Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #76209 > unrolled thread
| Started by | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-10-15 21:39 +0000 |
| Last post | 2025-10-21 15:33 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 79 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc
Framework Steps Into It rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-15 21:39 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2025-10-16 21:37 +0200
Re: Framework Steps Into It rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-17 01:52 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It Jason H <jason_hindle@yahoo.com> - 2025-10-17 21:08 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2025-10-18 08:20 +0200
Re: Framework Steps Into It Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-18 06:33 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-18 19:40 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2025-10-22 06:41 +0200
Re: Framework Steps Into It Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-22 21:46 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-10-25 12:52 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-25 16:46 +0100
Re: Framework Steps Into It The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-18 10:37 +0100
Re: Framework Steps Into It Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2025-10-19 21:19 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-20 17:05 +0100
Re: Framework Steps Into It Borax Man <boraxman@geidiprime.invalid> - 2025-10-21 12:00 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-10-21 13:37 +0100
Re: Framework Steps Into It The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-21 15:37 +0100
Re: Framework Steps Into It rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-21 19:26 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-22 11:35 +0100
Re: Framework Steps Into It Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-10-22 14:34 +0100
Re: Framework Steps Into It rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-22 20:41 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-10-22 15:18 -0700
Re: Framework Steps Into It The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-23 08:57 +0100
Re: Framework Steps Into It rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-23 20:16 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-10-23 20:30 -0700
Re: Framework Steps Into It rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-24 05:28 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-10-23 23:09 -0700
Re: Framework Steps Into It rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-24 18:50 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-24 10:13 +0100
Re: Framework Steps Into It Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-10-24 10:25 +0100
Re: Framework Steps Into It The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-24 11:51 +0100
Re: Framework Steps Into It Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-10-24 17:06 +0100
Re: Framework Steps Into It rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-24 19:02 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-25 10:38 +0100
Re: Framework Steps Into It rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-24 18:54 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-24 21:09 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It Joerg Walther <joerg.walther@magenta.de> - 2025-10-25 10:45 +0200
Re: Framework Steps Into It The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-25 10:43 +0100
Re: Framework Steps Into It Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-10-23 08:54 +0100
Re: Framework Steps Into It Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-22 18:03 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-22 20:38 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-21 22:55 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-10-22 14:15 +0100
Re: Framework Steps Into It Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-22 21:48 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-10-23 09:12 +0100
Re: Framework Steps Into It Borax Man <boraxman@geidiprime.invalid> - 2025-10-23 10:11 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-23 20:10 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-23 21:00 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-10-24 09:44 +0100
Re: Framework Steps Into It Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-24 20:42 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-24 23:01 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-25 01:05 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It Borax Man <boraxman@geidiprime.invalid> - 2025-10-22 11:31 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-22 12:51 +0100
Re: Framework Steps Into It Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-23 00:08 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-10-23 04:01 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It Borax Man <boraxman@geidiprime.invalid> - 2025-10-23 10:09 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-10-23 09:59 -0700
Re: Framework Steps Into It The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-23 18:55 +0100
Re: Framework Steps Into It "Rinaldi J. Montessi" <rinaldij@dev.null> - 2025-10-23 13:29 -0500
Re: Framework Steps Into It rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-23 20:14 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-10-23 20:47 -0700
Re: Framework Steps Into It The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-24 10:14 +0100
Re: Framework Steps Into It rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-24 18:44 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-10-24 12:55 -0700
Re: Framework Steps Into It rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-25 02:05 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-10-24 21:45 -0700
Re: Framework Steps Into It "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-10-25 15:06 +0200
Re: Framework Steps Into It rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-25 19:55 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-10-25 14:45 -0700
Re: Framework Steps Into It Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-26 01:37 +0100
Re: Framework Steps Into It Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-10-25 21:01 -0700
Re: Framework Steps Into It rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-26 02:10 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-10-25 21:13 -0700
Re: Framework Steps Into It rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-10-26 07:22 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-24 20:43 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-23 21:03 +0000
Re: Framework Steps Into It c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-10-23 00:08 -0400
Re: Framework Steps Into It The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-21 15:33 +0100
Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 Next page →
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-22 20:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mlstruF3gmnU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #76535 |
On Wed, 22 Oct 2025 14:34:43 +0100, Pancho wrote: > Personally, I think they are right. I think there is something wrong > with our current political system. Big money/lobbying has too much > influence. Free speech is being stifled. I can agree with that. However the No Kings thing is also sponsored by big money that I want no part of.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-22 15:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <10dbl7c$ujr8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #76547 |
On 10/22/25 13:41, rbowman wrote: > On Wed, 22 Oct 2025 14:34:43 +0100, Pancho wrote: > > >> Personally, I think they are right. I think there is something wrong >> with our current political system. Big money/lobbying has too much >> influence. Free speech is being stifled. > > I can agree with that. However the No Kings thing is also sponsored by big > money that I want no part of. What big money is that? What is wrong with the government is that while the founders and writers of the Constitution were ethical white men of that time they failed to consider that parties which would send felons to high office would exist. The Constitution must be amended to provide protection against such events in the future. A man not owning a home who seeks no building permit but hires a firm and set them to work to demolish half of the building to make was for his very large ballroom. That ballroom by the way has been panned by critics already. Some have said the next President will have to tear it down. If it is built then we should find some use for it. He has already destroyed lovely details of the East Wing. But he disregards the laws concerning such projects as he did the proper sums on financial reports. bliss
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-23 08:57 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <10dcn5j$1fbq0$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #76555 |
On 22/10/2025 23:18, Bobbie Sellers wrote: > > > On 10/22/25 13:41, rbowman wrote: >> On Wed, 22 Oct 2025 14:34:43 +0100, Pancho wrote: >> >> >>> Personally, I think they are right. I think there is something wrong >>> with our current political system. Big money/lobbying has too much >>> influence. Free speech is being stifled. >> >> I can agree with that. However the No Kings thing is also sponsored by >> big >> money that I want no part of. > > What big money is that? > What is wrong with the government is that while the founders and > writers > of the Constitution were ethical white men of that time they failed to > consider > that parties which would send felons to high office would exist. > The Constitution must be amended to provide protection against such > events in the future. > > A man not owning a home who seeks no building permit but hires a firm > and set them to work to demolish half of the building to make was for his > very large ballroom. > That ballroom by the way has been panned by critics already. > Some have said the next President will have to tear it down. If it > is built > then we should find some use for it. He has already destroyed lovely > details of the East Wing. > But he disregards the laws concerning such projects as he did the > proper > sums on financial reports. > > bliss > Just because Donald is a cunt doesn't mean that the democrats are angels -- “People believe certain stories because everyone important tells them, and people tell those stories because everyone important believes them. Indeed, when a conventional wisdom is at its fullest strength, one’s agreement with that conventional wisdom becomes almost a litmus test of one’s suitability to be taken seriously.” Paul Krugman
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-23 20:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mlvgoeFgc64U11@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #76555 |
On Wed, 22 Oct 2025 15:18:20 -0700, Bobbie Sellers wrote: > > On 10/22/25 13:41, rbowman wrote: >> On Wed, 22 Oct 2025 14:34:43 +0100, Pancho wrote: >> >> >>> Personally, I think they are right. I think there is something wrong >>> with our current political system. Big money/lobbying has too much >>> influence. Free speech is being stifled. >> >> I can agree with that. However the No Kings thing is also sponsored by >> big money that I want no part of. > > What big money is that? Are you naive enough to think Indivisible runs on school kid's dimes and quarters?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-23 20:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <10dersj$2aq7j$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #76598 |
On 10/23/25 13:16, rbowman wrote: > On Wed, 22 Oct 2025 15:18:20 -0700, Bobbie Sellers wrote: > > >> >> On 10/22/25 13:41, rbowman wrote: >>> On Wed, 22 Oct 2025 14:34:43 +0100, Pancho wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Personally, I think they are right. I think there is something wrong >>>> with our current political system. Big money/lobbying has too much >>>> influence. Free speech is being stifled. >>> >>> I can agree with that. However the No Kings thing is also sponsored by >>> big money that I want no part of. >> >> What big money is that? > > Are you naive enough to think Indivisible runs on school kid's dimes and > quarters? I don't know anything about the finances of the majority of the organizations and individuals seeking office except that they are working on bad information when they solicit me, which included DJT which came with the opportunity to tell him what I think of his behavior in no uncertain terms. Again if you are going to make remarks like "big money: it seems you should provide some real information rather then simply saying it is so. bliss - well when the FBI straightens its priorities they might be coming to take me away. Ha, Ha, HO, Ho to the prison dark or the dungeon deep. When I drop dead in their custody they will wish they had left me alone.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-24 05:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mm0h4gFm6jsU8@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #76610 |
On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 20:30:25 -0700, Bobbie Sellers wrote: > Again if you are going to make remarks like "big money: it seems > you should provide some real information rather then simply saying it is > so. https://www.opensecrets.org/political-action-committees-pacs/indivisible- action/C00678839/donors/2024 Indivisible gave 2 million to itself. Okay. It probably would be easier to unravel the finances of the Sinaloa Cartel that to trace the dark money back. Indivisible is only one of the many No Kings 'partners' that inspire the useful idiots to take part in their highly coordinated 'grassroots' protests. What a fucking basket of deplorables, to use Madame Pantsuit's terms.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-23 23:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <10df57k$2d8kq$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #76614 |
On 10/23/25 22:28, rbowman wrote: > On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 20:30:25 -0700, Bobbie Sellers wrote: > >> Again if you are going to make remarks like "big money: it seems >> you should provide some real information rather then simply saying it is >> so. > > https://www.opensecrets.org/political-action-committees-pacs/indivisible- > action/C00678839/donors/2024 > > Indivisible gave 2 million to itself. Okay. It probably would be easier to > unravel the finances of the Sinaloa Cartel that to trace the dark money > back. > > Indivisible is only one of the many No Kings 'partners' that inspire the > useful idiots to take part in their highly coordinated 'grassroots' > protests. > > What a fucking basket of deplorables, to use Madame Pantsuit's terms. Less deplorable than a man like Mr.Trump criming all over the place as he attempts to destroy the Federal Government by de-funding agencies to whom he has almost deliberately appointed incompetents. The Secretary of State Rubio(?) seems competent but the rest are simply the wrong people in the wrong place and in the case of Hedseth the worst man for the job it seems. I cannot go out and March as I did in my youth or I would have been out there at the "No Kings Rally" and if you believe in the US Founding you would have been there too. We have a weak Congress and a President who arrogates to himself the Power of the Purse, re-directing the funding of agencies and setting up a national police force in ICE with very little accountability. Now he is suing the USA for investigations conducted in the past into his affairs and connection to slimy Putin. For a big slice of the Tax Payers cash. Less than a quarter of a billion dollars and cheap at the price of the decision put in the hands of his former defense lawyers. Executive Orders generally do not have the force of law but he is using them as if they were law. bliss - United State of Anarchy is what they want, free to deal with the poor and the working class as they please.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-24 18:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mm204dFtktmU8@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #76617 |
On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 23:09:53 -0700, Bobbie Sellers wrote: > I cannot go out and March as I did in my youth or I would have been out > there at the "No Kings Rally" and if you believe in the US Founding you > would have been there too. I didn't march in my youth (except in the military) and I sure as hell am not marching with that passel of assholes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gv1KEF8Uw2k
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-24 10:13 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <10dfg09$2fq9e$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #76610 |
On 24/10/2025 04:30, Bobbie Sellers wrote: > > > On 10/23/25 13:16, rbowman wrote: >> On Wed, 22 Oct 2025 15:18:20 -0700, Bobbie Sellers wrote: >> >> >>> >>> On 10/22/25 13:41, rbowman wrote: >>>> On Wed, 22 Oct 2025 14:34:43 +0100, Pancho wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Personally, I think they are right. I think there is something wrong >>>>> with our current political system. Big money/lobbying has too much >>>>> influence. Free speech is being stifled. >>>> >>>> I can agree with that. However the No Kings thing is also sponsored by >>>> big money that I want no part of. >>> >>> What big money is that? >> >> Are you naive enough to think Indivisible runs on school kid's dimes and >> quarters? > > I don't know anything about the finances of the majority of the > organizations and individuals seeking office except that they are working > on bad information when they solicit me, which included DJT which > came with the opportunity to tell him what I think of his behavior in > no uncertain terms. > > Again if you are going to make remarks like "big money: it seems > you should provide some real information rather then simply saying it is > so. > > bliss - well when the FBI straightens its priorities they might be > coming > to take me away. Ha, Ha, HO, Ho to the prison dark or the dungeon deep. > When I drop dead in their custody they will wish they had left me alone. > > > Its like her during and after Brexit, The 'we love Europe' parades had chartered busses, pre printed T shirts and leaflets etc etc. The pro brexit rallies just had people with hand printed signs or not signs at all. -- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. -- Yogi Berra
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-24 10:25 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <10dfgmq$2g1rh$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #76626 |
On 10/24/25 10:13, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 24/10/2025 04:30, Bobbie Sellers wrote: >> >> >> On 10/23/25 13:16, rbowman wrote: >>> On Wed, 22 Oct 2025 15:18:20 -0700, Bobbie Sellers wrote: >>> >>> >>>> >>>> On 10/22/25 13:41, rbowman wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 22 Oct 2025 14:34:43 +0100, Pancho wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Personally, I think they are right. I think there is something wrong >>>>>> with our current political system. Big money/lobbying has too much >>>>>> influence. Free speech is being stifled. >>>>> >>>>> I can agree with that. However the No Kings thing is also sponsored by >>>>> big money that I want no part of. >>>> >>>> What big money is that? >>> >>> Are you naive enough to think Indivisible runs on school kid's dimes and >>> quarters? >> >> I don't know anything about the finances of the majority of the >> organizations and individuals seeking office except that they are working >> on bad information when they solicit me, which included DJT which >> came with the opportunity to tell him what I think of his behavior in >> no uncertain terms. >> >> Again if you are going to make remarks like "big money: it seems >> you should provide some real information rather then simply saying it >> is so. >> >> bliss - well when the FBI straightens its priorities they might >> be coming >> to take me away. Ha, Ha, HO, Ho to the prison dark or the dungeon deep. >> When I drop dead in their custody they will wish they had left me alone. >> >> >> > Its like her during and after Brexit, The 'we love Europe' parades had > chartered busses, pre printed T shirts and leaflets etc etc. > The pro brexit rallies just had people with hand printed signs or not > signs at all. > There are loads of England flags on the lampposts around here, someone paid for them. I think something to do with Tommy Robinson. I'm not quite clear what the political point of them is? However, they actually look quite pretty, a pleasant change from the normal Christmas decorations.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-24 11:51 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <10dflmn$2hibs$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #76628 |
On 24/10/2025 10:25, Pancho wrote: > On 10/24/25 10:13, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 24/10/2025 04:30, Bobbie Sellers wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 10/23/25 13:16, rbowman wrote: >>>> On Wed, 22 Oct 2025 15:18:20 -0700, Bobbie Sellers wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 10/22/25 13:41, rbowman wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 22 Oct 2025 14:34:43 +0100, Pancho wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Personally, I think they are right. I think there is something wrong >>>>>>> with our current political system. Big money/lobbying has too much >>>>>>> influence. Free speech is being stifled. >>>>>> >>>>>> I can agree with that. However the No Kings thing is also >>>>>> sponsored by >>>>>> big money that I want no part of. >>>>> >>>>> What big money is that? >>>> >>>> Are you naive enough to think Indivisible runs on school kid's dimes >>>> and >>>> quarters? >>> >>> I don't know anything about the finances of the majority of the >>> organizations and individuals seeking office except that they are >>> working >>> on bad information when they solicit me, which included DJT which >>> came with the opportunity to tell him what I think of his behavior in >>> no uncertain terms. >>> >>> Again if you are going to make remarks like "big money: it seems >>> you should provide some real information rather then simply saying it >>> is so. >>> >>> bliss - well when the FBI straightens its priorities they might >>> be coming >>> to take me away. Ha, Ha, HO, Ho to the prison dark or the dungeon deep. >>> When I drop dead in their custody they will wish they had left me alone. >>> >>> >>> >> Its like her during and after Brexit, The 'we love Europe' parades had >> chartered busses, pre printed T shirts and leaflets etc etc. >> The pro brexit rallies just had people with hand printed signs or not >> signs at all. >> > > There are loads of England flags on the lampposts around here, someone > paid for them. I think something to do with Tommy Robinson. > Don't be silly. Tommy Robinson has almost no support anywhere and no one would give money to such a toxic meme. > I'm not quite clear what the political point of them is? However, they > actually look quite pretty, a pleasant change from the normal Christmas > decorations. > I would like to see the Union flag everywhere. Its very pretty and reminds us of a glorious past that is gone > -- When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it. Frédéric Bastiat
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-24 17:06 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <10dg85c$2ldt1$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #76629 |
On 10/24/25 11:51, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> There are loads of England flags on the lampposts around here, someone >> paid for them. I think something to do with Tommy Robinson. >> > Don't be silly. Tommy Robinson has almost no support anywhere and no one > would give money to such a toxic meme. > > >> I'm not quite clear what the political point of them is? However, they >> actually look quite pretty, a pleasant change from the normal >> Christmas decorations. >> > > I would like to see the Union flag everywhere. Its very pretty and > reminds us of a glorious past that is gone > >> > I'm talking about Biggin Hill, so there are also a couple of Spitfires, to remind us of our finest hour. Just did a google, no one seems to know who put them there, but most people think they look good.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-24 19:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mm20pmFtktmU10@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #76629 |
On Fri, 24 Oct 2025 11:51:03 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > Don't be silly. Tommy Robinson has almost no support anywhere and no one > would give money to such a toxic meme. https://www.dailysabah.com/opinion/op-ed/tommy-robinsons-zionist- pilgrimage Just another shabbos goy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-25 10:38 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <10di5qt$36vmo$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #76636 |
On 24/10/2025 20:02, rbowman wrote: > On Fri, 24 Oct 2025 11:51:03 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> Don't be silly. Tommy Robinson has almost no support anywhere and no one >> would give money to such a toxic meme. > > https://www.dailysabah.com/opinion/op-ed/tommy-robinsons-zionist- > pilgrimage > > Just another shabbos goy. I am really surprised that you believe a single word of that website. Tommy has never espoused any sympathy for or antipathy towards, Jews: His crusade has been entirely about the Pakistani Muslims he grew up with. When I last attended a Brexit rally in parliament square which drew tens of thousands of people and caused MPs to be so scared they all left parliament by the back door, he held a rally up the street, At best 250 people were attending. It doesn't matter what people say in the media,. He isn't a force in this country. -- Renewable energy: Expensive solutions that don't work to a problem that doesn't exist instituted by self legalising protection rackets that don't protect, masquerading as public servants who don't serve the public.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-24 18:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mm20bhFtktmU9@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #76626 |
On Fri, 24 Oct 2025 10:13:45 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > Its like her during and after Brexit, The 'we love Europe' parades had > chartered busses, pre printed T shirts and leaflets etc etc. > The pro brexit rallies just had people with hand printed signs or not > signs at all. The day before the demo there was a meeting to create signs, with suggestions and No Kings merch on offer. In case you missed the opportunity: https://store.indivisible.org/apparel/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-24 21:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <10dgpug$2rrqv$11@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #76626 |
On Fri, 24 Oct 2025 10:13:45 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > Its like her during and after Brexit, The 'we love Europe' parades had > chartered busses, pre printed T shirts and leaflets etc etc. > The pro brexit rallies just had people with hand printed signs or not > signs at all. Boris had that big purple bus with something to the effect of “£530 million a week going to Europe, that could go to the NHS” painted prominently on the side. What happened to that £530 million a week? Is the NHS benefiting from it yet?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joerg Walther <joerg.walther@magenta.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-25 10:45 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rf3pfkhol361b2vi0vop61h9rfnm5sskck@joergwalther.my-fqdn.de> |
| In reply to | #76648 |
Lawrence D´Oliveiro wrote: >Boris had that big purple bus with something to the effect of “£530 >million a week going to Europe, that could go to the NHS” painted >prominently on the side. Nigel, not Boris. >What happened to that £530 million a week? Is the NHS benefiting from it >yet? He knew he was lying when he put that on the bus. -jw- -- And now for something completely different...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-25 10:43 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <10di638$36vmo$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #76659 |
On 25/10/2025 09:45, Joerg Walther wrote: > Lawrence D´Oliveiro wrote: > >> Boris had that big purple bus with something to the effect of “£530 >> million a week going to Europe, that could go to the NHS” painted >> prominently on the side. > > Nigel, not Boris. > And it was £350m >> What happened to that £530 million a week? Is the NHS benefiting from it >> yet? > > He knew he was lying when he put that on the bus. > It got absorbed into general government corruption. And technically it wasn't a lie. We were paying that much to the EU. What we got back was politely ignored :-) > -jw- -- Labour - a bunch of rich people convincing poor people to vote for rich people by telling poor people that "other" rich people are the reason they are poor. Peter Thompson
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-23 08:54 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <10dcmvi$1eh3m$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #76547 |
On 10/22/25 21:41, rbowman wrote: > On Wed, 22 Oct 2025 14:34:43 +0100, Pancho wrote: > > >> Personally, I think they are right. I think there is something wrong >> with our current political system. Big money/lobbying has too much >> influence. Free speech is being stifled. > > I can agree with that. However the No Kings thing is also sponsored by big > money that I want no part of. Well, of course, but big money will seek to control any viable political movement. They have the Republicans and Democrats, but they will also want influence on the emergent opposition movements, and/or political figures. It is very hard to see how to tackle it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-22 18:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <U%8KQ.1143653$ctz9.724231@fx16.iad> |
| In reply to | #76475 |
On 2025-10-21, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > Vaguely related: I didn't attend but in the photos of Saturday's No Kings > demonstration I saw what I thought was a surprising amount of gray fur. I > wrote it off since this city has a lot of aging hippies. From comments > across the country it seems boomers were over represented across the > country. > > I'd have thought it was a young person thing. Probably a lot of those boomers are explaining things to the young people, many of whom get a blank look when you mention Kent State. Some of those boomers might even be able to relate their parents' stories about Germany in the 1930s. -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | Growth for the sake of \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | growth is the ideology X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | of the cancer cell. / \ if you read it the right way. | -- Edward Abbey
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web