Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #8533

Re: very odd nfs behaviour

From "Arti F. Idiot" <addr@is.invalid>
Newsgroups alt.os.linux.mint, comp.os.linux.networking
Subject Re: very odd nfs behaviour
Date 2025-01-24 17:13 -0700
Organization Anarchists of America
Message-ID <vn1ab3$1vgr$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> (permalink)
References <vn0gn0$2ajlc$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 1/24/25 9:56 AM, Mike Scott wrote:
> A very odd situation here.
> 
> I have a (freebsd) server serving a tree of photos and information 
> files. It's large, and the paths quite long - whether that's relevant I 
> don't know.
> 
> On two of three machines all running mint at various versions all is 
> well; I have problems on the third, which happens to be my desktop box. 
> An example good listing would be (sorry about wrap):

<snip>

> The OS versions are different - I'm running mint 21.2, the VM is at 
> 21.3; while the others are both rather older versions (and different 
> hardware). The machines are all configured the same.
> 
> 
> I'm at a loss! Can anyone suggest what's going on here please? I'm sure 
> this used to work!

I'm sure you've already checked for aliased commands but if not..

Any chance the problem machine has a different filesystem, i.e. BTRFS ?
Delayed CoW processing of large NFS mounts could cause some weirdness.

Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-24 16:56 +0000
  Re: very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-24 17:00 +0000
  Re: very odd nfs behaviour Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> - 2025-01-24 18:01 +0100
    Re: very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-24 17:30 +0000
  Re: very odd nfs behaviour Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-24 17:55 +0000
    (resolved) Re: very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-27 15:41 +0000
      Re: (resolved) Re: very odd nfs behaviour Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-27 23:24 +0000
        Re: (resolved) Re: very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-28 08:06 +0000
          Re: (resolved) Re: very odd nfs behaviour "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-28 12:34 +0100
          Re: (resolved) Re: very odd nfs behaviour pinnerite <pinnerite@gmail.com> - 2025-01-28 22:58 +0000
  Re: very odd nfs behaviour "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-24 22:56 +0100
    Re: very odd nfs behaviour Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-24 17:34 -0500
      Re: very odd nfs behaviour "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-25 01:45 +0100
    Re: very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-25 17:02 +0000
  Re: very odd nfs behaviour "Arti F. Idiot" <addr@is.invalid> - 2025-01-24 17:13 -0700
  Re: very odd nfs behaviour Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-26 00:01 +0000
  Re: very odd nfs behaviour Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2025-01-25 20:08 -0600

csiph-web