Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #8533
| From | "Arti F. Idiot" <addr@is.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.os.linux.mint, comp.os.linux.networking |
| Subject | Re: very odd nfs behaviour |
| Date | 2025-01-24 17:13 -0700 |
| Organization | Anarchists of America |
| Message-ID | <vn1ab3$1vgr$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> (permalink) |
| References | <vn0gn0$2ajlc$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 1/24/25 9:56 AM, Mike Scott wrote: > A very odd situation here. > > I have a (freebsd) server serving a tree of photos and information > files. It's large, and the paths quite long - whether that's relevant I > don't know. > > On two of three machines all running mint at various versions all is > well; I have problems on the third, which happens to be my desktop box. > An example good listing would be (sorry about wrap): <snip> > The OS versions are different - I'm running mint 21.2, the VM is at > 21.3; while the others are both rather older versions (and different > hardware). The machines are all configured the same. > > > I'm at a loss! Can anyone suggest what's going on here please? I'm sure > this used to work! I'm sure you've already checked for aliased commands but if not.. Any chance the problem machine has a different filesystem, i.e. BTRFS ? Delayed CoW processing of large NFS mounts could cause some weirdness.
Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-24 16:56 +0000
Re: very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-24 17:00 +0000
Re: very odd nfs behaviour Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> - 2025-01-24 18:01 +0100
Re: very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-24 17:30 +0000
Re: very odd nfs behaviour Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-24 17:55 +0000
(resolved) Re: very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-27 15:41 +0000
Re: (resolved) Re: very odd nfs behaviour Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-27 23:24 +0000
Re: (resolved) Re: very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-28 08:06 +0000
Re: (resolved) Re: very odd nfs behaviour "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-28 12:34 +0100
Re: (resolved) Re: very odd nfs behaviour pinnerite <pinnerite@gmail.com> - 2025-01-28 22:58 +0000
Re: very odd nfs behaviour "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-24 22:56 +0100
Re: very odd nfs behaviour Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-24 17:34 -0500
Re: very odd nfs behaviour "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-25 01:45 +0100
Re: very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-25 17:02 +0000
Re: very odd nfs behaviour "Arti F. Idiot" <addr@is.invalid> - 2025-01-24 17:13 -0700
Re: very odd nfs behaviour Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-26 00:01 +0000
Re: very odd nfs behaviour Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2025-01-25 20:08 -0600
csiph-web