Re: VPN Security. How secure is really?

X-Received	by 10.50.78.136 with SMTP id b8mr38969670igx.4.1419803212039; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 13:46:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Received	by 10.182.211.112 with SMTP id nb16mr1664obc.18.1419803211774; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 13:46:51 -0800 (PST)
Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!h15no18665181igd.0!news-out.google.com!h6ni4819igv.0!nntp.google.com!h15no32152439igd.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.security
Date	Sun, 28 Dec 2014 13:46:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To	<87d8ac4b-7e9e-4274-8a30-5692caa97416@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To	groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info	glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=187.244.70.39; posting-account=UZqENgoAAABL2v9-cxloYVeDwoc_96cQ
NNTP-Posting-Host	187.244.70.39
References	<87d8ac4b-7e9e-4274-8a30-5692caa97416@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent	G2/1.0
MIME-Version	1.0
Message-ID	<1cd0c195-5bdd-407f-9f30-e359e5a85b65@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: VPN Security. How secure is really?
From	Jared Twyler <admin@intl-alliance.com>
Injection-Date	Sun, 28 Dec 2014 21:46:51 +0000
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref	csiph.com comp.os.linux.security:585

Show key headers only | View raw

On Monday, January 14, 2013 9:45:09 AM UTC-6, Ferrous Cranus wrote:
> VPN services state:
> Exactly, we provide our customers with a private, secure VPN tunnel, and we do not monitor nor retain logs pertaining to their connectivity, traffic, or activities. It's what keeps us in business.
> --------------------------------------
> 
> a) If one individual harrases on purpose another one? And for the sake of example lets say:
> 
> I use an anonymous mail service to KEEP sending mails to someone (for some reason) WHILE connected to their VPN.
> That person gets irritated and contacts the anonymous mail service about the annoying mails derived from their service and ask them to investigate further.
> The latter checks it's logging database and see clear that one of THEIR VPN gateways was used upon connecting to them.
> Then they ask them to detect that customer based on his usage and disclose personal information about him.
> What WILL they do? (please answer sincerely)
> 
> 
> b) Prior of their TAP driver execution, REAL ip address exist.
> How can we know for sure that they DO NOT ASSOCIATE ( ISP_ip_address <=> VPN_ip_address ) at the very moment we connect to their VPN service?
> 
> Also, as for the randonly_assigned_username, which cannot be modified, isn't that "username" what uniquely identifies each and every customer of theirs?
> 
> 
> p.s. I need some sincere answers to decide if i'am to be a regular customer. Please be sincere.
> 
> Thanks in advance.

Andorra (Residential ISP: Servei de Telecomunicacions d'Andorra)
Argentina (Residential ISP: Gigared, S.A.)
Brazil (Residential ISP: CTBC / Algar Telecom)
Canada (Residential ISP: Bell Canada)
Chile (Residential ISP: GTD Internet, S.A.)
China (Residential ISP: China Telecom)
Costa Rica (Residential ISP: Radiografica Costarricense)
Hungary (Residential ISP: Invitel Tavkozlesi Zrt.)
India (Residential ISP: Tata Communications)
Israel (Residential ISP: Bezeq International)
Italy (Residential ISP: Telecom Italia)
Italy (Residential ISP: Tiscali)
Italy (Residential ISP: KPNQ West Italia)
Mexico (Residential ISP: Iusacell)
New Zealand (Residential ISP: Voyager Internet, Ltd.)
Norway (Residential ISP: Altibox)
Panama (Residential ISP: Cable Onda)
Romania (Residential ISP: RCS & RDS)
Singapore (Residential ISP: Tata Communications)
Slovenia (Residential ISP: Tusmobil, D.O.O.)
South Africa (Residential ISP: Mweb)
Taiwan (Residential ISP: Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.)
United Arab Emirates (Residential ISP: Emirates Integrated Telecommunications Co.)

Residential VPN Services: https://www.intl-alliance.com/store/cart.php?gid=15
Residential Remote Desktops: https://www.intl-alliance.com/store/cart.php?gid=17
Residential SSHv2 Tunnels: https://www.intl-alliance.com/store/cart.php?gid=18

Back to comp.os.linux.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

VPN Security. How secure is really? Ferrous Cranus <nikos.gr33k@gmail.com> - 2013-01-14 07:45 -0800
  Re: VPN Security. How secure is really? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-01-14 17:42 +0000
    Re: VPN Security. How secure is really? Ferrous Cranus <nikos.gr33k@gmail.com> - 2013-01-14 12:02 -0800
      Re: VPN Security. How secure is really? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-01-14 20:10 +0000
        Re: VPN Security. How secure is really? Ferrous Cranus <nikos.gr33k@gmail.com> - 2013-01-14 22:58 -0800
          Re: VPN Security. How secure is really? Lew Pitcher <lpitcher@teksavvy.com> - 2013-01-23 10:06 -0500
  Re: VPN Security. How secure is really? Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2013-01-14 18:39 +0000
  Re: VPN Security. How secure is really? Jared Twyler <admin@intl-alliance.com> - 2014-12-28 13:46 -0800

csiph-web