Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #67655 > unrolled thread
| Started by | CtrlAltDel <Altie@BHam.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-05-21 20:17 +0000 |
| Last post | 2025-06-03 18:09 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 541 — 34 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc
Distros specifically designed for children CtrlAltDel <Altie@BHam.com> - 2025-05-21 20:17 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-05-21 22:42 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-05-21 13:47 -0700
Re: Distros specifically designed for children CtrlAltDel <Altie@BHam.com> - 2025-05-21 22:22 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-22 09:30 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-24 04:45 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-24 05:34 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-24 08:45 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-24 11:44 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-24 11:26 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-05-24 12:20 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-24 22:57 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-05-25 11:01 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-25 12:17 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-25 09:13 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-25 11:44 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-25 18:13 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-05-25 11:10 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-25 12:22 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-25 21:37 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-26 04:13 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-26 12:39 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-05-27 01:46 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-26 11:15 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-26 12:48 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-05-25 14:42 -0700
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-25 21:49 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-26 04:03 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-26 11:14 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-26 12:44 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-27 00:34 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-27 11:49 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-27 22:31 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-28 04:52 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-28 12:38 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-29 01:43 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-05-28 17:03 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-05-28 17:07 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-28 18:55 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-28 12:34 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-05-28 16:21 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-29 11:01 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-29 09:40 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-05-29 13:07 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-05-29 15:17 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-05-29 23:02 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-30 05:39 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-05-30 03:54 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-05-30 17:14 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-05-30 17:55 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-30 18:26 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-05-30 22:39 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-05-31 16:11 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-30 18:15 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-05-30 13:10 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-29 12:00 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-29 21:22 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-30 01:36 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-05-29 23:21 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-30 04:47 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-05-30 03:43 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-30 17:58 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-05-30 11:08 -0700
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-30 09:46 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-30 23:29 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-30 12:49 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-05-31 13:39 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-31 16:21 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-05-31 15:34 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-28 18:04 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-28 23:57 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-29 11:53 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-29 22:40 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-30 12:53 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-30 14:56 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-31 02:07 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-31 02:04 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-30 14:51 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-30 16:15 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-30 17:24 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-05-30 18:01 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-30 19:39 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-05-30 17:57 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-05-28 00:02 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-28 09:26 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-28 09:13 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-28 10:44 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-28 10:01 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-28 13:46 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-28 12:49 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-29 03:01 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-29 11:02 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-29 23:54 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-30 09:52 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-30 09:52 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-30 22:34 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Andreas Eder <a_eder_muc@web.de> - 2025-05-31 01:25 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Ian <gay@sfuu.ca> - 2025-05-30 23:37 -0700
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-31 06:51 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-31 08:31 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Ian <gay@sfuu.ca> - 2025-05-31 09:48 -0700
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-06-01 00:21 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Ian <gay@sfuu.ca> - 2025-05-31 17:47 -0700
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-01 06:03 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Ian <gay@sfuu.ca> - 2025-06-01 00:09 -0700
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-01 19:45 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Ian <gay@sfuu.ca> - 2025-06-01 13:47 -0700
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-02 02:12 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Ian <gay@sfuu.ca> - 2025-06-01 22:38 -0700
Re: Distros specifically designed for children "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-06-04 14:34 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-06-04 14:53 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-31 17:19 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-28 12:06 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-05-28 16:22 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-28 17:43 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-05-28 17:06 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-05-28 17:08 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-05-28 12:26 -0700
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-28 21:23 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-05-28 15:13 -0700
Re: Distros specifically designed for children John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-05-28 15:53 -0700
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-29 02:59 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-05-28 20:24 -0700
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-29 04:24 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-05-29 08:58 -0700
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-29 18:51 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-30 09:40 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-30 22:30 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-05-31 12:46 +1000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-05-30 23:20 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-05-31 13:49 +1000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-31 07:27 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-31 06:43 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-31 08:58 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-31 08:07 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-31 10:49 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-31 21:48 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-05-31 13:51 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-31 23:38 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-31 21:49 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-31 04:41 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-31 04:57 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-31 07:28 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-05-31 17:38 +1000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-31 08:18 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-31 17:24 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-06-01 06:07 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-31 10:51 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-05-31 13:49 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-31 07:25 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-31 06:45 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-31 09:01 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-06-03 00:17 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-31 07:24 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-29 22:43 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-05-29 17:54 -0700
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-30 01:52 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-05-29 23:47 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-30 09:53 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-05-29 23:52 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-29 02:58 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-05-28 23:45 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-05-29 18:36 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-30 01:46 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-30 09:37 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-29 11:04 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-29 09:42 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-29 12:21 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-29 22:42 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-29 18:48 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-29 21:23 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-30 01:42 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-05-29 23:09 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-30 05:18 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-05-30 03:46 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-30 18:36 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Joerg Walther <joerg.walther@magenta.de> - 2025-05-29 13:10 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-29 12:29 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-29 12:11 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-29 13:50 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-29 23:50 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-30 12:43 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-29 23:49 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-28 18:11 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-28 19:18 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-28 23:40 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-29 02:55 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-05-28 23:47 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-29 05:48 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-05-29 02:04 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-29 18:30 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-30 09:36 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-29 11:06 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-29 09:42 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-29 12:22 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-29 19:13 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-29 21:24 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-30 01:48 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-30 09:55 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-30 09:45 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-30 13:24 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-30 14:42 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-30 16:08 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-30 18:08 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-30 19:42 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-30 22:25 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-31 07:29 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-31 06:49 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-31 09:04 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-31 08:27 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-31 10:59 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-31 12:43 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-31 12:07 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-05-31 14:03 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-31 23:44 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-06-01 10:49 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-06-01 13:58 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-01 19:52 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-01 22:46 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-06-02 05:23 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-02 08:37 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-06-02 07:47 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-06-02 09:02 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-06-02 10:51 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-02 12:57 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-06-02 14:58 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-06-02 15:38 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-06-02 14:59 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-06-03 07:17 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-06-03 11:58 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-06-06 18:33 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-06-07 02:22 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-06-08 03:39 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-06-02 09:58 -0700
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-06-02 18:05 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-06-02 09:06 -0700
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-06-03 07:22 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-30 18:05 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-30 14:40 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-30 22:23 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-29 19:11 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-29 12:07 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-29 13:47 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-05-30 08:41 +1000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-30 08:32 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com> - 2025-05-30 11:59 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-30 12:21 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-30 18:44 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-30 12:46 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-05-31 12:27 +1000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-31 02:42 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-05-31 13:39 +1000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-31 04:49 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-05-31 17:56 +1000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-31 08:25 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-31 11:02 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-06-02 09:13 -0700
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-06-03 00:24 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-06-03 07:24 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-03 09:21 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-06-03 11:01 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-03 10:26 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-06-03 12:35 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-03 12:37 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-06-03 18:32 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-04 04:23 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-04 12:01 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-06-04 00:19 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-06-04 00:18 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-06-03 22:01 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-06-03 12:05 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-06-03 17:00 +0200
GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces (was: Re: Distros specifically designed for children) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-03 10:36 +0100
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-03 11:32 +0100
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-03 19:24 +0000
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-04 11:54 +0100
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces (was: Re: Distros specifically designed for children) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-06-03 08:42 -0700
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-03 17:37 +0100
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces (was: Re: Distros specifically designed for children) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-06-04 00:15 +0000
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-06-04 06:50 -0400
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-04 13:02 +0100
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-06-04 23:12 +0000
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-06-07 16:00 +0000
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces (was: Re: Distros specifically designed for children) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-06-04 08:48 -0700
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces (was: Re: Distros specifically designed for children) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-06-04 23:14 +0000
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces (was: Re: Distros specifically designed for children) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-06-05 08:45 -0700
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces (was: Re: Distros specifically designed for children) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-06-05 23:42 +0000
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces (was: Re: Distros specifically designed for children) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-06-06 08:32 -0700
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces (was: Re: Distros specifically designed for children) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-06-06 08:37 -0700
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces (was: Re: Distros specifically designed for children) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-06-07 02:19 +0000
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-06-07 07:05 -0400
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-06-08 03:46 +0000
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-06-08 00:25 -0400
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-06-08 08:25 -0400
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-08 18:25 +0000
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-06-09 08:47 -0400
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-06-08 23:05 +0000
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces (was: Re: Distros specifically designed for children) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-06-09 15:34 -0700
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces (was: Re: Distros specifically designed for children) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-06-10 01:10 +0000
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces (was: Re: Distros specifically designed for children) Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-06-10 07:44 +0200
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-06-10 14:14 +0000
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-06-10 09:16 -0700
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-06-10 23:45 +0000
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces (was: Re: Distros specifically designed for children) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-06-06 21:02 +0000
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-06-06 15:03 +0000
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces (was: Re: Distros specifically designed for children) c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-06-06 00:09 -0400
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-05 10:46 +0100
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-06-05 08:54 -0700
Re: GIMP and Photoshop user interfaces Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-06-05 23:46 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-29 19:02 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-28 23:11 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-29 12:06 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-05-29 09:55 -0700
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-29 23:53 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-05-29 15:39 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-29 23:51 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-05-29 23:07 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-05-28 23:23 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-05-29 09:51 -0700
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-29 23:58 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-05-30 11:20 -0700
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-30 22:19 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-28 09:09 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-28 12:03 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-28 23:14 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-05-26 01:10 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-05-31 13:33 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-31 18:37 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-05-31 18:49 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-26 11:11 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-26 12:42 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-05-26 18:11 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-26 20:47 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-05-27 03:10 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-05-27 02:05 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-27 11:39 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-27 12:45 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-28 12:46 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-05-27 23:48 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-28 05:04 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-05-28 02:33 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-28 09:07 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-28 12:49 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-27 00:39 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-27 11:37 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-27 22:28 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-05-27 17:08 -0700
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-28 01:28 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-05-28 00:08 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-28 04:59 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-05-28 02:37 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-28 11:56 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-28 14:47 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-28 23:05 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-29 12:21 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-29 13:53 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-05-29 18:20 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-29 18:54 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-05-29 09:35 -0700
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-30 12:38 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-05-30 18:06 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-31 09:25 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-29 22:34 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-05-27 23:42 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-28 09:03 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-05-28 23:38 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-05-31 13:38 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-28 11:51 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-28 23:06 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-29 12:29 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-29 13:57 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-05-29 18:23 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-29 18:51 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-05-29 09:37 -0700
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-30 12:33 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-30 16:12 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-30 23:07 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-31 00:41 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-31 03:17 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-30 22:15 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-30 22:56 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-30 23:27 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-31 09:27 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-31 11:07 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-31 17:27 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-31 22:21 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-31 23:04 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-05-31 19:06 -0700
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-06-01 01:33 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-06-02 11:35 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-02 13:03 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-02 17:04 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-02 22:48 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-06-02 10:08 -0700
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-02 22:50 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-06-03 07:26 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-03 09:45 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-06-03 11:02 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-03 10:47 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-03 00:05 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-06-03 02:08 +0000
OT: [I'm not even sure what to write here] (was: Re: Distros specifically designed for children) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-03 10:40 +0100
Re: OT: [I'm not even sure what to write here] The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-03 11:45 +0100
Re: OT: [I'm not even sure what to write here] Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-06-03 13:07 +0000
Re: OT: [I'm not even sure what to write here] (was: Re: Distros specifically designed for children) Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-06-03 12:58 +0000
Re: OT: [I'm not even sure what to write here] Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-03 15:02 +0100
Re: OT: [I'm not even sure what to write here] rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-03 19:16 +0000
Re: OT: [I'm not even sure what to write here] Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-06-04 10:13 +0000
Re: OT: [I'm not even sure what to write here] (was: Re: Distros specifically designed for children) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-03 18:46 +0000
Re: OT: [I'm not even sure what to write here] Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-04 00:41 +0100
Re: OT: [I'm not even sure what to write here] rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-04 05:04 +0000
Re: OT: [I'm not even sure what to write here] The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-04 11:52 +0100
Re: OT: [I'm not even sure what to write here] rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-04 20:06 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Popping Mad <rainbow@colition.gov> - 2025-06-03 12:23 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-03 08:11 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-06-03 02:03 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-03 06:14 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-03 09:02 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-03 17:49 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-03 19:20 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-04 04:10 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-04 11:56 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-04 18:26 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-04 20:36 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-06-04 19:10 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-05 09:41 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-06-07 01:36 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-06-08 17:41 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-08 18:22 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-08 21:27 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-08 21:26 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-06-04 01:28 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-04 12:13 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-04 19:10 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-03 09:01 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-06-03 13:24 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-03 15:37 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-06-04 10:35 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-06-04 01:26 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-06-04 06:13 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-04 12:13 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-06-04 20:50 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-06-06 18:35 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-07 01:06 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-06-07 01:05 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children CtrlAltDel <Altie@BHam.com> - 2025-06-02 07:20 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-02 08:41 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children CtrlAltDel <Altie@BHam.com> - 2025-06-02 08:15 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-02 10:17 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children CtrlAltDel <Altie@BHam.com> - 2025-06-02 09:57 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-02 12:56 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children CtrlAltDel <Altie@BHam.com> - 2025-06-03 00:08 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-02 17:44 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-02 22:51 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-03 00:11 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-03 08:12 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-06-04 01:17 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-04 12:06 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-06-03 01:56 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-03 08:22 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-03 17:58 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-03 19:22 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-06-03 18:32 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-04 04:48 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-04 11:49 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-04 19:28 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-06-04 01:22 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-04 12:11 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-31 23:09 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-06-02 11:30 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-02 13:02 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-06-03 01:51 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-06-03 04:12 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-06-03 13:26 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-03 15:51 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-06-03 15:50 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-06-04 00:09 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-06-03 21:57 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-04 04:16 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-06-04 10:29 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-06-04 06:45 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-04 12:48 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-06-04 22:56 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-04 19:32 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-06-04 10:25 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-04 12:19 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-06-04 15:08 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-04 16:40 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-04 18:43 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-06-04 23:01 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-06-04 18:39 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-06-03 00:26 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-06-03 01:47 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-06-04 00:11 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-06-02 21:24 -0700
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-06-03 00:54 -0400
OT: fascism, far-right (was: Re: Distros specifically designed for children) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-03 10:46 +0100
Re: OT: fascism, far-right Popping Mad <rainbow@colition.gov> - 2025-06-03 12:20 -0400
Re: OT: fascism, far-right Allodoxaphobia <trepidation@example.net> - 2025-06-04 13:37 +0000
Re: OT: fascism, far-right The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-06-04 15:13 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children CtrlAltDel <Altie@BHam.com> - 2025-05-31 00:35 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-31 03:22 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-07-27 15:24 -0700
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-28 13:08 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-07-28 21:46 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-07-28 14:52 -0700
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-07-28 22:04 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-07-29 06:20 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-28 23:19 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-07-29 06:14 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-07-29 11:36 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-29 18:35 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-29 22:29 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children CtrlAltDel <Altie@BHam.com> - 2025-05-31 22:16 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-31 23:30 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children CtrlAltDel <Altie@BHam.com> - 2025-05-31 22:58 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-06-01 01:32 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-05-21 18:29 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children CtrlAltDel <Altie@BHam.com> - 2025-05-21 23:22 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2025-05-21 23:51 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-22 01:05 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-22 09:34 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-22 09:32 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-22 00:01 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-22 16:03 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children CtrlAltDel <Altie@BHam.com> - 2025-05-22 20:14 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-22 22:27 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-05-22 23:26 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-05-23 06:41 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-23 08:48 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Harold Stevens <wookie@aspen.localdomain> - 2025-05-23 04:03 -0500
Re: Distros specifically designed for children The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-23 09:17 +0100
Re: Distros specifically designed for children CtrlAltDel <Altie@BHam.com> - 2025-05-23 23:42 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jaworski1978@adres.pl> - 2025-05-24 07:39 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jaworski1978@adres.pl> - 2025-05-24 10:27 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-24 08:55 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2025-05-22 21:04 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2025-05-24 13:47 +0000
Re: Distros specifically designed for children jayjwa <jayjwa@atr2.ath.cx.invalid> - 2025-05-25 12:45 -0400
Re: Distros specifically designed for children 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jaworski1978@adres.pl> - 2025-06-03 18:00 +0200
Re: Distros specifically designed for children 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jaworski1978@adres.pl> - 2025-06-03 18:09 +0200
Page 22 of 28 — ← Prev page 1 … 20 21 [22] 23 24 … 28 Next page →
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-04 04:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ma9vajFgg9qU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #68270 |
On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 19:20:43 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 03/06/2025 18:49, rbowman wrote: >> On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 09:02:30 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> >>> On 03/06/2025 07:14, rbowman wrote: >>>> On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 02:03:06 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man wrote: >>>> >>>>> Allowing free movement of former subjects will turn out to be a >>>>> deadly mistake. >>>> >>>> For the Windrush generation it was beyond allowing. 'Please, please >>>> come from Jamaica and help rebuild Britain after we lost the war we >>>> thought we won.' >>> Why do you hate Britain so much? >> >> Why do you hate the US so much? > > I don't. I just find it amusing, blissfully ignorant and occasionally > dangerous > > You *want* Britrain to fail. Not necessarily. I do find it amusing as it flails around although it does get a bit dangerous as it props up Zelensky. If rumors can be believed the situation may have been resolved had Johnson stayed out of it and now Starmer is jumping in with 'full backing'. Zelensky should contemplate what Britain's full backing did for Poland in '39. > I really want the USA to succeed. In spite of its politicians, and its > ignorant population It's rather hard to succeed with an ignorant population. You see, your critique of the US politicians and ignorant population triggers me to strike back at your British chauvinism.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-04 11:56 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <101p8ou$ojp1$16@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #68286 |
On 04/06/2025 05:10, rbowman wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 19:20:43 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> On 03/06/2025 18:49, rbowman wrote: >>> On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 09:02:30 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> >>>> On 03/06/2025 07:14, rbowman wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 02:03:06 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Allowing free movement of former subjects will turn out to be a >>>>>> deadly mistake. >>>>> >>>>> For the Windrush generation it was beyond allowing. 'Please, please >>>>> come from Jamaica and help rebuild Britain after we lost the war we >>>>> thought we won.' >>>> Why do you hate Britain so much? >>> >>> Why do you hate the US so much? >> >> I don't. I just find it amusing, blissfully ignorant and occasionally >> dangerous >> >> You *want* Britrain to fail. > > Not necessarily. I do find it amusing as it flails around although it does > get a bit dangerous as it props up Zelensky. If rumors can be believed > the situation may have been resolved had Johnson stayed out of it and now > Starmer is jumping in with 'full backing'. Zelensky should contemplate > what Britain's full backing did for Poland in '39. > Oh dear. You really believe that, dont you? Even king Donald is supporting Zelenskyy now... sinbe Putin pissed on his trainers >> I really want the USA to succeed. In spite of its politicians, and its >> ignorant population > > It's rather hard to succeed with an ignorant population. You see, your > critique of the US politicians and ignorant population triggers me to > strike back at your British chauvinism. > Well yes, I agree. But ignorance is curable with experience. Downright stupidity is not. So there is hope for most of the USA, eventually. > -- Microsoft : the best reason to go to Linux that ever existed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-04 18:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mabhedF2eclU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #68320 |
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 11:56:30 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > Well yes, I agree. But ignorance is curable with experience. Downright > stupidity is not. > So there is hope for most of the USA, eventually. I despaired of that long ago. Same lies spoken by a revolving cast of actors and the people believe it will be different 'this time'. https://www.goodreads.com/work/quotes/15750971-the-most-dangerous- superstition Rose addresses the root problem. I can't say he sums it up since 'The Most Dangerous Superstition' since he beats the dead horse at length. It appears Musk had the same delusion although it may only be sour grapes. The big beautiful bill doesn't extend EV credits and doesn't use StarLink for air traffic control.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-04 20:36 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <101q77s$10u8n$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #68339 |
On 04/06/2025 19:26, rbowman wrote: > On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 11:56:30 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> Well yes, I agree. But ignorance is curable with experience. Downright >> stupidity is not. >> So there is hope for most of the USA, eventually. > > I despaired of that long ago. Same lies spoken by a revolving cast of > actors and the people believe it will be different 'this time'. > > https://www.goodreads.com/work/quotes/15750971-the-most-dangerous- > superstition > > Rose addresses the root problem. I can't say he sums it up since 'The Most > Dangerous Superstition' since he beats the dead horse at length. > > It appears Musk had the same delusion although it may only be sour grapes. > The big beautiful bill doesn't extend EV credits and doesn't use StarLink > for air traffic control. > My take is that even with the best intentions, which is debatable, the problems that were so clearly expressed in the run up to the elections are not that easy to fix. Not at all. Like Climate, the economy is a very complex interconnected brute that defies modelling, and you tamper at your peril. -- Renewable energy: Expensive solutions that don't work to a problem that doesn't exist instituted by self legalising protection rackets that don't protect, masquerading as public servants who don't serve the public.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-04 19:10 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <_judnU79FIbFT931nZ2dnZfqnPhg4p2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #68345 |
On 6/4/25 3:36 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 04/06/2025 19:26, rbowman wrote: >> On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 11:56:30 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> >>> Well yes, I agree. But ignorance is curable with experience. Downright >>> stupidity is not. >>> So there is hope for most of the USA, eventually. >> >> I despaired of that long ago. Same lies spoken by a revolving cast of >> actors and the people believe it will be different 'this time'. >> >> https://www.goodreads.com/work/quotes/15750971-the-most-dangerous- >> superstition >> >> Rose addresses the root problem. I can't say he sums it up since 'The >> Most >> Dangerous Superstition' since he beats the dead horse at length. >> >> It appears Musk had the same delusion although it may only be sour >> grapes. >> The big beautiful bill doesn't extend EV credits and doesn't use StarLink >> for air traffic control. >> > My take is that even with the best intentions, which is debatable, the > problems that were so clearly expressed in the run up to the elections > are not that easy to fix. Not at all. > Like Climate, the economy is a very complex interconnected brute that > defies modelling, and you tamper at your peril. By far, MOST people never got much of a sci-tech education. This includes politicians. They JUST DON'T KNOW ... and then can't understand why the damned nerds say they can't get there from here.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-05 09:41 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <101rl74$1efqc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #68361 |
On 05/06/2025 00:10, c186282 wrote: > By far, MOST people never got much of a sci-tech education. > This includes politicians. They JUST DON'T KNOW ... and then > can't understand why the damned nerds say they can't get > there from here. I heard tell that when the Liberal Democrat Chris Huhne arrived as a minster in the Tory/Liberal coalition he waltzed into his ministry and was given the run down on 'renewable' energy by the chief scientific officer David Mackay, showing how basically impossible his plans were. He flounced out and was not seen again for a fortnight. -- Gun Control: The law that ensures that only criminals have guns.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-07 01:36 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <jYicncez5c59Ut71nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #68372 |
On 6/5/25 4:41 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 05/06/2025 00:10, c186282 wrote: >> By far, MOST people never got much of a sci-tech education. >> This includes politicians. They JUST DON'T KNOW ... and then >> can't understand why the damned nerds say they can't get >> there from here. > > I heard tell that when the Liberal Democrat Chris Huhne arrived as a > minster in the Tory/Liberal coalition he waltzed into his ministry and > was given the run down on 'renewable' energy by the chief scientific > officer David Mackay, showing how basically impossible his plans were. > > He flounced out and was not seen again for a fortnight. Heh heh ! I can kind of believe that ! :-) Pols, and MOST constituents, like to believe in "magic". They DON'T KNOW why it can't work. Anyone who explains it to them becomes an ENEMY. UK ... not too long ago there was a big initiative to replace all gas-powered heating/stoves with ELECTRIC. THEN somebody FINALLY managed to explain that it would require a TOTAL, MAJOR, re-do of the entire national grid to cope with the load. Suddenly the initiative, well along, kind of just disappeared ........ :-) Nothing WRONG with electric ... but EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE has to be UP to the challenge. Frankly I do NOT want gas heating/appliances because there are TOO many horrific tales of leaks and huge EXPLOSIONS. However, in USA, The Grid IS up to it. UK/EU ... not so much. The sheer EXPENSE of a national upgrade !!! Queen Greta Greenie ... DON'T be eager to kiss her tiny ass ..........
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-08 17:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <rXj1Q.1029331$%pKb.390318@fx14.iad> |
| In reply to | #68488 |
On 2025-06-07, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote: > UK ... not too long ago there was a big initiative > to replace all gas-powered heating/stoves with > ELECTRIC. Here in British Columbia there's a movement afoot to ban the inclusion of gas in all new construction. It's getting pushback, though. > THEN somebody FINALLY managed to explain > that it would require a TOTAL, MAJOR, re-do of > the entire national grid to cope with the load. > > Suddenly the initiative, well along, kind of > just disappeared ........ :-) Local pols are still dreaming. Why let the peons have cheap local gas when it can be liquefied and sold overseas? > Nothing WRONG with electric ... but EXISTING > INFRASTRUCTURE has to be UP to the challenge. > Frankly I do NOT want gas heating/appliances > because there are TOO many horrific tales of > leaks and huge EXPLOSIONS. However, in USA, > The Grid IS up to it. UK/EU ... not so much. > The sheer EXPENSE of a national upgrade !!! B.C. has always been proud of its abundant hydro power. But 40- to 60-storey apartment towers are springing up like weeds - and I've heard that each one needs its own substation to power it. Using electric baseboard heaters and heat pumps in place of gas will make it worse. And then there's the push to electric cars, with their charging requirements. Despite our many hydro plants, we're turning into a net importer of electricity. Throw in a few LNG plants and bitcoin factories, and it's just a matter of time before the brownouts start... -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | Growth for the sake of \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | growth is the ideology X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | of the cancer cell. / \ if you read it the right way. | -- Edward Abbey
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-08 18:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mam2o2Frj32U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #68546 |
On Sun, 08 Jun 2025 17:41:43 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > Local pols are still dreaming. Why let the peons have cheap local gas > when it can be liquefied and sold overseas? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Merchant_Marine_Act_of_1920#Importation_of_liquefied_natural_gas The whole article is worth reading. Since there are no LNG tankers that meet the requirements of the Jones Act, you cannot ship LNG from Brownsville TX to Gloucester MA. Since LNG is fungible that led to the embarrassing import of LNG that could be traced back to Russia. That's led to the US pressuring Germany into building LNG ports and buying US LNG. What role the US had in blowing up Nord Stream 2 can be debated. Because of local opposition and environmental challenges it's almost impossible to build a gas pipeline from an area like West Virginia where natural gas is so plentiful it's given away in some cases to New England.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-08 21:27 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1024ro0$1r42$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #68547 |
On 08/06/2025 19:22, rbowman wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Jun 2025 17:41:43 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>
>> Local pols are still dreaming. Why let the peons have cheap local gas
>> when it can be liquefied and sold overseas?
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
> Merchant_Marine_Act_of_1920#Importation_of_liquefied_natural_gas
>
> The whole article is worth reading. Since there are no LNG tankers that
> meet the requirements of the Jones Act, you cannot ship LNG from
> Brownsville TX to Gloucester MA. Since LNG is fungible that led to the
> embarrassing import of LNG that could be traced back to Russia.
>
> That's led to the US pressuring Germany into building LNG ports and buying
> US LNG. What role the US had in blowing up Nord Stream 2 can be debated.
>
It wasnt in use anyway.
> Because of local opposition and environmental challenges it's almost
> impossible to build a gas pipeline from an area like West Virginia where
> natural gas is so plentiful it's given away in some cases to New England.
>
Logic is not a subject that is taught in the USA
--
“I know that most men, including those at ease with problems of the
greatest complexity, can seldom accept even the simplest and most
obvious truth if it be such as would oblige them to admit the falsity of
conclusions which they have delighted in explaining to colleagues, which
they have proudly taught to others, and which they have woven, thread by
thread, into the fabric of their lives.”
― Leo Tolstoy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-08 21:26 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1024rl2$1r42$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #68546 |
On 08/06/2025 18:41, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> B.C. has always been proud of its abundant hydro power.
> But 40- to 60-storey apartment towers are springing up
> like weeds - and I've heard that each one needs its own
> substation to power it. Using electric baseboard heaters
> and heat pumps in place of gas will make it worse. And
> then there's the push to electric cars, with their charging
> requirements. Despite our many hydro plants, we're turning
> into a net importer of electricity. Throw in a few LNG
> plants and bitcoin factories, and it's just a matter of
> time before the brownouts start...
Solar farms don't do well in a winter night when the electricity is needed.
Build some nukes
--
“I know that most men, including those at ease with problems of the
greatest complexity, can seldom accept even the simplest and most
obvious truth if it be such as would oblige them to admit the falsity of
conclusions which they have delighted in explaining to colleagues, which
they have proudly taught to others, and which they have woven, thread by
thread, into the fabric of their lives.”
― Leo Tolstoy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-04 01:28 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <wxadndQfm7YdRKL1nZ2dnZfqn_EAAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #68220 |
On 6/3/25 4:02 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 03/06/2025 07:14, rbowman wrote: >> On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 02:03:06 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man wrote: >> >>> Allowing free movement of former subjects will turn out to be a deadly >>> mistake. >> >> For the Windrush generation it was beyond allowing. 'Please, please come >> from Jamaica and help rebuild Britain after we lost the war we thought we >> won.' > Why do you hate Britain so much? Is it "hate" - or "pity" ??? The UK destroyed itself. Madness, idiocy, but that's how it is. It'll be pure Clockwork Orange for a long time now.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-04 12:13 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <101p9p3$ojp1$21@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #68298 |
On 04/06/2025 06:28, c186282 wrote: > On 6/3/25 4:02 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 03/06/2025 07:14, rbowman wrote: >>> On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 02:03:06 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man wrote: >>> >>>> Allowing free movement of former subjects will turn out to be a deadly >>>> mistake. >>> >>> For the Windrush generation it was beyond allowing. 'Please, please come >>> from Jamaica and help rebuild Britain after we lost the war we >>> thought we >>> won.' >> Why do you hate Britain so much? > > Is it "hate" - or "pity" ??? > > The UK destroyed itself. Madness, idiocy, but > that's how it is. > > It'll be pure Clockwork Orange for a long time now. Hmm. Wait and see. -- "What do you think about Gay Marriage?" "I don't." "Don't what?" "Think about Gay Marriage."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-04 19:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mabk1vF2eclU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #68298 |
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 01:28:37 -0400, c186282 wrote: > It'll be pure Clockwork Orange for a long time now. In the mid-'60s the media had burned out the Beat Generation and the Hippies hadn't arrived so they turned to motorcycle gangs for the covers of Life and other mags. I bought a cheap paperback because the cover art had bikers. I was carrying it around to read between classes when the English professor saw it and praised my taste in literature. I played it cool and didn't let on I was puzzled by the complete lack of motorcycles that had been on the cover and the weird Russian slang the characters used. Of course I didn't have a clue who Burgess was.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-03 09:01 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <101ma5k$3sucd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #68196 |
On 03/06/2025 03:03, Borax Man wrote: > On 2025-06-02, Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> wrote: >> >> >> On 6/2/25 04:35, Borax Man wrote: >>> On 2025-05-31, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>> On 31/05/2025 18:27, rbowman wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 31 May 2025 11:07:00 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Britain had an Empire once that dealt with all sorts of people. We >>>>>> aren't as insular as Americans. >>>>> >>>>> Then the chickens came home to roost... >> >> By which you mean that the former subjects of the Empire were free >> to come to the UK if they knew their place and many of their children >> are now participating in the governance of the UK and Commonweath. >> Or am I wrong about that? >> > > Now you are being colonised by the former subjects. Truly colonised in > an irreversible way. India was able to get rid of you. > > The UK didn't replace Indian cities with Brits, but India will replace > you. > Not really, India is OK. Indians are very British really. Its the Islamic invasion that is rather more worrying. > Allowing free movement of former subjects will turn out to be a deadly > mistake. > It isn't free, its just a bit less restricted,. > A people who decide to no longer exist or maintain their nation are just > weak and not worthy of respect. > It isn't the people who decide. It was a cabal of 'elites' lead by the EU. > Brexit won probably because of misguided notions of "sovreignty". The > Brexiteers convinced the population that they could be free of foriegn > influence, but those who votes didn't realise that they were an occupied > country anyway. Well that is quite close to the truth. The EU was a restrictive tariff erecting parochial organisation that sought to make a new USSR based in Brussels. A United States of Europe. Without democracy. A one party state. Of unsackable bureaucrats Speaking 20 different languages with 20 different cultures each with its own history. With its industries protected from foreign competition and all set to be a cosy insular little place just like the USA now seems to want to be. A 4th Reich modelled on what Hitler failed to do. Britain however is a global nation and has been for 500 years. It simply didn't fit. Many people voted for Brexit for the same reason they voted for King Donald. To get rid of a cosy elite who were fucking things up. Except that that elite managed to make Brexit a meaningless piece of paper. by signing 'big bootiful deals' with the EU that left us more or less precisely where we were. But the times they are a changing - the man and the mood that led us to Brexit is now a political party that is ahead in the polls. The people of Britain haven't given up the struggle. All across the world the dynamic is changing - the politics and economics of post war prosperity are pretty much dead. And even King Donald won't bring them back again. People are turning away from the current elites and looking for fresh ideas. Russia is bust and collapsing and so allegedly is China. In Europe people are sick of the socialists and their mealy mouthed morality, and complete lack of competence. All we know is that whatever we have, Russia is way worse. Ergo we have to help put the bastards back in their place. If you really want to find out what is happening outside your little cabbage patch, your simplistic ideas that you have been told about Britain, the EU, Europe, Russia and Brexit have to go. Its not that simple. Any more than king Donald is there because at least half America was fucking stupid enough to believe he could do what he promised. And wasn't stupid himself. Everyone realises the old ways don't work any longer. That's the intelligence of democracies, They may not know what to do but they are fully capable of shaking things up till someone comes along who does. I understand that, but I also understand that placing faith in a fallible human just because he or she inst the one that sat on the throne last time, is no guaranteed solution either. And believing in tin pot would be dictators who want to stir up hatred for other nations because they are fresh out of ideas and need someone else to blame, is a very dangerous religion indeed. The USA has never been invaded since the Pilgrim Fathers by a hostile genocidal nation. Apart from IIRC Pearl Harbour its never had the shit bombed out of it by people who basically want to destroy it. It copped out of Korea, It chickened out of Vietnam, and it abandoned Afghanistan and Iraq. It simply doesn't like fighting wars and it isn't very good at it. The hardware is OK but by and large the people in the military don't like fighting. Which is a very difficult art to master. Fine. No one likes fighting wars except tin pot dictators. But at least when you need to fight, you ought to learn to be good at it. You simply do not understand that Europe has been at war since Hom. Sap, moved out of hunter gathering and started to develop herding. All the USA did was grab a shitload of land steeped with natural resources by murdering a few Indians who it used to belong to. So your politics reflects that. That's fine, but please do not use that worldview to judge the rest of the world. It is a mistake. -- I was brought up to believe that you should never give offence if you can avoid it; the new culture tells us you should always take offence if you can. There are now experts in the art of taking offence, indeed whole academic subjects, such as 'gender studies', devoted to it. Sir Roger Scruton
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-03 13:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrn103tts8.9pa.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> |
| In reply to | #68219 |
On 2025-06-03, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On 03/06/2025 03:03, Borax Man wrote: >> On 2025-06-02, Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 6/2/25 04:35, Borax Man wrote: >>>> On 2025-05-31, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>> On 31/05/2025 18:27, rbowman wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 31 May 2025 11:07:00 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Britain had an Empire once that dealt with all sorts of people. We >>>>>>> aren't as insular as Americans. >>>>>> >>>>>> Then the chickens came home to roost... >>> >>> By which you mean that the former subjects of the Empire were free >>> to come to the UK if they knew their place and many of their children >>> are now participating in the governance of the UK and Commonweath. >>> Or am I wrong about that? >>> >> >> Now you are being colonised by the former subjects. Truly colonised in >> an irreversible way. India was able to get rid of you. >> >> The UK didn't replace Indian cities with Brits, but India will replace >> you. >> > Not really, India is OK. Indians are very British really. > > Its the Islamic invasion that is rather more worrying. > > Indians are Indians. They may adopt some customs, but that doesn't change what you are. >> Allowing free movement of former subjects will turn out to be a deadly >> mistake. >> > > It isn't free, its just a bit less restricted,. > > >> A people who decide to no longer exist or maintain their nation are just >> weak and not worthy of respect. >> > > It isn't the people who decide. It was a cabal of 'elites' lead by the EU. > > >> Brexit won probably because of misguided notions of "sovreignty". The >> Brexiteers convinced the population that they could be free of foriegn >> influence, but those who votes didn't realise that they were an occupied >> country anyway. > > Well that is quite close to the truth. The EU was a restrictive tariff > erecting parochial organisation that sought to make a new USSR based in > Brussels. A United States of Europe. Without democracy. A one party > state. Of unsackable bureaucrats > > Speaking 20 different languages with 20 different cultures each with its > own history. > > With its industries protected from foreign competition and all set to be > a cosy insular little place just like the USA now seems to want to be. > > A 4th Reich modelled on what Hitler failed to do. > > Britain however is a global nation and has been for 500 years. It simply > didn't fit. > > Many people voted for Brexit for the same reason they voted for King > Donald. To get rid of a cosy elite who were fucking things up. > > Except that that elite managed to make Brexit a meaningless piece of > paper. by signing 'big bootiful deals' with the EU that left us more or > less precisely where we were. > But the times they are a changing - the man and the mood that led us to > Brexit is now a political party that is ahead in the polls. > > The people of Britain haven't given up the struggle. > > All across the world the dynamic is changing - the politics and > economics of post war prosperity are pretty much dead. And even King > Donald won't bring them back again. > > People are turning away from the current elites and looking for fresh > ideas. Russia is bust and collapsing and so allegedly is China. In > Europe people are sick of the socialists and their mealy mouthed > morality, and complete lack of competence. > > All we know is that whatever we have, Russia is way worse. Ergo we have > to help put the bastards back in their place. > > If you really want to find out what is happening outside your little > cabbage patch, your simplistic ideas that you have been told about > Britain, the EU, Europe, Russia and Brexit have to go. > > Its not that simple. > > Any more than king Donald is there because at least half America was > fucking stupid enough to believe he could do what he promised. And > wasn't stupid himself. > > Everyone realises the old ways don't work any longer. That's the > intelligence of democracies, They may not know what to do but they are > fully capable of shaking things up till someone comes along who does. > > I understand that, but I also understand that placing faith in a > fallible human just because he or she inst the one that sat on the > throne last time, is no guaranteed solution either. > > And believing in tin pot would be dictators who want to stir up hatred > for other nations because they are fresh out of ideas and need someone > else to blame, is a very dangerous religion indeed. > > The USA has never been invaded since the Pilgrim Fathers by a hostile > genocidal nation. Apart from IIRC Pearl Harbour its never had the shit > bombed out of it by people who basically want to destroy it. It copped > out of Korea, It chickened out of Vietnam, and it abandoned Afghanistan > and Iraq. > > It simply doesn't like fighting wars and it isn't very good at it. The > hardware is OK but by and large the people in the military don't like > fighting. Which is a very difficult art to master. > > Fine. No one likes fighting wars except tin pot dictators. But at least > when you need to fight, you ought to learn to be good at it. > > You simply do not understand that Europe has been at war since Hom. Sap, > moved out of hunter gathering and started to develop herding. > > All the USA did was grab a shitload of land steeped with natural > resources by murdering a few Indians who it used to belong to. > > So your politics reflects that. That's fine, but please do not use that > worldview to judge the rest of the world. > > It is a mistake. > The reason that the Post WWII order is dead evades a lot of people. It is dead because the order could never have worked. It was doomed from the start. Its ideals, of open borders, of open societies, were folly from the start. Its economics flawed, its whole ideological basis was unsustainable. This has nothing to do with Donald or Populists or Brexit, they are reacting to what the Liberal Order created, a failure. An invetiable failure. Blaming them is like blaming the maid for cleaning, because you made a mess of the place. We are seeing now the cope, the denial and the desperate attempts to keep it going. If only we could stop people thinking this and that. I've heard about Russia and China collapsing for years now. China was supposed to collapse 10 times over by now. Again, seething and cope from a decrepit system. All lies...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-03 15:37 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <101n1aj$20jc$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #68247 |
On 03/06/2025 14:24, Borax Man wrote: > Indians are Indians. They may adopt some customs, but that doesn't > change what you are. I think actually it does. In that customs and culture are what define almost exclusively how a person behaves in a social context. My local NHS hospitals are probably majority staffed by Indians, with a few SE Asians and Africans thrown in, and by that I mean first generation people who were not born here. They are with one or two exceptions, bloody excellent and very 'British'. The only think 'Indian' I have noticed is that the 'Indian' female doctors are extremely compassionate and conscientious. And dexterous. My last heart operation done under local anaesthetic was done by a little Indian lady surgeon with deft fingers and an absolute feel for not causing pain. Every time she was about to do something painful 'another 50 mg of fentanyl please' . The radiologist was a black guy from Zimbabwe and the backup nurse in charge of making sure I didn't die was an Australian. Best heart team ever. I walked out the next day and drove home. No. By and large Britain exists as much because of colonial immigration as in spite of it. There are only one or two cultures that hate Britain but still want to live here. Albanians are pure criminal thugs. There are some ex European communists who ended up here and hate Britain. Marx was the first of course. Red Ed Milliband, minister for energy and climate change is another. And of course their are are chums from the Religion of Peace whose prime directive is to slay unbelievers. Not good really. Only fit in well with the communists -- Climate is what you expect but weather is what you get. Mark Twain
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-04 10:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrn10408bo.i95.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> |
| In reply to | #68252 |
On 2025-06-03, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On 03/06/2025 14:24, Borax Man wrote: >> Indians are Indians. They may adopt some customs, but that doesn't >> change what you are. > > I think actually it does. > In that customs and culture are what define almost exclusively how a > person behaves in a social context. > > My local NHS hospitals are probably majority staffed by Indians, with a > few SE Asians and Africans thrown in, and by that I mean first > generation people who were not born here. > > They are with one or two exceptions, bloody excellent and very 'British'. > > The only think 'Indian' I have noticed is that the 'Indian' female > doctors are extremely compassionate and conscientious. And dexterous. > My last heart operation done under local anaesthetic was done by a > little Indian lady surgeon with deft fingers and an absolute feel for > not causing pain. Every time she was about to do something painful > 'another 50 mg of fentanyl please' . > > The radiologist was a black guy from Zimbabwe and the backup nurse in > charge of making sure I didn't die was an Australian. Best heart team > ever. I walked out the next day and drove home. > > No. By and large Britain exists as much because of colonial immigration > as in spite of it. > There are only one or two cultures that hate Britain but still want to > live here. > > Albanians are pure criminal thugs. > > There are some ex European communists who ended up here and hate > Britain. Marx was the first of course. Red Ed Milliband, minister for > energy and climate change is another. > > And of course their are are chums from the Religion of Peace whose prime > directive is to slay unbelievers. Not good really. Only fit in well with > the communists > It's an amazing world now, where you can literally say that eradicating an ethnicity through mass immigration and assimilation is not only OK, but the moral thing to do. That you can advocate it, and have the system on your side when you attack and vilify those who object.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-04 01:26 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <wxadndUfm7aRRKL1nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #68219 |
On 6/3/25 4:01 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 03/06/2025 03:03, Borax Man wrote: >> On 2025-06-02, Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 6/2/25 04:35, Borax Man wrote: >>>> On 2025-05-31, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>> On 31/05/2025 18:27, rbowman wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 31 May 2025 11:07:00 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Britain had an Empire once that dealt with all sorts of people. We >>>>>>> aren't as insular as Americans. >>>>>> >>>>>> Then the chickens came home to roost... >>> >>> By which you mean that the former subjects of the Empire were free >>> to come to the UK if they knew their place and many of their children >>> are now participating in the governance of the UK and Commonweath. >>> Or am I wrong about that? >>> >> >> Now you are being colonised by the former subjects. Truly colonised in >> an irreversible way. India was able to get rid of you. >> >> The UK didn't replace Indian cities with Brits, but India will replace >> you. >> > Not really, India is OK. Indians are very British really. > > Its the Islamic invasion that is rather more worrying. > > >> Allowing free movement of former subjects will turn out to be a deadly >> mistake. >> > > It isn't free, its just a bit less restricted,. > > >> A people who decide to no longer exist or maintain their nation are just >> weak and not worthy of respect. >> > > It isn't the people who decide. It was a cabal of 'elites' lead by the EU. Just saying ..... THIS sort of stuff is probably BEST sent to the various 'political' newsgroups. Yep, "The Elites" are responsible for much - read your Machiavelli - BEEN that way for a LONG time. There is "consumer politics" and REALPOLITIK.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-04 06:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <maa6gmFgu7gU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #68297 |
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 01:26:39 -0400, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote in <wxadndUfm7aRRKL1nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com>: > On 6/3/25 4:01 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 03/06/2025 03:03, Borax Man wrote: >>> On 2025-06-02, Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 6/2/25 04:35, Borax Man wrote: >>>>> On 2025-05-31, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> On 31/05/2025 18:27, rbowman wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 31 May 2025 11:07:00 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Britain had an Empire once that dealt with all sorts of people. >>>>>>>> We aren't as insular as Americans. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then the chickens came home to roost... >>>> >>>> By which you mean that the former subjects of the Empire were >>>> free >>>> to come to the UK if they knew their place and many of their children >>>> are now participating in the governance of the UK and Commonweath. Or >>>> am I wrong about that? >>>> >>>> >>> Now you are being colonised by the former subjects. Truly colonised >>> in an irreversible way. India was able to get rid of you. >>> >>> The UK didn't replace Indian cities with Brits, but India will replace >>> you. >>> >> Not really, India is OK. Indians are very British really. >> >> Its the Islamic invasion that is rather more worrying. >> >> >>> Allowing free movement of former subjects will turn out to be a deadly >>> mistake. >>> >>> >> It isn't free, its just a bit less restricted,. >> >> >>> A people who decide to no longer exist or maintain their nation are >>> just weak and not worthy of respect. >>> >>> >> It isn't the people who decide. It was a cabal of 'elites' lead by the >> EU. > > > Just saying ..... THIS sort of stuff is probably BEST sent to the > various 'political' newsgroups. > > Yep, "The Elites" are responsible for much - read your Machiavelli - > BEEN that way for a LONG time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Prince#Other_interpretations > > There is "consumer politics" and REALPOLITIK. Indeed. Do you think Machiavelli was writing a manual? ObLinux: Tried booting linux-next-next-20250603 tonight on the workstation (bare metal), but couldn't get the NVIDIA drivers to build on it. Reluctantly went back to 6.15. -- -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090Ti 24G OS: Linux 6.15.0 D: Mint 22.1 DE: Xfce 4.18 Mem: 258G "Useless Invention: Matte finish floor wax."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 22 of 28 — ← Prev page 1 … 20 21 [22] 23 24 … 28 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web