Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.portable > #65
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, comp.os.linux.portable |
| Subject | Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) |
| Date | 2023-11-10 21:32 -0600 |
| Organization | Modern Human |
| Message-ID | <uimskt$1c2p5$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <uik1nq$1ajqf$1@solani.org> <rnhtki59jj3e5od59pnnqpu1se34dtsq42@4ax.com> <uimkrc$1bsd8$6@solani.org> <uiml36$1bsd8$7@solani.org> <2dmtkil1d7a2d86f3na0bprgn3djasmsko@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 11/10/23 19:36, Joel wrote: > Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> Booting my computer via Knoppix flash drive takes less than 1/10th of >>>>> the time compared to booting time in Windows 10 on the same computer. >>>> >>>> This seems meaningless, having a modern (2021 purchased) SSD/ >>>> motherboard, with fully up to date Win11. The amount of time, even on >>>> a cold boot, that it takes to load, is trivial. And PCI-e4 is >>>> standard, today, so I don't have the absolute best example to offer. >>>> That's how fast these things move, literally as a storage device, and >>>> in progress in tech. >>> >>> (sci.physics and portable linux added) >>> >>> It should not matter, I think. On your machine, compare the time it >>> takes for Knoppix on a flash drive to boot, to that of Windows 11 on >>> your internal SSD. The Knoppix I think should boot faster. > > > The post above refers to Win10, which is gigantic, as is 11, I see 11 > in current builds as merely the natural progression of bloat by M$. > So, given that one has to run up to date builds of either version, the > system requirements are in reality the same, 1 GHz 2-core 8th gen in > Intel terms, 4 GB RAM, realistically a SATA SSD is required for > adequate performance, NVMe preferred. > > So, yeah, Linux will definitely boot faster on something that *isn't* > maximized for performance today, which is PCI-e-based NVMe. > > >> I meant to say Knoppix on an external SSD using USB interface, not a >> flash drive. >> >> The difference should be machine-independent. I think on any machine, >> Knoppix boots faster than Windows. > > > Correct. > Anything I blabber in this thread is with the general public in mind. And generally I don't research beforehand, what I'm going to blabber about in a usenet forum. So this is all lounge talk for me. I don't think the general public has the newest best computers at home. Their computers are like their cars. In the streets, most cars are not new. And only once in a while you notice a Ferrari among them. Much more often than seeing Ferraris, you see cars 15 or even 20 years old. I think their computers at home are also like that. And I began this thread because I think Windows is kind of a cantankerous OS for the general public. Example. Last weekend, I installed Windows from scratch on an empty HDD in one of my computers to test a graphics card in Windows. I swear, by the time it was relatively ready for me, I had grown at least an extra 1/8th of an inch of beard on my face, and it'd gone way past my bed time. Next morning, it still wouldn't let me comfortably use it under bombardments of a hundred different non-essential features that it wanted to impose on me. It's the craziest computer experience that a member of general public has to go through at home. So Windows is not for the general public. Right now, I am testing Knoppix to see if that suffices. And if it does, then under what conditions and resources.
Back to comp.os.linux.portable | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Knoppix Operating System :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-08 18:11 -0600
Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Physfit Freak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-09 11:36 -0500
Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-09 19:41 -0600
Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-10 18:03 -0600
Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Physfit Freak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-11 18:54 -0500
Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-10 18:11 -0600
Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-16 18:19 -0600
Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-11-17 00:11 -0800
Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-17 19:32 -0600
Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-17 21:57 -0600
Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-10 19:19 -0600
Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-10 19:23 -0600
Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2023-11-10 20:36 -0500
Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-10 21:32 -0600
Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2023-11-11 11:57 -0500
Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-11 13:37 -0600
Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) candycanearter07 <no@thanks.net> - 2023-11-11 15:16 -0600
Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2023-11-11 16:51 -0500
Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2023-11-10 08:53 -0500
Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-10 18:01 -0600
csiph-web