Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #75764 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@usenet.mail.kapsi.fi> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-10-07 16:07 +0300 |
| Last post | 2025-10-12 12:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 362 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc
Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@usenet.mail.kapsi.fi> - 2025-10-07 16:07 +0300
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-07 14:39 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-07 22:52 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-08 01:35 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-08 10:53 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-08 21:06 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-09 21:25 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-09 21:45 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-09 21:41 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-10 09:21 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-10 13:21 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-10 21:15 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-10 21:53 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-11 02:46 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-11 02:38 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-09 02:09 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-10-09 18:52 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-09 21:33 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-10-11 15:10 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-11 17:48 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-11 19:01 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-11 19:08 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-11 19:32 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-11 22:29 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-10-12 11:07 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-13 09:06 -0700
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-10-18 16:24 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-10-18 21:02 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-19 01:36 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-19 13:39 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-20 02:10 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-20 05:36 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-20 02:33 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-20 02:31 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-20 19:21 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-10-19 12:17 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-19 02:22 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-19 04:28 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-19 11:19 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-20 09:20 -0700
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-10-25 12:49 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-25 16:45 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-25 22:16 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-26 01:51 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-26 04:40 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-26 08:42 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-26 09:11 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-26 10:06 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-26 19:25 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-26 19:48 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-26 21:29 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-27 00:44 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-26 00:57 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-26 07:14 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-26 11:05 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-26 02:00 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-26 11:02 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-25 22:03 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-25 21:19 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-26 01:50 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-26 04:40 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-26 14:52 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-26 19:06 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-26 20:29 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-26 21:22 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-26 22:17 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-27 10:09 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-27 21:23 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-28 00:47 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-28 00:27 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-28 07:45 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-28 23:05 +0000
Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-28 13:46 +0100
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-28 18:47 +0000
Re: Accents. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-28 20:21 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-28 23:46 +0100
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-29 01:41 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-29 11:07 +0000
Re: Accents. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-29 18:47 +0000
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-29 22:15 +0000
Re: Accents. Allodoxaphobia <trepidation@example.net> - 2025-10-30 17:29 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-30 17:31 +0000
Re: Accents. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-30 19:31 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-30 20:14 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-30 20:11 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-30 20:10 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-30 21:35 +0100
Re: Accents. candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-10-30 21:40 +0000
Re: Accents. Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-10-30 15:18 -0700
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 03:17 +0000
Re: Accents. Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-10-30 21:46 -0700
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 19:25 +0000
LED lights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:38 +0100
Re: LED lights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-01 20:50 -0400
Re: LED lights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-02 11:14 +0000
Re: LED lights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-02 15:41 +0100
Re: LED lights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 19:57 +0000
Re: LED lights Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-03 00:12 +0000
Re: LED lights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-03 02:38 +0100
Re: LED lights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-03 00:19 -0500
Re: LED lights Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-03 07:03 +0000
Re: LED lights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-03 14:20 -0500
Re: LED lights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-03 20:02 +0000
Re: LED lights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-04 04:42 +0000
Re: LED lights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-04 02:31 -0500
Re: LED lights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-03 10:16 +0000
Re: LED lights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 01:51 +0000
Re: LED lights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-02 15:48 +0100
Re: LED lights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 19:42 +0000
Re: LED lights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-02 21:33 +0100
Re: Accents. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-30 22:21 +0000
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-31 04:59 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-31 14:41 +0100
Re: Accents. John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-31 08:56 -0700
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 19:53 +0000
Re: Accents. Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-10-31 19:02 -0700
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-01 02:52 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-01 05:32 +0000
Re: Accents. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-11-19 19:19 +0000
TV tropes (was: Re: Accents.) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-20 11:01 +0000
Re: TV tropes "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-20 13:10 +0100
Re: TV tropes Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-20 17:57 +0000
Re: TV tropes "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-20 21:28 +0100
Re: TV tropes Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-11-21 02:10 +0000
Re: TV tropes "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-21 13:14 +0100
Re: TV tropes Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-11-21 02:09 +0000
Re: TV tropes rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-21 07:41 +0000
Re: TV tropes Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-11-21 09:00 +0000
Re: TV tropes The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-21 09:13 +0000
Re: TV tropes "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-21 13:17 +0100
Re: TV tropes rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-21 19:28 +0000
Re: TV tropes "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-21 20:43 +0100
Re: TV tropes The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-21 23:00 +0000
Re: TV tropes rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-22 04:06 +0000
Blade runner "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:24 +0100
Re: Not Blade Runner Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-01 19:57 +0000
Blade runner "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:22 +0100
Re: Blade runner rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 01:22 +0000
Re: Blade runner "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-02 15:50 +0100
Re: Blade runner rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 19:20 +0000
Re: Blade runner "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-02 21:34 +0100
Re: Blade runner rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-03 02:47 +0000
Re: Blade runner "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-03 13:05 +0100
Re: Blade runner rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-03 20:04 +0000
Re: Blade runner c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-03 15:40 -0500
Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-03 22:30 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-03 17:48 -0500
Re: Flashlights Ian <gay@sfuu.ca> - 2025-11-03 20:26 -0800
Re: Flashlights Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-11-04 04:55 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-04 02:35 -0500
Re: Flashlights Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-11-05 03:44 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 01:05 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-05 13:20 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 22:08 -0500
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-05 16:33 +0000
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-05 20:37 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 22:26 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-06 11:56 +0100
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-06 18:42 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-06 17:30 -0500
Re: Flashlights candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-11-07 16:20 +0000
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-07 18:11 +0000
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-07 18:50 +0000
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-07 22:42 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-07 21:08 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-08 13:31 +0100
Re: Flashlights Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-08 16:05 +0000
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-08 20:06 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-09 00:04 -0500
Re: Flashlights Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-09 20:08 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-10 00:41 -0500
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-10 12:07 +0000
Re: Flashlights John-Paul Stewart <jpstewart@personalprojects.net> - 2025-11-09 19:05 -0500
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-10 00:58 -0500
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 22:12 -0500
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-06 05:09 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-06 01:31 -0500
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-06 18:39 +0000
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-04 07:51 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-04 02:19 -0500
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-04 09:55 +0000
Re: Flashlights Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-11-21 18:16 +0000
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-21 20:39 +0100
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-21 22:54 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-21 23:52 -0500
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-21 23:32 -0500
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-22 06:49 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-22 03:14 -0500
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-22 11:32 +0000
Re: Flashlights Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-22 22:00 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-23 02:35 -0500
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-23 09:40 +0000
Re: Flashlights Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-23 20:15 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-23 22:10 -0500
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-23 01:42 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-23 22:09 +0100
Re: Flashlights Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-24 02:17 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-23 22:19 -0500
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-23 21:58 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-24 20:28 +0100
Re: Flashlights Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-24 15:04 -0800
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-24 22:48 -0500
Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-25 07:59 +0100
Re: Chemical photography c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-25 03:43 -0500
Re: Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-25 09:59 +0100
Re: Chemical photography Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-25 10:14 -0800
Re: Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-25 19:38 +0100
Re: Chemical photography Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-25 10:54 -0800
Re: Chemical photography rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-25 18:58 +0000
Re: Chemical photography Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-25 19:12 +0000
Re: Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-25 20:32 +0100
Re: Chemical photography "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-25 20:31 +0100
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-04 11:28 +0100
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-04 11:15 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-04 13:27 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-04 19:37 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-04 21:12 -0500
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-04 13:22 -0500
Re: Flashlights Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-04 20:52 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-04 21:23 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-05 13:23 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 22:10 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-06 12:05 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-06 17:21 -0500
Re: Flashlights Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-05 07:21 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 03:54 -0500
Re: Flashlights Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-11-21 18:20 +0000
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-04 09:52 +0000
Re: Flashlights Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-05 07:21 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 03:17 -0500
Re: Flashlights The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-05 11:54 +0000
Re: Flashlights rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-05 16:41 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 22:16 -0500
Re: Flashlights Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-05 22:22 +0000
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 22:41 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-06 12:10 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-06 17:24 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-07 02:44 +0100
Re: Flashlights c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-05 21:53 -0500
Re: Flashlights "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-04 11:12 +0100
Re: Blade runner "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-03 23:14 +0100
Re: Accents. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-11-19 19:01 +0000
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-31 23:19 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-01 05:33 +0000
Blade runner. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:29 +0100
Re: Blade runner. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-01 19:56 +0000
Re: Blade runner. c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-01 21:38 -0400
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:31 +0100
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 19:48 +0000
Re: Accents. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-31 22:45 +0000
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-31 23:22 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-30 21:33 +0100
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-30 22:20 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-30 23:36 +0100
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-31 04:51 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-31 14:48 +0100
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-31 15:03 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 20:15 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-01 11:15 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 00:39 +0000
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-31 23:26 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:44 +0100
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:05 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 00:54 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-02 11:15 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 19:02 +0000
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-01 20:10 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 00:49 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-02 11:13 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 18:48 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-03 10:12 +0000
Re: Accents. Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-03 20:04 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-04 04:28 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-03 13:11 +0100
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-03 12:26 +0000
Re: Accents. John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-11-03 09:17 -0800
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 14:42 +0100
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 20:01 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-01 11:15 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 00:33 +0000
Re: Accents. Don_from_AZ <djatechNOSPAM@comcast.net.invalid> - 2025-11-01 20:43 -0700
Re: Accents. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-02 19:30 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-03 02:21 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 03:47 +0000
Re: Accents. Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-10-30 22:48 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 03:58 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-31 08:25 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 20:09 +0100
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 03:29 +0000
Re: Accents. Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-10-30 21:50 -0700
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-31 08:28 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 19:29 +0000
Re: Accents. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-31 08:27 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-31 19:41 +0000
Re: Accents. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-31 22:45 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-01 05:36 +0000
Re: Accents. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-01 20:11 +0100
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-02 00:59 +0000
Re: Accents. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-28 18:54 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-28 09:34 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-10-26 13:53 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-10-26 15:40 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-26 19:11 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-11-02 14:03 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-26 22:20 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-27 08:29 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-11-02 14:11 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-02 14:15 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-03 02:37 +0100
OT -xRe: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-02 18:49 -0800
Re: OT -xRe: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-03 06:54 +0000
Re: OT -xRe: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-03 08:19 -0800
Re: OT -xRe: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-03 10:18 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-27 09:34 -0700
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-27 21:26 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-19 03:36 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-11 19:31 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-12 01:33 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-11 22:52 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-11 22:48 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-12 02:43 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-12 12:12 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-11 22:02 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-12 06:39 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-12 02:59 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-12 19:20 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-10-13 16:50 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-13 18:38 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-14 01:38 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-14 01:45 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-12 12:17 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-13 03:28 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-13 03:41 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-13 10:20 +0100
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-13 11:55 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-13 21:56 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-14 00:35 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-14 01:21 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-14 06:56 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-14 17:20 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-14 20:01 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-15 05:36 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-15 03:33 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-15 21:18 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-16 02:24 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-15 06:31 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-15 09:00 -0700
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-15 21:24 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-15 15:11 -0700
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-16 02:27 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-16 07:22 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-17 22:24 -0400
Lazarus [Was: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work?] "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-18 20:08 +0200
Re: Lazarus [Was: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work?] c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-19 04:15 -0400
Re: Lazarus [Was: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work?] "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-19 13:46 +0200
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-16 04:36 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-16 10:29 -0700
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-16 01:49 -0400
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-10-16 15:43 -0700
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-10-14 21:30 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-14 22:11 +0000
Re: Fancy-smanchy installers that don't work? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-12 12:10 +0100
Page 2 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 19 Next page →
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-11 19:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mkvnt4FdgtdU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #75947 |
On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 17:48:23 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On 2025-10-11, Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote: > >> Le 10-10-2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> a écrit : >> >>> Yea, great, half a zillion lines of HTML, PHP and fuckin' >>> JAVASCRIPT ........ >> >> You remind me of a good example of a difficult thing to translate. In >> French, I'm calling javascript: cacascript. Because in French caca >> means shit. So any French speaker reading/hearing cacascript can >> understand it's shit designing javascript. I have no idea how it could >> be translated in English because shitscript could be understood as any >> scripting language. > > We sometimes use "caca" to mean "shit" in English too. It's usually in > the context of babies, toilet training, etc. - but it makes a nice > enough fit that I just might start saying "cacascript" myself. It does retail the original syllabic pattern better than merdescript. That word does work rather well for Lake Merde though, to match lake Foul. The question is if anyone in the real world calls it ECMAScript?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-11 19:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <RWxGQ.75945$D_Tb.26022@fx47.iad> |
| In reply to | #75950 |
On 2025-10-11, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 17:48:23 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > >> On 2025-10-11, Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote: >> >>> Le 10-10-2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> a écrit : >>> >>>> Yea, great, half a zillion lines of HTML, PHP and fuckin' >>>> JAVASCRIPT ........ >>> >>> You remind me of a good example of a difficult thing to translate. In >>> French, I'm calling javascript: cacascript. Because in French caca >>> means shit. So any French speaker reading/hearing cacascript can >>> understand it's shit designing javascript. I have no idea how it could >>> be translated in English because shitscript could be understood as any >>> scripting language. >> >> We sometimes use "caca" to mean "shit" in English too. It's usually in >> the context of babies, toilet training, etc. - but it makes a nice >> enough fit that I just might start saying "cacascript" myself. > > It does retail the original syllabic pattern better than merdescript. That > word does work rather well for Lake Merde though, to match lake Foul. > > The question is if anyone in the real world calls it ECMAScript? That sounds like a painful skin disease. -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | Growth for the sake of \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | growth is the ideology X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | of the cancer cell. / \ if you read it the right way. | -- Edward Abbey
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-11 19:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <10cebd0$10h1p$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #75952 |
On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 19:08:33 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >> The question is if anyone in the real world calls it ECMAScript? > > That sounds like a painful skin disease. I wonder if the Noxzema cosmetics company uses it ...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-11 22:29 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <W-WcnRZsBfQ5j3b1nZ2dnZfqnPhj4p2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #75952 |
On 10/11/25 15:08, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On 2025-10-11, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 17:48:23 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >> >>> On 2025-10-11, Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote: >>> >>>> Le 10-10-2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> a écrit : >>>> >>>>> Yea, great, half a zillion lines of HTML, PHP and fuckin' >>>>> JAVASCRIPT ........ >>>> >>>> You remind me of a good example of a difficult thing to translate. In >>>> French, I'm calling javascript: cacascript. Because in French caca >>>> means shit. So any French speaker reading/hearing cacascript can >>>> understand it's shit designing javascript. I have no idea how it could >>>> be translated in English because shitscript could be understood as any >>>> scripting language. >>> >>> We sometimes use "caca" to mean "shit" in English too. It's usually in >>> the context of babies, toilet training, etc. - but it makes a nice >>> enough fit that I just might start saying "cacascript" myself. >> >> It does retail the original syllabic pattern better than merdescript. That >> word does work rather well for Lake Merde though, to match lake Foul. >> >> The question is if anyone in the real world calls it ECMAScript? > > That sounds like a painful skin disease. ICKmasScript would be more appropriate :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-12 11:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <68eb8c02$0$24822$426a74cc@news.free.fr> |
| In reply to | #75950 |
Le 11-10-2025, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> a écrit : > On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 17:48:23 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > >> On 2025-10-11, Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote: >> >>> Le 10-10-2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> a écrit : >>> >>>> Yea, great, half a zillion lines of HTML, PHP and fuckin' >>>> JAVASCRIPT ........ >>> >>> You remind me of a good example of a difficult thing to translate. In >>> French, I'm calling javascript: cacascript. Because in French caca >>> means shit. So any French speaker reading/hearing cacascript can >>> understand it's shit designing javascript. I have no idea how it could >>> be translated in English because shitscript could be understood as any >>> scripting language. >> >> We sometimes use "caca" to mean "shit" in English too. I didn't knew that. >> It's usually in the context of babies, toilet training, etc. It looks like it's something similar in French. The exact translation of shit in French is merde. Which is at the same time the designation of shit and everything that's related to it even if very loosely. Like a shitty situation, would be "une situation merdique" in French. But, it would have the same issue for designing javascript. >> - but it makes a nice >> enough fit that I just might start saying "cacascript" myself. > > It does retail the original syllabic pattern better than merdescript. Exactly. The use of merdescript like shitscript would loose the relation implying it speaks explicitly about javascript and not about any scripting language. The use of cacascript dosen't sound like a childish way to avoid the use of a slang term. It's obvious it's mandatory to keep the relation. -- Si vous avez du temps à perdre : https://scarpet42.gitlab.io
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-13 09:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <20251013090622.000067b0@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #75992 |
On 12 Oct 2025 11:07:46 GMT Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote: > >> We sometimes use "caca" to mean "shit" in English too. > > I didn't knew that. English *loves* to appropriate swear words from other languages. We have so many to choose from as a result that they've acquired a kind of informal scale-of-rudeness; even a comically innocent thing like "poppycock" is derived from the Dutch for "soft dung."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-18 16:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <10d0f0e$1u8bd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #75992 |
Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote: > Le 11-10-2025, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> a écrit : >> On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 17:48:23 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >> >>> On 2025-10-11, Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote: >>> >>>> Le 10-10-2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> a écrit : >>>> >>>>> Yea, great, half a zillion lines of HTML, PHP and fuckin' >>>>> JAVASCRIPT ........ >>>> >>>> You remind me of a good example of a difficult thing to translate. In >>>> French, I'm calling javascript: cacascript. Because in French caca >>>> means shit. So any French speaker reading/hearing cacascript can >>>> understand it's shit designing javascript. I have no idea how it could >>>> be translated in English because shitscript could be understood as any >>>> scripting language. >>> >>> We sometimes use "caca" to mean "shit" in English too. > > I didn't knew that. English has borrowed many words from many other languages, French included. "Caca" is likely an example of on that English has borrowed from French. English meaning is the same as in French: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/caca
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-18 21:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <68f40083$0$28050$426a74cc@news.free.fr> |
| In reply to | #76314 |
Le 18-10-2025, Rich <rich@example.invalid> a écrit : > Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote: >> Le 11-10-2025, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> a écrit : >>> On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 17:48:23 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >>> >>>> On 2025-10-11, Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Le 10-10-2025, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> a écrit : >>>>> >>>>>> Yea, great, half a zillion lines of HTML, PHP and fuckin' >>>>>> JAVASCRIPT ........ >>>>> >>>>> You remind me of a good example of a difficult thing to translate. In >>>>> French, I'm calling javascript: cacascript. Because in French caca >>>>> means shit. So any French speaker reading/hearing cacascript can >>>>> understand it's shit designing javascript. I have no idea how it could >>>>> be translated in English because shitscript could be understood as any >>>>> scripting language. >>>> >>>> We sometimes use "caca" to mean "shit" in English too. >> >> I didn't knew that. > > English has borrowed many words from many other languages, That, I know. For a fact, it's not limited to English. Every language which is existing and which has ever existed on earth has borrowed words for other languages. > French included. That, I know, too. Since I was born, I hear people afraid of the number of English words finding their way into French. But, it's only since a few years that I discovered how it works in the other way. I mean, I knew that not a so long time ago French had the same status English has today. But since a few years, reading not translated English authors, I can see that more French words find their way in English than what I knew. But... > "Caca" is likely an example of on that English has borrowed > from French. ...that doesn't mean I knew that this particular word had found his way into English. For example, some words/expressions like "à propos" and "et voilà". The funniest of them, for me, being "nom de plume". I have no clue about how it came into English because when I saw it in English texts, I was wondering. I mean, nobody in France was using those French words in this way. And now, I'm starting to see them in French texts, which clearly, to me, is an example of French words being used in French texts because they started to be used in English texts. And that's a real wonder to me. > English meaning is the same as in French: > > https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/caca Really: I wasn't doubting that. I was only stating the fact that I didn't knew that. -- Si vous avez du temps à perdre : https://scarpet42.gitlab.io
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-19 01:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <10d1fah$26iq3$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #76332 |
On 18 Oct 2025 21:02:59 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > Since I was born, I hear people afraid of the number of English > words finding their way into French. English was born out of, not one, but at least two separate episodes of hybridization/bastardization. The original Anglo-Saxon (“Old English”) was born out of a patois created by the Germanic peoples and the Danes in old Angle-land, so that they could understand each other. They had a lot of words in common, but the inflection systems were different. So to avoid confusion, they dropped (most of) the inflections altogether, and used prepositions instead. Then a few centuries later this acquired a layer of Norman French (to become “Middle English”), courtesy of William the Conqueror and his mates coming in and taking over the country. They were immigrants in France (Normandy) themselves, being only about third-generation descended from Vikings who were given land by the king of France to stop them looting and pillaging his country. The next stage was “Modern English”, which dates from roughly William Shakespeare’s time (yes, his language is considered “modern”, compared to what came before). That evolution was not from outside invaders, but more from picking up a wide range of international influences through cultural links and trade. > But, it's only since a few years that I discovered how it works in > the other way. I mean, I knew that not a so long time ago French had > the same status English has today. French was, and to some extent still is, the language of international diplomacy. This is why you see so many French words/phrases specifically used to refer to the functions of embassies and their staff: “attache”, “chef de mission”, “charge d’affaires” etc. Science-fiction writer Poul Anderson once wrote an essay (“Uncleftish Beholding”) as a school-level introduction to the basics of atomic theory. Only he wrote it using only words from Old English, assuming the subsequent conquests/evolutions had never happened, so the original Anglo-Saxon words had to be adapted as the basis for the scientific terms, instead of Latin, Greek, German etc as we actually do. You can read it here <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.language.artificial/c/ZL4e3fD7eW0/m/_7p8bKwLJWkJ>.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-19 13:39 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s8veslxk26.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #76335 |
On 2025-10-19 03:36, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > On 18 Oct 2025 21:02:59 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > ... >> But, it's only since a few years that I discovered how it works in >> the other way. I mean, I knew that not a so long time ago French had >> the same status English has today. > > French was, and to some extent still is, the language of international > diplomacy. This is why you see so many French words/phrases > specifically used to refer to the functions of embassies and their > staff: “attache”, “chef de mission”, “charge d’affaires” etc. > > Science-fiction writer Poul Anderson once wrote an essay (“Uncleftish > Beholding”) as a school-level introduction to the basics of atomic > theory. Only he wrote it using only words from Old English, assuming > the subsequent conquests/evolutions had never happened, so the > original Anglo-Saxon words had to be adapted as the basis for the > scientific terms, instead of Latin, Greek, German etc as we actually > do. You can read it here > <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.language.artificial/c/ZL4e3fD7eW0/m/_7p8bKwLJWkJ>. No, I can't! :-D I need a lot of notes, many words I don't get. -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-20 02:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <10d45nj$2tfd6$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #76372 |
On Sun, 19 Oct 2025 13:39:40 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote: > On 2025-10-19 03:36, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >> >> Science-fiction writer Poul Anderson once wrote an essay >> (“Uncleftish Beholding”) as a school-level introduction to the >> basics of atomic theory. Only he wrote it using only words from Old >> English, assuming the subsequent conquests/evolutions had never >> happened, so the original Anglo-Saxon words had to be adapted as >> the basis for the scientific terms, instead of Latin, Greek, German >> etc as we actually do. You can read it here >> <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.language.artificial/c/ZL4e3fD7eW0/m/_7p8bKwLJWkJ>. > > No, I can't! :-D I need a lot of notes, many words I don't get. There’s probably a full translation somewhere. Just a few random clues I can remember: * worldken -- science * firststuff -- chemical element * uncleft -- atom (cannot be cleft, i.e. divided) * bernstone -- I think this is amber, by analogy with the fact that “electron” comes from the Greek word for “amber”. So “forward bernstonish lading” is “postive electric charge”, “backwardladen” being “negatively charged”. * neitherbit -- neutron * sunstuff -- helium * sourstuff -- oxygen (c.f. German “sauerstoff”) * minglingken -- chemistry? * stuff -- matter * work -- energy * “Nor are stuff and work unakin. Rather, they are groundwise the same, and one can be shifted into the other. The kinship between them is that work is like unto weight manifolded by the fourside of the haste of light.” -- E = mc² (“fourside” = “square”) I think, given the Germanic core of Old English, somebody who knows German might have a better chance of guessing at the meanings of words ...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-20 05:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mlm025F8pfpU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #76396 |
On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 02:10:59 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > * sourstuff -- oxygen (c.f. German “sauerstoff”) fwiw hydrogen is Wasserstoff. Makes perfect sense. Burn hydrogen and you get water. No need to get fancy and involve the Greeks. iirc Strunk & White said to use good Anglo-Saxon words and avoid the fancy stuff.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-20 02:33 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <unGdnYT3CadQSmj1nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #76401 |
On 10/20/25 01:36, rbowman wrote: > On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 02:10:59 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > >> * sourstuff -- oxygen (c.f. German “sauerstoff”) > > fwiw hydrogen is Wasserstoff. Makes perfect sense. Burn hydrogen and you > get water. No need to get fancy and involve the Greeks. iirc Strunk & > White said to use good Anglo-Saxon words and avoid the fancy stuff. KISS - best policy. Of course if you get your paycheck from over-complication .....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-20 02:31 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <unGdnYX3CafUSmj1nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #76396 |
On 10/19/25 22:10, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > On Sun, 19 Oct 2025 13:39:40 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote: > >> On 2025-10-19 03:36, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >>> >>> Science-fiction writer Poul Anderson once wrote an essay >>> (“Uncleftish Beholding”) as a school-level introduction to the >>> basics of atomic theory. Only he wrote it using only words from Old >>> English, assuming the subsequent conquests/evolutions had never >>> happened, so the original Anglo-Saxon words had to be adapted as >>> the basis for the scientific terms, instead of Latin, Greek, German >>> etc as we actually do. You can read it here >>> <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.language.artificial/c/ZL4e3fD7eW0/m/_7p8bKwLJWkJ>. >> >> No, I can't! :-D I need a lot of notes, many words I don't get. > > There’s probably a full translation somewhere. Just a few random clues > I can remember: > > * worldken -- science > * firststuff -- chemical element > * uncleft -- atom (cannot be cleft, i.e. divided) > * bernstone -- I think this is amber, by analogy with the fact that > “electron” comes from the Greek word for “amber”. So “forward > bernstonish lading” is “postive electric charge”, “backwardladen” > being “negatively charged”. > * neitherbit -- neutron > * sunstuff -- helium > * sourstuff -- oxygen (c.f. German “sauerstoff”) > * minglingken -- chemistry? > * stuff -- matter > * work -- energy > * “Nor are stuff and work unakin. Rather, they are groundwise the > same, and one can be shifted into the other. The kinship between > them is that work is like unto weight manifolded by the fourside of > the haste of light.” -- E = mc² (“fourside” = “square”) > > I think, given the Germanic core of Old English, somebody who knows > German might have a better chance of guessing at the meanings of words > The guy WAS ultra-smart ... however THAT take on things was just WEIRD.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-20 19:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mlnge6Fgob9U5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #76407 |
On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 02:31:36 -0400, c186282 wrote: > The guy WAS ultra-smart ... however THAT take on things was just > WEIRD. I recently got an Anderson collection as an ebook. One of the first stories is from the early '50s. A guy invents a very efficient battery, for lack of a better word, that can be inexpensively produced from common materials. One of the first uses is the neighborhood hot rodder who sets up a cottage industry converting cars to electric motors. The technology solves many other problems involving electrical energy storage. The story does not end well. His wife was no slouch either. Her solo works never got as much exposure but several of the stories in the book were collaborations.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-19 12:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <68f4d6c4$0$12928$426a74cc@news.free.fr> |
| In reply to | #76335 |
Le 19-10-2025, Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> a écrit : > On 18 Oct 2025 21:02:59 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > >> But, it's only since a few years that I discovered how it works in >> the other way. I mean, I knew that not a so long time ago French had >> the same status English has today. > > French was, and to some extent still is, the language of international > diplomacy. One day, I'll live in theory because in theory, everything happens as expected. Yes, it was true. I mean, in theory, it's still the case, in practice, well, I'm not yet living in theory. > This is why you see so many French words/phrases specifically used to > refer to the functions of embassies and their staff: “attache”, “chef > de mission”, “charge d’affaires” etc. I really believe those words/phrases came when French was still the lingua franca of the world. Not so long ago, French was still used in the English and in the Russian courts. But not anymore. > Science-fiction writer Poul Anderson once wrote an essay (“Uncleftish > Beholding”) as a school-level introduction to the basics of atomic > theory. Only he wrote it using only words from Old English, assuming > the subsequent conquests/evolutions had never happened, so the > original Anglo-Saxon words had to be adapted as the basis for the > scientific terms, instead of Latin, Greek, German etc as we actually > do. You can read it here ><https://groups.google.com/g/alt.language.artificial/c/ZL4e3fD7eW0/m/_7p8bKwLJWkJ>. Well, I could read it, but to understand it would be another matter. -- Si vous avez du temps à perdre : https://scarpet42.gitlab.io
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-19 02:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mlj0aiFnjprU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #76332 |
On 18 Oct 2025 21:02:59 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > That, I know, too. Since I was born, I hear people afraid of the number > of English words finding their way into French. But, it's only since a > few years that I discovered how it works in the other way. I mean, I > knew that not a so long time ago French had the same status English has > today. But since a few years, reading not translated English authors, I > can see that more French words find their way in English than what I > knew. But... iirc in Dostoevsky's satire, 'The Demons' (or 'The Possessed' or 'The Devils') some of the characters salt their speech with French phrases to show how hip and Western they are. Quebec French words found their way into the states bordering Quebec. Many people in that area either go out of their way to mispronounce them or don't have a clue about the French pronunciation.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-19 04:28 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <kY-cnTH8wb6GPGn1nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #76339 |
On 10/18/25 22:22, rbowman wrote: > On 18 Oct 2025 21:02:59 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > >> That, I know, too. Since I was born, I hear people afraid of the number >> of English words finding their way into French. But, it's only since a >> few years that I discovered how it works in the other way. I mean, I >> knew that not a so long time ago French had the same status English has >> today. But since a few years, reading not translated English authors, I >> can see that more French words find their way in English than what I >> knew. But... > > iirc in Dostoevsky's satire, 'The Demons' (or 'The Possessed' or 'The > Devils') some of the characters salt their speech with French phrases to > show how hip and Western they are. > > Quebec French words found their way into the states bordering Quebec. Many > people in that area either go out of their way to mispronounce them or > don't have a clue about the French pronunciation. Chomsky, though a terrible commie, WAS largely right about the linguistics involved. Static languages DIE. They have to evolve.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-19 11:19 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <10d2dvm$2dnk0$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #76339 |
On 19/10/2025 03:22, rbowman wrote: > iirc in Dostoevsky's satire, 'The Demons' (or 'The Possessed' or 'The > Devils') some of the characters salt their speech with French phrases to > show how hip and Western they are. > > Quebec French words found their way into the states bordering Quebec. Many > people in that area either go out of their way to mispronounce them or > don't have a clue about the French pronunciation. In England French was always the second language of the upper classes which was handy if you wanted to say something 'pas devant les domestiques...'. Juts as Latin was handy for edicated people to communicate in without frightening the plebs. -- “Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies.” ― Groucho Marx
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-20 09:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <20251020092029.000020b3@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #76332 |
On 18 Oct 2025 21:02:59 GMT Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote: > ...that doesn't mean I knew that this particular word had found his > way into English. For example, some words/expressions like "à propos" > and "et voilà". The funniest of them, for me, being "nom de plume". I > have no clue about how it came into English because when I saw it in > English texts, I was wondering. I mean, nobody in France was using > those French words in this way. I'd be interested to know for sure, but I'd bet that any such - what would you call that, 'frankicisms?' - in English that don't reflect normal French usage stem from French retaining cultural cachet in the Anglophone world 'til well into the first half of the 20th century, even after it was no longer the global lingua franca. "Nom de plume," f'rexample, is cited by Wiktionary as being coined in English by analogy to "nom de guerre," which *is* a native French expression. English does use the literal rendering "pen name" more commonly, but the French version still sees use essentially because it "sounds cool" to deploy foreign words - the same reason you see gratuitous (and frequently nonsensical) English in Japanese media.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 19 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web