Re: very odd nfs behaviour

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	"Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Newsgroups	alt.os.linux.mint, comp.os.linux.networking
Subject	Re: very odd nfs behaviour
Date	Fri, 24 Jan 2025 22:56:30 +0100
Lines	16
Message-ID	<eted6lx2bv.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> (permalink)
References	<vn0gn0$2ajlc$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	individual.net QU38SjJmjUZ36TIY41LS8gwSKCQkWmRHufelZum3EcSnq9phlu
X-Orig-Path	Telcontar.valinor!not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock	sha1:THandacodkEJ4pn4PPYNFLV11UQ= sha256:nZY4ymIC4pzjKQ3H4yQ5oSx6oANWhwJarVjod0tZZhY=
User-Agent	Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language	es-ES, en-CA
In-Reply-To	<vn0gn0$2ajlc$1@dont-email.me>
Xref	csiph.com alt.os.linux.mint:43934 comp.os.linux.networking:8531

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

On 2025-01-24 17:56, Mike Scott wrote:
> A very odd situation here.
> 
> I have a (freebsd) server serving a tree of photos and information 
> files. It's large, and the paths quite long - whether that's relevant I 
> don't know.

If you are using nfs version 3, perhaps try version 4.
If version 4, what's in the exports file?

All client machines have the same fstab nfs entry?

-- 
Cheers, Carlos.

Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-24 16:56 +0000
  Re: very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-24 17:00 +0000
  Re: very odd nfs behaviour Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> - 2025-01-24 18:01 +0100
    Re: very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-24 17:30 +0000
  Re: very odd nfs behaviour Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-24 17:55 +0000
    (resolved) Re: very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-27 15:41 +0000
      Re: (resolved) Re: very odd nfs behaviour Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-27 23:24 +0000
        Re: (resolved) Re: very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-28 08:06 +0000
          Re: (resolved) Re: very odd nfs behaviour "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-28 12:34 +0100
          Re: (resolved) Re: very odd nfs behaviour pinnerite <pinnerite@gmail.com> - 2025-01-28 22:58 +0000
  Re: very odd nfs behaviour "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-24 22:56 +0100
    Re: very odd nfs behaviour Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-24 17:34 -0500
      Re: very odd nfs behaviour "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-25 01:45 +0100
    Re: very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-25 17:02 +0000
  Re: very odd nfs behaviour "Arti F. Idiot" <addr@is.invalid> - 2025-01-24 17:13 -0700
  Re: very odd nfs behaviour Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-26 00:01 +0000
  Re: very odd nfs behaviour Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2025-01-25 20:08 -0600

csiph-web