Re: (resolved) Re: very odd nfs behaviour

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	"Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Newsgroups	alt.os.linux.mint, comp.os.linux.networking, comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject	Re: (resolved) Re: very odd nfs behaviour
Date	Tue, 28 Jan 2025 12:34:42 +0100
Lines	15
Message-ID	<ivrm6lxt8f.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> (permalink)
References	<vn0gn0$2ajlc$1@dont-email.me> <wwvldv0rt9i.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> <vn89fh$10eh8$1@dont-email.me> <vn94jm$19o0q$9@dont-email.me> <vna35s$1maqb$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	individual.net i6YAhtsNiOtDGo5vj0hyggiTAvvvQmaJxC9k7YPWw2g+7ZEooD
X-Orig-Path	Telcontar.valinor!not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock	sha1:HgFwpYl9HLuNv+0g4VaIJOw6a9s= sha256:YD7C+GXoTbVnjX+c//JfcEcLBNSI1ryaxg138UrliYA=
User-Agent	Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language	es-ES, en-CA
In-Reply-To	<vna35s$1maqb$1@dont-email.me>
Xref	csiph.com alt.os.linux.mint:43972 comp.os.linux.networking:8541 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:4157

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

On 2025-01-28 09:06, Mike Scott wrote:
> On 27/01/2025 23:24, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>> On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 15:41:37 +0000, Mike Scott wrote:

...

> So I'll have to settle for 'it works now'. But as I noted, I'm very 
> discomforted that such a problem is even possible without errors being 
> flagged somewhere.

Maybe report to some bug tracker at the "distributions" involved.


-- 
Cheers, Carlos.

Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-24 16:56 +0000
  Re: very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-24 17:00 +0000
  Re: very odd nfs behaviour Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> - 2025-01-24 18:01 +0100
    Re: very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-24 17:30 +0000
  Re: very odd nfs behaviour Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-24 17:55 +0000
    (resolved) Re: very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-27 15:41 +0000
      Re: (resolved) Re: very odd nfs behaviour Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-27 23:24 +0000
        Re: (resolved) Re: very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-28 08:06 +0000
          Re: (resolved) Re: very odd nfs behaviour "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-28 12:34 +0100
          Re: (resolved) Re: very odd nfs behaviour pinnerite <pinnerite@gmail.com> - 2025-01-28 22:58 +0000
  Re: very odd nfs behaviour "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-24 22:56 +0100
    Re: very odd nfs behaviour Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-24 17:34 -0500
      Re: very odd nfs behaviour "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-25 01:45 +0100
    Re: very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-25 17:02 +0000
  Re: very odd nfs behaviour "Arti F. Idiot" <addr@is.invalid> - 2025-01-24 17:13 -0700
  Re: very odd nfs behaviour Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-26 00:01 +0000
  Re: very odd nfs behaviour Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2025-01-25 20:08 -0600

csiph-web