Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.portable > #65

Re: Knoppix Operating System :-)

From Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, comp.os.linux.portable
Subject Re: Knoppix Operating System :-)
Date 2023-11-10 21:32 -0600
Organization Modern Human
Message-ID <uimskt$1c2p5$1@solani.org> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <uik1nq$1ajqf$1@solani.org> <rnhtki59jj3e5od59pnnqpu1se34dtsq42@4ax.com> <uimkrc$1bsd8$6@solani.org> <uiml36$1bsd8$7@solani.org> <2dmtkil1d7a2d86f3na0bprgn3djasmsko@4ax.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 11/10/23 19:36, Joel wrote:
> Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>>>> Booting my computer via Knoppix flash drive takes less than 1/10th of
>>>>> the time compared to booting time in Windows 10 on the same computer.
>>>>
>>>> This seems meaningless, having a modern (2021 purchased) SSD/
>>>> motherboard, with fully up to date Win11.  The amount of time, even on
>>>> a cold boot, that it takes to load, is trivial.  And PCI-e4 is
>>>> standard, today, so I don't have the absolute best example to offer.
>>>> That's how fast these things move, literally as a storage device, and
>>>> in progress in tech.
>>>
>>> (sci.physics and portable linux added)
>>>
>>> It should not matter, I think. On your machine, compare the time it
>>> takes for Knoppix on a flash drive to boot, to that of Windows 11 on
>>> your internal SSD. The Knoppix I think should boot faster.
> 
> 
> The post above refers to Win10, which is gigantic, as is 11, I see 11
> in current builds as merely the natural progression of bloat by M$.
> So, given that one has to run up to date builds of either version, the
> system requirements are in reality the same, 1 GHz 2-core 8th gen in
> Intel terms, 4 GB RAM, realistically a SATA SSD is required for
> adequate performance, NVMe preferred.
> 
> So, yeah, Linux will definitely boot faster on something that *isn't*
> maximized for performance today, which is PCI-e-based NVMe.
> 
> 
>> I meant to say Knoppix on an external SSD using USB interface, not a
>> flash drive.
>>
>> The difference should be machine-independent. I think on any machine,
>> Knoppix boots faster than Windows.
> 
> 
> Correct.
> 


Anything I blabber in this thread is with the general public in mind. 
And generally I don't research beforehand, what I'm going to blabber 
about in a usenet forum. So this is all lounge talk for me.

I don't think the general public has the newest best computers at home. 
Their computers are like their cars. In the streets, most cars are not 
new. And only once in a while you notice a Ferrari among them. Much more 
often than seeing Ferraris, you see cars 15 or even 20 years old. I 
think their computers at home are also like that.

And I began this thread because I think Windows is kind of a 
cantankerous OS for the general public.

Example. Last weekend, I installed Windows from scratch on an empty HDD 
in one of my computers to test a graphics card in Windows. I swear, by 
the time it was relatively ready for me, I had grown at least an extra 
1/8th of an inch of beard on my face, and it'd gone way past my bed 
time. Next morning, it still wouldn't let me comfortably use it under 
bombardments of a hundred different non-essential features that it 
wanted to impose on me. It's the craziest computer experience that a 
member of general public has to go through at home. So Windows is not 
for the general public.

Right now, I am testing Knoppix to see if that suffices. And if it does, 
then under what conditions and resources.


Back to comp.os.linux.portable | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Knoppix Operating System :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-08 18:11 -0600
  Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Physfit Freak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-09 11:36 -0500
    Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-09 19:41 -0600
      Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-10 18:03 -0600
        Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Physfit Freak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-11 18:54 -0500
      Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-10 18:11 -0600
        Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-16 18:19 -0600
          Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-11-17 00:11 -0800
            Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-17 19:32 -0600
          Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-17 21:57 -0600
      Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-10 19:19 -0600
        Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-10 19:23 -0600
          Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2023-11-10 20:36 -0500
            Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-10 21:32 -0600
              Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2023-11-11 11:57 -0500
                Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-11 13:37 -0600
                Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) candycanearter07 <no@thanks.net> - 2023-11-11 15:16 -0600
                Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2023-11-11 16:51 -0500
    Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2023-11-10 08:53 -0500
      Re: Knoppix Operating System :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-11-10 18:01 -0600

csiph-web