Re: very odd nfs behaviour

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	"Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Newsgroups	alt.os.linux.mint, comp.os.linux.networking
Subject	Re: very odd nfs behaviour
Date	Sat, 25 Jan 2025 01:45:25 +0100
Lines	28
Message-ID	<5qod6lx1b4.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> (permalink)
References	<vn0gn0$2ajlc$1@dont-email.me> <eted6lx2bv.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <vn14hc$2eg5f$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	individual.net azJC/Z4eTRifxgvhiCCJAQujCYKqHDN7X11+sF+N7TKxhis/x8
X-Orig-Path	Telcontar.valinor!not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock	sha1:XKVxLK+7eTxmetSf6PqODbC63E0= sha256:5Tfc2SqZV17oywInyZ+UemusVt6I63Jmy+i9w9sB4i4=
User-Agent	Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language	es-ES, en-CA
In-Reply-To	<vn14hc$2eg5f$1@dont-email.me>
Xref	csiph.com alt.os.linux.mint:43939 comp.os.linux.networking:8534

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

On 2025-01-24 23:34, Paul wrote:
> On Fri, 1/24/2025 4:56 PM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
>> On 2025-01-24 17:56, Mike Scott wrote:
>>> A very odd situation here.

...

> The FreeBSD have their own taste in software, so there's no reason
> for anything to particularly match Linux.
> 
> I would be examining the versions on the cases that work,
> and checking the versions in the non-working case.
> 
> In mo9dern times, some of the computers have "power management"
> and that could influence whether things like "stale mounts"
> are showing up. You would want to find a log and see if
> there is any sign of behaviors like that (mount malfunctions
> because the disk could not be accessed in time, like a stat()
> check).
> 
> Even your NIC can be set to power down when not in use.

I have seen nfs survive hibernation of the machines. It is quite resilient.

Then we typically forget about the "fsid= " number.

-- 
Cheers, Carlos.

Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-24 16:56 +0000
  Re: very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-24 17:00 +0000
  Re: very odd nfs behaviour Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> - 2025-01-24 18:01 +0100
    Re: very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-24 17:30 +0000
  Re: very odd nfs behaviour Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-24 17:55 +0000
    (resolved) Re: very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-27 15:41 +0000
      Re: (resolved) Re: very odd nfs behaviour Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-27 23:24 +0000
        Re: (resolved) Re: very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-28 08:06 +0000
          Re: (resolved) Re: very odd nfs behaviour "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-28 12:34 +0100
          Re: (resolved) Re: very odd nfs behaviour pinnerite <pinnerite@gmail.com> - 2025-01-28 22:58 +0000
  Re: very odd nfs behaviour "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-24 22:56 +0100
    Re: very odd nfs behaviour Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-24 17:34 -0500
      Re: very odd nfs behaviour "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-25 01:45 +0100
    Re: very odd nfs behaviour Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-01-25 17:02 +0000
  Re: very odd nfs behaviour "Arti F. Idiot" <addr@is.invalid> - 2025-01-24 17:13 -0700
  Re: very odd nfs behaviour Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-26 00:01 +0000
  Re: very odd nfs behaviour Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2025-01-25 20:08 -0600

csiph-web