
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 10:55 +0000
TFZ is better then Face-To-Face sex. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-03 09:41 -0700
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-03 17:31 +0000
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-05 19:01 -0500
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 04:49 +0000
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 00:15 -0500
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 10:34 +0000
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 10:01 -0500
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 19:10 +0000
Life is everything, yet nothing. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-03 12:17 -0700
Re: Life is everything, yet nothing. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 20:00 +0000
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 18:30 -0500
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 04:52 +0000
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-03 11:56 +0100
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 10:14 -0500
Re: People like me, who work 30 years on a job, aren't cheating. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 13:33 -0500
The loans-to-deposits ratio is insane, nothing a banker would want. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-03 11:56 -0700
Re: People like me, who work 30 years on a job, aren't cheating. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-03 19:55 -0600
Re: "Permies" aren't script kiddies. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-02 17:09 +0000
Re: "Permies" aren't script kiddies. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 11:35 -0600
My work got done joyously. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 11:28 -0700
Re: My work got done joyously. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:31 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-01 20:44 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 09:50 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 12:55 -0600
Recursion makes good algorithms & bad implementations. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 12:15 -0700
Re: Recursion makes good algorithms & bad implementations. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:33 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 17:35 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 22:08 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 00:12 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-03 11:47 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-03 11:49 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 20:02 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-03 19:47 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 23:50 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-04 07:54 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 00:08 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 05:12 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 01:51 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 06:56 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 13:28 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 20:18 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-04 07:59 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 13:15 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-01 20:37 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 18:58 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-09-30 18:26 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-30 20:57 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-01 17:43 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 18:19 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-01 19:22 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 18:37 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-01 20:16 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 09:44 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-02 17:09 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 12:49 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 09:38 -0500
10 instances of my "C/C++ console" running simultaneously. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-09-30 07:51 -0700
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 10:08 -0500
Thunderbird can be made to run "right" ( however you want it ). Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-09-30 08:03 -0700
Re: Thunderbird can be made to run "right" ( however you want it ). Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 10:14 -0500
4Re: 1I 5think 2in 5FORTH 1& 7progr 2in 6C/C++ Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-30 08:12 -0700
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-09-30 18:25 +0000
FORTH, C & C++, in that order, have advantages. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-09-30 16:16 -0700
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-30 21:18 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 08:07 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-29 15:26 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 19:59 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-30 12:04 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-09-29 10:57 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 12:01 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-29 20:04 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 15:03 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 20:48 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 20:39 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-09-29 14:11 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-29 20:29 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-09-29 17:56 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 21:00 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-30 12:03 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-30 08:06 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-30 20:23 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-30 20:11 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-01 17:43 +0000
Re: Linux Crashing Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 18:21 +0000
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-01 20:13 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 09:42 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 12:46 -0600
while(1) Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 11:56 -0700
Re: Linux Crashing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-02 17:09 +0000
Re: Linux Crashing Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 14:51 -0400
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 21:22 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-03 17:31 +0000
Re: Linux Crashing Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 15:07 -0400
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 20:27 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 20:14 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 08:02 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-29 15:09 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 19:48 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 00:37 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-29 11:57 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-29 11:55 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-29 11:55 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-09-29 06:25 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 11:50 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 19:40 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-09-30 01:43 +0000
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-30 07:48 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-29 23:53 -0700
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-30 12:06 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-28 07:49 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-28 11:37 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-09-27 09:36 -0400
Re: Linux Crashing RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-09-27 09:37 -0400
Re: Linux Crashing chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-09-27 09:25 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-27 09:50 -0700
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-27 18:33 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-27 11:55 -0700
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 15:43 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-27 14:51 -0700
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 17:05 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-27 21:31 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-28 12:57 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-09-28 19:03 +0000
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 15:38 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-09-27 21:44 -0400
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 22:50 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-28 13:00 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-27 20:27 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 23:22 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-28 07:42 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-28 05:21 +0000
Page 10 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 16 Next page →
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-03 12:17 -0700 |
| Subject | Life is everything, yet nothing. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.3--0.17pm.Seattle.2021> |
| In reply to | #4693 |
Speaking of single men, Max asked: > Are you BEAST or GOD ? God is nature; nothing more, nothing less. Life is everything, yet nothing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-03 20:00 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Life is everything, yet nothing. |
| Message-ID | <SZn6J.38705$GD7.1091@fx23.iad> |
| In reply to | #4696 |
On 2021-10-03, Jeff-Relf.Me @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote: > Speaking of single men, Max asked: >> Are you BEAST or GOD ? > > God is nature; nothing more, nothing less. > > Life is everything, yet nothing. Life is FOOD FOR MOON.... -- 7-77-777 Evil Sinner! to weak you should be meek, and you should brainfuck stronger https://github.com/rofl0r/chaos-pp
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-03 18:30 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. |
| Message-ID | <iruso0F1077U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #4693 |
On 10/3/2021 2:10 PM, Branimir Maksimovic wrote: > On 2021-10-03, whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> wrote: >> On 10/3/2021 5:34 AM, Branimir Maksimovic wrote: >>> On 2021-10-03, whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> wrote: >>>> On 10/2/2021 11:49 PM, Branimir Maksimovic wrote: >>>>> On 2021-10-03, Jeff-Relf.Me @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote: >>>>>> You (Max) replied ( to me ): >>>>>>>> To be fair, I respect her decision; her new man was a better fit for >>>>>>>> her. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Because *you beleived* it will happen :P >>>>>> >>>>>> No, it happened because I did _not_ believe she'd do it. >>>>> >>>>> You are LYING to YOURSELF ... >>>> >>>> Isn't this one of those "it doesn't matter" things? The underlying facts >>>> cannot ever be changed and there is no lesson to be learned that is >>>> usefully applicable to future events. >>> It matters because HE IS LONE... >> >> So am I, so what? > Are you BEAST or GOD? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-04 04:52 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. |
| Message-ID | <hMv6J.155092$Kv2.97198@fx47.iad> |
| In reply to | #4706 |
On 2021-10-03, whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> wrote: > On 10/3/2021 2:10 PM, Branimir Maksimovic wrote: >> On 2021-10-03, whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> wrote: >>> On 10/3/2021 5:34 AM, Branimir Maksimovic wrote: >>>> On 2021-10-03, whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> wrote: >>>>> On 10/2/2021 11:49 PM, Branimir Maksimovic wrote: >>>>>> On 2021-10-03, Jeff-Relf.Me @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote: >>>>>>> You (Max) replied ( to me ): >>>>>>>>> To be fair, I respect her decision; her new man was a better fit for >>>>>>>>> her. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Because *you beleived* it will happen :P >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, it happened because I did _not_ believe she'd do it. >>>>>> >>>>>> You are LYING to YOURSELF ... >>>>> >>>>> Isn't this one of those "it doesn't matter" things? The underlying facts >>>>> cannot ever be changed and there is no lesson to be learned that is >>>>> usefully applicable to future events. >>>> It matters because HE IS LONE... >>> >>> So am I, so what? > >> Are you BEAST or GOD? > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma > Only beast or god can live alone as human si social being: Plato: State :P -- 7-77-777 Evil Sinner! to weak you should be meek, and you should brainfuck stronger https://github.com/rofl0r/chaos-pp
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-03 11:56 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. |
| Message-ID | <sjc29l$oum$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #4651 |
On 03/10/2021 06:15, whodat wrote: > On 10/2/2021 11:49 PM, Branimir Maksimovic wrote: >> On 2021-10-03, Jeff-Relf.Me @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote: >>> You (Max) replied ( to me ): >>>>> To be fair, I respect her decision; >>>>> her new man was a better fit for her. >>>> >>>> Because *you beleived* it will happen :P >>> >>> No, it happened because I did _not_ believe she'd do it. >> >> You are LYING to YOURSELF ... > > Isn't this one of those "it doesn't matter" things? The underlying > facts cannot ever be changed and there is no lesson to be learned > that is usefully applicable to future events. Ah. The philosophical Problem of Induction. Given a result, establish what caused it. Beyond all reasonable doubt. Do you recall that SF tale where a man goes looking for the Creator and finds him propping up a bar in a remote and dull planet somewhere and says: "Oh Creator, please, why are we all born to suffer, and to die?" And the creator sighs, puts down his beer glass and says: "Well, why not?" -- Of what good are dead warriors? … Warriors are those who desire battle more than peace. Those who seek battle despite peace. Those who thump their spears on the ground and talk of honor. Those who leap high the battle dance and dream of glory … The good of dead warriors, Mother, is that they are dead. Sheri S Tepper: The Awakeners.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-03 10:14 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. |
| Message-ID | <irtvlrFq3p7U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #4664 |
On 10/3/2021 5:56 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 03/10/2021 06:15, whodat wrote: >> On 10/2/2021 11:49 PM, Branimir Maksimovic wrote: >>> On 2021-10-03, Jeff-Relf.Me @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote: >>>> You (Max) replied ( to me ): >>>>>> To be fair, I respect her decision; >>>>>> her new man was a better fit for her. >>>>> >>>>> Because *you beleived* it will happen :P >>>> >>>> No, it happened because I did _not_ believe she'd do it. >>> >>> You are LYING to YOURSELF ... >> >> Isn't this one of those "it doesn't matter" things? The underlying >> facts cannot ever be changed and there is no lesson to be learned >> that is usefully applicable to future events. > > Ah. The philosophical Problem of Induction. > > Given a result, establish what caused it. Beyond all reasonable doubt. > > Do you recall that SF tale where a man goes looking for the Creator and > finds him propping up a bar in a remote and dull planet somewhere and says: > > "Oh Creator, please, why are we all born to suffer, and to die?" > And the creator sighs, puts down his beer glass and says: > > "Well, why not?" :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-03 13:33 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: People like me, who work 30 years on a job, aren't cheating. |
| Message-ID | <sjct26$1bq$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #4581 |
On 10/2/2021 11:40 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > He _intentionally_ tossed the game. > > Of course he was fired, he was cheating. > > People like me, who work 30 years on a job, aren't cheating. > Bankers are crooks to begin with. They wouldn't mind you lurking in there for ever as long as you shut your mouth and did "whatever the heck" it was that you were doing for 30 years. Why don't you try your skills in a healthy real business. They'll take one look at your code and you're out. You'd indeed prefer not to work for now and a few years :) -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-03 11:56 -0700 |
| Subject | The loans-to-deposits ratio is insane, nothing a banker would want. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.3--11.56am.Seattle.2021> |
| In reply to | #4688 |
I didn't do it for the money. Working for "The (filthy rich) Bankers", ABA.COM, was a pure joy. The "Covid cult" guys control The Bankers, it's not their fault. The loans-to-deposits ratio is insane, nothing a banker would want. Negative interest rates, stagflation, U.S. Embassy hostages, VenezuelanStyle gas lines, empty shelves, Jimmy Carter 1980... ...it's all there. Again: The "Covid cult" guys liberated me from my shackles, "Squid Game" ( Netflix Korea ) style. I don't miss my (32 unit) rooming house manager job; I'm happy to do nothing now, next few years.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-03 19:55 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: People like me, who work 30 years on a job, aren't cheating. |
| Message-ID | <irv593F2ff3U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #4688 |
On 10/03/2021 12:33 PM, Clutterfreak wrote: > On 10/2/2021 11:40 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> He _intentionally_ tossed the game. >> >> Of course he was fired, he was cheating. >> >> People like me, who work 30 years on a job, aren't cheating. >> > > > Bankers are crooks to begin with. They wouldn't mind you lurking in > there for ever as long as you shut your mouth and did "whatever the > heck" it was that you were doing for 30 years. > > > Why don't you try your skills in a healthy real business. They'll take > one look at your code and you're out. You'd indeed prefer not to work > for now and a few years :) > > The president of our company has been known to ask 'What exactly does Bob Cratchit do?' In most cases Cratchit is doing a lot more than the boss thinks he is, the point being in smaller companies there is more scrutiny. In a large company if the question comes up the answer is 'It's not too clear what the hell Cratchit does but he has been doing it for 30 years. If we try to fire him now there will be hell to pay. He'll bitch about ageism, sexism, racism, and a few other isms and we'll look like fools for taking 30 years to figure out that with his mangled, unmaintainable code he is actually worse than useless.'
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-02 17:09 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: "Permies" aren't script kiddies. |
| Message-ID | <tn06J.31680$dI3.6020@fx10.iad> |
| In reply to | #4577 |
On 2021-10-02, Jeff-Relf.Me @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote: > "Permies" ( i.e. people keep their jobs for 30 years instead of 30 minutes ) > write _complex_ code -- we aren't script kiddies. > >> [ the complex app ] fell over two days before the race...again... > > That's why we have a multitude of experts & testers. Don't forget to throw in a few random users. It's amazing the sorts of inputs they'll come up with. You can have a system you've tested and tightened until it squeaks - hand it to one of those people and they'll break it in seconds. -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | Life is perverse. \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | It can be beautiful - X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | but it won't. / \ if you read it the right way. | -- Lily Tomlin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-02 11:35 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: "Permies" aren't script kiddies. |
| Message-ID | <irrjjjFc9f2U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #4577 |
On 10/02/2021 10:10 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > "Permies" ( i.e. people keep their jobs for 30 years instead of 30 minutes ) > write _complex_ code -- we aren't script kiddies. > >> [ the complex app ] fell over two days before the race...again... > > That's why we have a multitude of experts & testers. > You haven't met our QA head. She would tear your balls off if she thought you checked in code without bothering to test it and expected her department to clean up your mess.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-02 11:28 -0700 |
| Subject | My work got done joyously. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.2--11.28am.Seattle.2021> |
| In reply to | #4593 |
You (Bowman) replied ( to me ): > > > [ the complex app ] fell over two days before the race...again... > > > > That's why we have a multitude of experts & testers. > > You haven't met our QA head. She would tear your balls off if she > thought you checked in code without bothering to test it and expected > her department to clean up your mess. My work got done joyously, no one gots their balls cut off.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-03 01:31 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: My work got done joyously. |
| Message-ID | <EJ76J.132113$F26.102743@fx44.iad> |
| In reply to | #4600 |
On 2021-10-02, Jeff-Relf.Me @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote: > You (Bowman) replied ( to me ): >> > > [ the complex app ] fell over two days before the race...again... >> > >> > That's why we have a multitude of experts & testers. >> >> You haven't met our QA head. She would tear your balls off if she >> thought you checked in code without bothering to test it and expected >> her department to clean up your mess. > > My work got done joyously, no one gots their balls cut off. Who would pay you for unmaintanable code? -- 7-77-777 Evil Sinner! to weak you should be meek, and you should brainfuck stronger https://github.com/rofl0r/chaos-pp
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-01 20:44 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. |
| Message-ID | <irpvcsF2kj7U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #4546 |
On 10/01/2021 02:51 PM, Clutterfreak wrote: > Good programming requires sticking to the essentials. If it can be done > with an "if" statement never do it in any other way. If it can be done > with a simple loop, never do it by a recursive function. Stick to the > essentials and write it for others not for yourself when you're doing it > as a job. It belongs to the company that pays you, not to you. It is for > others to use. So as a person you have to meet certain criteria to be > able to do it right. It isn't just the ability to code. But tail recursion is kool or at least kooler than recursion.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-02 09:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. |
| Message-ID | <sj96hf$akt$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #4557 |
On 02/10/2021 03:44, rbowman wrote: > On 10/01/2021 02:51 PM, Clutterfreak wrote: >> Good programming requires sticking to the essentials. If it can be done >> with an "if" statement never do it in any other way. If it can be done >> with a simple loop, never do it by a recursive function. Stick to the >> essentials and write it for others not for yourself when you're doing it >> as a job. It belongs to the company that pays you, not to you. It is for >> others to use. So as a person you have to meet certain criteria to be >> able to do it right. It isn't just the ability to code. > > But tail recursion is kool or at least kooler than recursion. > I wrote a marvellous maze generation algorithm that called itself again and again until it had filled every square with a passage or a wall. And a multi level kitting analyser that allowed you to crate assemblies of sub assemblies of sub sub assemblies and so on. That called itself again and again until very level had been analysed. The problem of people creating sub assembles of parts containing themselves (Russells paradox) was prevented by as popup sayin 'you cant do that!') I LOVE recursion. -- “Puritanism: The haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy.” H.L. Mencken, A Mencken Chrestomathy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-02 12:55 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. |
| Message-ID | <irro9aFd6h9U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #4571 |
On 10/02/2021 02:50 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 02/10/2021 03:44, rbowman wrote: >> On 10/01/2021 02:51 PM, Clutterfreak wrote: >>> Good programming requires sticking to the essentials. If it can be done >>> with an "if" statement never do it in any other way. If it can be done >>> with a simple loop, never do it by a recursive function. Stick to the >>> essentials and write it for others not for yourself when you're doing it >>> as a job. It belongs to the company that pays you, not to you. It is for >>> others to use. So as a person you have to meet certain criteria to be >>> able to do it right. It isn't just the ability to code. >> >> But tail recursion is kool or at least kooler than recursion. >> > I wrote a marvellous maze generation algorithm that called itself again > and again until it had filled every square with a passage or a wall. > > And a multi level kitting analyser that allowed you to crate assemblies > of sub assemblies of sub sub assemblies and so on. That called itself > again and again until very level had been analysed. > > The problem of people creating sub assembles of parts containing > themselves (Russells paradox) was prevented by as popup sayin 'you cant > do that!') > > I LOVE recursion. > It has its place. We use ONC RPC/XDR. More technological debt since we powered down the last big-endian machine about 10 years ago. Anyway, it works so it's nothing we gave a lot of thought until mysterious crashes started occurring. Seem the internals are highly recursive when it's unraveling data and it was blowing the stack out. Luckily editbin allows you to increase the allowable stack size of an executable so we bumped it up.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-02 12:15 -0700 |
| Subject | Recursion makes good algorithms & bad implementations. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.2--0.15pm.Seattle.2021> |
| In reply to | #4607 |
> Luckily, editbin allows you to increase the allowable stack size > of an executable so we bumped it up. Recursion makes good algorithms & bad implementations. My "diff" ( file comparison ) routines are _notionally_ recursive; if they were _actually_ recursive, they'd be too slow. http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Diff.PNG "Longest Common Subsequence" pseudocode: https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/longest-common-subsequence-dp-4/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-03 01:33 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Recursion makes good algorithms & bad implementations. |
| Message-ID | <TL76J.132115$F26.111366@fx44.iad> |
| In reply to | #4612 |
On 2021-10-02, Jeff-Relf.Me @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote: >> Luckily, editbin allows you to increase the allowable stack size >> of an executable so we bumped it up. > > Recursion makes good algorithms & bad implementations. > > My "diff" ( file comparison ) routines are _notionally_ recursive; > if they were _actually_ recursive, they'd be too slow. > > http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Diff.PNG > > "Longest Common Subsequence" pseudocode: > > https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/longest-common-subsequence-dp-4/ Recursion is fast when ju do jmp instead of call... -- 7-77-777 Evil Sinner! to weak you should be meek, and you should brainfuck stronger https://github.com/rofl0r/chaos-pp
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-02 17:35 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. |
| Message-ID | <sjamr9$r9g$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #4557 |
On 10/1/2021 9:44 PM, rbowman wrote: > On 10/01/2021 02:51 PM, Clutterfreak wrote: >> Good programming requires sticking to the essentials. If it can be done >> with an "if" statement never do it in any other way. If it can be done >> with a simple loop, never do it by a recursive function. Stick to the >> essentials and write it for others not for yourself when you're doing it >> as a job. It belongs to the company that pays you, not to you. It is for >> others to use. So as a person you have to meet certain criteria to be >> able to do it right. It isn't just the ability to code. > > But tail recursion is kool or at least kooler than recursion. > Kool for sure, but perhaps confusing a bit for some secretaries compared to a simple loop using appropriate increments. And among all those various forms of loops themselves, I always stick to the "for" loop. I don't remember needing to use any other forms of looping in C++. But they're always there in programming books of any program, I don't know why. I see the same issue in cars. 1000 different forms of an alternator! All doing the same thing... Why not all cars using just same alternator so a lot of bullshit get cut? I mean if you want to be special and show off displaying what you can buy and use to others, do it; but how can one show off with his car's alternator? The fucking "engineers" brought all that shit into programming languages. Unnecessary crap. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-02 22:08 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. |
| Message-ID | <irsomsFiugoU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #4624 |
On 10/02/2021 04:35 PM, Clutterfreak wrote: > And among all those various forms of loops themselves, I always stick to > the "for" loop. I don't remember needing to use any other forms of > looping in C++. But they're always there in programming books of any > program, I don't know why. do/while is handy if you want the block to execute at least once as opposed to a while loop. for loops are fine if you're iterating something. Then there's the Javascript forEach... I recently had an situation where in TypeScript where with a for loop cat = cats[i] wouldn't pick up the cat structure but cats.forEach(cat => would. The catch is when you find the Siamese cat you can't break out of the loop, you have to iterate every damn cat. Or you can throw an exception but that's considered in poor taste.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 16 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.setup
csiph-web