Re: Better security?

Date	2015-05-14 02:36 +0200
From	Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org>
References	<3d95e21d7d759ab9937c657846d97008@remailer.privacy.at> <c4dc3e9acab4fe13c44f6cb1e765e1a8@remailer.cpunk.us>
Subject	Re: Better security?
Message-ID	<424f033807b26d02195d15a552e98b7e@hoi-polloi.org> (permalink)
Newsgroups	alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.comp.linux, alt.comp.os.linux, comp.os.linux.security
Organization	dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

In article <c4dc3e9acab4fe13c44f6cb1e765e1a8@remailer.cpunk.us>
Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> wrote:
>
> "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> wrote:
>
> >
> > How can you get greater anon than just posting Mixmin/QSL thru Tor?
>
>   You know for sure the QSL program you use corresponds with the
> presented source code?

Nope it doesn't.  I compiled it on linux beastro 1369.  Had to 
change a lot of things to get it to work the way I wanted it to. 
 Had a devil of a time modifying the code to send a copy of each 
message with a decoding certificate to a secret mail server in 
Utah.

Back to comp.os.linux.security | Previous | Next | Find similar

Thread

Re: Better security? Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2015-05-14 02:36 +0200

csiph-web