Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #63096 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-12-26 08:41 -0500 |
| Last post | 2025-01-03 11:32 +0100 |
| Articles |
20 on this page of 1000+
— 42 participants
Thread has 1322 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed. |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Browse in flat view
Thread has 1322 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.
GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-26 08:41 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2024-12-26 17:13 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 10:57 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2024-12-26 19:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 11:59 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-26 20:22 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 12:37 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 14:26 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-27 14:41 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2024-12-27 10:42 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 16:23 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-28 07:25 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2024-12-28 15:12 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 14:51 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-29 11:14 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-29 17:57 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-29 14:36 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2024-12-29 16:00 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-29 17:06 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 04:28 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-30 09:22 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-30 08:40 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-30 23:01 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-30 18:18 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-31 03:04 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 11:01 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-31 20:08 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-31 20:29 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 08:32 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 10:55 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 08:53 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-31 20:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 10:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-12-31 06:04 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 09:39 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 17:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-31 18:56 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 13:21 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 13:16 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 19:39 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-28 13:50 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:22 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-27 07:56 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 08:00 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 20:52 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-27 09:25 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-27 10:08 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-12-27 06:34 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 00:10 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-28 08:22 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-12-28 11:04 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2024-12-28 17:21 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 12:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-28 12:47 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 19:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Diego Garcia <dg@chaos.rocks> - 2024-12-28 19:13 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-28 23:50 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 23:47 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-29 09:37 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:44 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-29 07:34 -0500
Re: GIMP (and digiKam and other photo management programs) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-29 22:02 +0000
Re: GIMP (and digiKam and other photo management programs) Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-29 18:56 -0500
Re: GIMP (and digiKam and other photo management programs) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 04:00 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 12:54 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-30 10:16 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-31 02:49 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 13:23 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 08:47 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-31 20:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 21:41 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 11:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-29 21:22 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lem Novantotto <Lem@none.invalid> - 2024-12-28 20:49 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 (and digiKam and showFoto) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-29 00:30 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 (and digiKam and showFoto) "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-29 01:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 (and digiKam and showFoto) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-29 01:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 (and digiKam and showFoto) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-29 21:53 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 (and digiKam and showFoto) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-29 14:06 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-12-29 08:15 +1000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:29 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-29 07:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 12:53 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-30 10:15 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-12-31 07:31 +1000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:40 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 08:55 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-31 20:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-01 01:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-01 07:53 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 21:46 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-01 12:49 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-01 21:09 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-01 21:59 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-01 23:16 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-02 02:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-02 12:30 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-02 20:04 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-03 01:50 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 03:13 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-03 12:32 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-03 11:48 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:13 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 06:44 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-03 06:58 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-03 12:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-03 08:32 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-03 14:02 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-03 11:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-03 16:43 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-03 13:37 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 01:57 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:13 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-04 06:16 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2025-01-04 10:58 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 18:01 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-04 15:48 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 23:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 23:43 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 13:06 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-05 12:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 20:52 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 00:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-05 09:14 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 22:25 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 23:54 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 13:21 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2025-01-05 10:17 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-04 13:43 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-04 15:54 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 21:50 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 00:11 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 13:01 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 22:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2025-01-05 10:36 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-05 13:22 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 20:57 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-06 08:49 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-06 15:02 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-06 14:06 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-06 19:09 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-06 15:54 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-06 16:20 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-06 17:37 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-06 22:57 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-07 08:43 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 09:17 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-07 11:26 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 11:48 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-07 13:14 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 13:30 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-07 13:44 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 14:07 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:00 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 09:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-07 16:35 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 17:46 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:12 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-07 21:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:16 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 12:12 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-08 09:45 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-07 22:47 +0000
Time machine backups Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-08 02:49 +0000
Re: Time machine backups vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-08 04:22 +0000
Re: Time machine backups Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-08 14:25 +0000
Re: Time machine backups D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:21 +0100
Re: Time machine backups The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 11:58 +0000
Re: Time machine backups Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-08 14:37 +0000
Re: Time machine backups Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-08 18:25 +0000
Re: Time machine backups Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2025-01-08 18:28 +0000
Re: Time machine backups Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-08 19:24 +0000
Re: Time machine backups vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-08 20:27 +0000
Re: Time machine backups D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 18:05 +0100
Re: Time machine backups "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-08 13:47 +0100
Re: Time machine backups The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 13:19 +0000
Re: Time machine backups D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:51 +0100
Re: Time machine backups The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:37 +0000
Re: Time machine backups D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 13:02 +0100
Re: Time machine backups The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:30 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-07 20:52 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 17:03 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:05 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 11:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-08 16:45 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 17:53 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 00:42 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 20:18 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 00:29 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 09:58 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> - 2025-01-09 15:17 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 18:50 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 10:20 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 10:43 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 18:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-10 07:31 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-10 04:09 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-10 09:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-10 04:35 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-10 09:52 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-10 06:17 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 00:25 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-10 09:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-10 21:58 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-11 07:16 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-09 10:55 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 19:00 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 19:06 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 19:02 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:58 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 13:07 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-09 06:56 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 10:35 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 18:52 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 19:20 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 13:08 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 19:01 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:56 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 13:07 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-09 08:48 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-09 16:14 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 17:35 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-10 02:19 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-10 08:59 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-09 17:48 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-10 06:55 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-10 09:35 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 13:16 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-10 13:57 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-10 16:20 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-11 07:08 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-11 07:21 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-11 08:28 -0500
What change of position? YA unsubstantiated claim from luzer-v (was: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-12 06:45 -0500
Re: What change of position? YA unsubstantiated claim from luzer-v (was: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-12 07:43 -0600
TL;DR: cry harder! (was: What change of position? YA unsubstantiated claim from luzer-v) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-12 14:08 -0500
Re: TL;DR: idiot and liar claims "victory"! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-12 22:50 -0600
Climate change mitigations Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-08 02:37 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-07 16:10 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-07 16:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 17:06 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:06 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 11:55 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 07:19 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 13:17 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 08:59 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 15:37 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 11:27 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 17:04 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 13:05 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 18:17 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 14:47 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 23:50 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 18:58 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 18:16 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:56 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 13:25 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 12:44 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:51 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 13:04 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:31 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 00:41 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 02:26 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 23:02 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 12:00 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 11:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 19:39 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-12 23:55 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:33 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 22:28 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 20:45 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 01:35 +0000
Races, Tribes and other ethnicities Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-15 02:33 +0000
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2025-01-15 06:30 +0200
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-15 00:49 -0500
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 10:12 +0100
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-15 10:53 +0000
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 18:55 +0100
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-15 18:28 +0000
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 22:16 +0100
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-16 10:21 +0000
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 17:05 +0100
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-16 00:11 -0500
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 16:52 +0100
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 01:19 -0500
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:49 +0100
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 22:51 -0500
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-18 10:46 +0000
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-18 11:51 +0100
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-15 10:51 +0000
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-15 23:17 -0500
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 06:20 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 09:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-15 10:59 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 18:58 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 22:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-16 00:48 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-16 10:26 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 17:05 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 00:25 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:47 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 22:50 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-18 10:45 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-18 11:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 22:04 +0000
Tribes and Ethnicities Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-16 13:30 +0000
Re: Tribes and Ethnicities Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2025-01-16 20:36 +0200
Re: Tribes and Ethnicities The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-16 18:50 +0000
Re: Tribes and Ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 21:15 +0100
Re: Tribes and Ethnicities The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-17 10:41 +0000
Re: Tribes and Ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 16:47 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 17:01 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 22:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:29 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 22:02 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 11:53 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 21:55 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:22 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 22:45 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-16 00:57 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 17:03 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 21:59 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-17 10:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-16 10:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 21:56 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:25 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-17 10:46 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 11:52 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 21:52 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:21 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-17 10:43 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 23:06 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-18 10:48 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-18 19:39 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-19 11:46 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-19 18:11 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-19 23:03 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-19 13:16 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-19 18:42 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-16 08:08 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 21:58 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:26 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 10:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 21:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-13 05:14 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-13 04:02 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:35 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 10:33 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 22:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:28 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 22:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 20:46 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 01:37 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 10:00 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-16 04:14 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-16 10:33 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 17:08 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 17:03 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 22:01 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:27 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:29 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 22:26 +0000
Biker Gangs Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-14 17:43 +0000
Re: Biker Gangs D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 22:02 +0100
Re: Biker Gangs rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 02:11 +0000
Re: Biker Gangs D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 10:04 +0100
Re: Biker Gangs The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-15 10:50 +0000
Re: Biker Gangs D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 18:54 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 19:46 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 10:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 11:54 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 21:13 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:26 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 21:53 +0000
Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-14 17:40 +0000
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 01:57 +0000
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-15 00:29 -0500
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 06:27 +0000
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-15 01:51 -0500
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 10:11 +0100
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 23:06 +0000
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 11:56 +0100
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-15 23:39 -0500
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 16:51 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 19:31 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 19:39 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-11 20:01 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 00:44 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 02:55 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 11:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 21:15 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:26 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 18:13 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 18:01 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 13:55 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 14:00 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 14:25 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Beavis <beavis@corn.holio> - 2025-01-09 04:16 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 10:34 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 10:38 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 11:27 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 11:34 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 11:51 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-10 02:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-09 11:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 11:47 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 12:12 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 18:56 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-08 19:57 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 12:04 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:46 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 10:16 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-07 11:47 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-06 18:35 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-02-08 06:41 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 02:36 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-08 13:21 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-08 18:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-08 18:17 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-08 19:28 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 13:41 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:23 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 23:07 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 11:41 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-09 20:46 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 07:33 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:08 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 19:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 22:44 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:04 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 20:28 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 22:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-10 23:14 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 11:58 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-10 20:03 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 12:03 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 19:43 +0000
Business cultures Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-11 20:32 +0000
Re: Business cultures D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 22:11 +0100
Re: Business cultures rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 22:15 +0000
Re: Business cultures rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 22:11 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 22:03 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 22:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-12 11:35 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 20:46 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-02-09 12:28 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-09 18:18 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-08 19:50 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 13:55 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 14:13 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-08 20:16 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:42 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 22:43 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-11 07:23 +1000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 22:51 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-11 21:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-12 11:31 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 23:36 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-09 07:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-09 03:18 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 11:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-09 18:08 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-09 22:32 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-09 11:32 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-09 19:21 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-09 21:54 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-10 09:30 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-02-11 07:44 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 07:53 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-14 05:10 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 23:29 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 08:17 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-12 20:20 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 20:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 13:21 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-13 21:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-12 17:09 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 14:54 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-13 04:01 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-12 23:41 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-13 11:21 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-13 22:10 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 22:17 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:43 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-14 20:17 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 22:51 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-14 05:20 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:46 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-15 23:30 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-02-15 21:48 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-16 11:44 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-19 20:10 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-16 11:45 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-13 08:03 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-13 18:14 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-02-15 07:34 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-02-15 21:35 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-16 03:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-15 22:51 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-16 04:51 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-02-16 01:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-02-13 07:34 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 21:10 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-02-15 07:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-11 21:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-11 21:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 22:20 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 20:57 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 02:55 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 23:06 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 06:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-09 14:23 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:45 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 22:44 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-09 22:37 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-10 07:57 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:15 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:05 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-09 21:06 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-10 08:02 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:18 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 15:56 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:39 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 22:41 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 07:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:08 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 19:44 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 22:45 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 01:45 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 12:14 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 19:26 +0000
Traveling and Travel Planning Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-11 20:10 +0000
Re: Traveling and Travel Planning rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 22:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 22:01 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 22:44 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-12 11:37 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 19:55 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-02-12 19:58 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-12 22:34 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-13 03:56 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-12 22:34 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-12 22:01 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-13 22:00 +0100
Travel Planning (was: Tasks where AI might be helpful) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-11 19:59 +0000
Re: Travel Planning (was: Tasks where AI might be helpful) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 22:07 +0100
Re: Travel Planning (was: Tasks where AI might be helpful) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 22:31 +0000
Re: Travel Planning (was: Tasks where AI might be helpful) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-12 11:35 +0100
Re: Travel Planning (was: Tasks where AI might be helpful) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-12 19:17 +0000
Re: Travel Planning (was: Tasks where AI might be helpful) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 19:43 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:35 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-10 07:48 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 20:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 22:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-10 20:00 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 03:42 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 00:53 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 12:01 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 01:23 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 12:10 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 07:55 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 21:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 20:50 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 19:45 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 22:04 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-10 23:42 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:42 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:37 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:30 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-10 07:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:14 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-11 21:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-12 11:33 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 16:00 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:26 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:25 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-08 22:16 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-08 23:41 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 23:42 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 11:49 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 11:38 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 22:46 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-10 07:59 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:17 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 19:53 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-10 22:41 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 23:40 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 11:47 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:49 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 22:48 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-09 23:03 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-10 18:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 16:03 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-08 19:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-08 19:53 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-08 22:19 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 14:23 -0700
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-10 18:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 22:41 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-10 19:11 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-02-11 05:04 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-02-11 05:18 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-10 18:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-10 15:55 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 01:59 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 00:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 06:46 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 02:04 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 19:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 20:43 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 02:49 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 22:50 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 06:28 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-12 12:25 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 10:16 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-12 18:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 18:50 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-12 16:24 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 07:35 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-13 11:22 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-12 09:08 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 18:58 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-12 16:56 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 07:22 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-12 20:20 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-12 17:16 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-14 05:00 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 22:44 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:51 +0000
(Excessive?) Complexity Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-08 18:57 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-08 19:31 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 23:23 -0500
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 11:45 +0100
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-09 19:49 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 22:39 +0100
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:21 -0600
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-09 22:43 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:56 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 22:50 +0100
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 07:50 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-10 08:35 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:20 +0100
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 19:02 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:09 +0100
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 18:58 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 22:42 +0100
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-09 11:32 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-09 19:43 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 22:49 -0500
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com - 2025-02-25 19:34 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-07 11:43 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 11:09 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-07 19:06 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 19:29 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 01:25 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 10:54 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-08 13:52 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 13:22 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 09:02 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 15:34 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 11:32 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 18:14 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 15:00 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 20:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 00:16 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 10:11 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 00:00 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-09 11:16 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:30 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 12:47 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:28 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 00:50 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:52 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-09 17:43 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:46 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 12:42 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 00:41 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 10:51 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 19:33 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 20:26 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:17 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 12:02 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 20:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 22:48 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 21:54 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-14 00:48 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 21:57 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-16 04:15 -0500
The Joys of African (and other 3rd world) construction projects Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-12 14:15 +0000
Re: The Joys of African (and other 3rd world) construction projects D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 19:47 +0100
Re: The Joys of African (and other 3rd world) construction projects Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-13 14:17 +0000
Re: The Joys of African (and other 3rd world) construction projects D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 21:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 00:04 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-09 11:18 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:33 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-09 15:38 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-10 07:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-10 03:34 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-10 09:09 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 01:15 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:15 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-10 07:12 -0500
Diversity - good or bad ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-10 21:17 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-10 22:45 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-11 01:11 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2025-01-11 05:23 +0200
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 00:48 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-11 07:02 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 09:00 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-11 19:50 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 19:19 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 02:02 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 22:19 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 06:51 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 11:09 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 20:46 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 20:48 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 00:43 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 11:05 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 11:49 +0100
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? Joerg Walther <joerg.walther@magenta.de> - 2025-01-12 14:06 +0100
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 19:40 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-12 13:46 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 14:00 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-12 14:52 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) root <NoEMail@home.org> - 2025-01-12 17:09 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 19:42 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-12 23:51 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:32 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 23:03 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2025-01-14 00:52 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-14 04:13 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-16 04:18 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 21:55 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-13 21:11 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-14 12:28 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 22:00 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-14 23:15 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 10:07 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-15 06:16 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-15 06:18 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 10:13 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-16 00:28 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-16 11:27 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-16 14:39 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 01:01 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-17 11:10 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 23:30 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 16:57 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 20:59 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:15 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-17 19:40 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-18 11:40 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-18 19:42 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-19 11:44 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 01:41 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:55 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-17 19:44 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-18 11:41 +0100
Scandinavian Humor and Other Myths Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-18 14:46 +0000
Re: Scandinavian Humor and Other Myths The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-18 15:03 +0000
Re: Scandinavian Humor and Other Myths D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-18 18:07 +0100
Re: Scandinavian Humor and Other Myths rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-18 19:36 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2025-01-12 18:53 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-13 13:06 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2025-01-13 16:17 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 20:51 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 20:23 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-13 13:40 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 17:08 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-13 00:31 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 06:33 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) root <NoEMail@home.org> - 2025-01-12 17:06 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2025-01-12 18:53 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:16 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 10:51 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 20:48 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2025-01-13 16:17 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 20:24 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 21:32 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2025-01-12 21:47 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-13 02:41 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) root <NoEMail@home.org> - 2025-01-13 03:00 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-13 13:47 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 22:56 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-12 23:29 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 06:24 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 10:23 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 00:44 +0100
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 02:10 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 11:53 +0100
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 21:03 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 10:56 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:13 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 09:21 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 14:58 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 00:44 +0100
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 11:03 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 19:36 +0100
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 20:30 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:20 +0100
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-13 04:32 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 12:03 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-12 23:42 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 10:38 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-13 13:11 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:04 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-11 19:52 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 19:21 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 02:23 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 23:00 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 06:59 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 10:46 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 20:54 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 10:44 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 10:39 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-10 22:15 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:06 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-11 20:00 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-11 21:57 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 02:33 +0000
The Joys of Motorola Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-12 14:40 +0000
Re: The Joys of Motorola rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 00:19 +0000
Re: The Joys of Motorola "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-13 03:56 -0500
Re: The Joys of Motorola rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 23:46 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 19:38 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 02:46 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 23:08 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 07:05 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-12 12:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 12:23 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 21:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-13 00:21 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 06:17 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-13 03:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-01-14 03:42 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-14 03:59 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 12:48 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:29 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 00:41 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 22:42 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-05 18:01 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-04 15:51 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 00:46 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 23:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 13:03 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 12:57 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-05 16:45 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-05 17:31 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 20:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-05 23:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-06 02:23 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-06 11:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-06 12:12 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-07 11:41 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 10:57 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 10:53 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 12:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:49 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-07 19:01 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-06 11:49 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-06 18:35 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-06 20:38 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-07 04:58 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-08 00:29 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 10:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 10:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 12:06 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:48 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:35 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 12:49 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-07 11:46 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 11:11 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-07 19:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-07 23:14 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:24 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 11:52 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:45 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 17:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:03 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-06 20:17 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-07 02:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-06 22:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-07 07:42 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 10:32 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-07 18:49 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-07 19:46 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-07 16:36 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 01:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-07 22:29 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 00:57 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-07 18:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 10:22 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-05 14:56 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 20:56 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-05 21:33 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-06 11:43 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-03 16:37 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:45 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:34 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:26 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 05:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:28 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 01:21 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 13:12 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 23:04 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-06 11:47 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-03 10:12 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:19 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:16 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 19:26 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Jack Sovalot <hee-cawkforme@jack.sovalot> - 2025-01-06 12:28 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-03 12:19 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 23:25 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:51 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 05:36 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-03 11:26 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 pH <wNOSPAMp@gmail.org> - 2025-01-03 19:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-03 19:59 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 21:37 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:43 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 02:06 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 00:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 06:16 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 02:16 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 10:09 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-04 18:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 20:48 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:36 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-04 07:29 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:15 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 12:23 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-04 10:18 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 06:08 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 02:30 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 10:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:44 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-04 18:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 21:00 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 12:58 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:35 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 02:16 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 13:19 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-06 22:52 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 10:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2025-01-07 13:23 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 18:49 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 01:30 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 12:00 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 17:25 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2025-01-08 18:34 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 18:52 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 18:55 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:53 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 13:05 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 00:51 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 00:19 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 06:08 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 02:24 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 19:15 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 19:05 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 19:53 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-04 10:05 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 22:11 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-04 23:39 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 00:43 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-04 19:20 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:06 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-03 20:36 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 02:09 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 02:56 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 09:39 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 10:15 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 21:04 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 00:06 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:12 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 01:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 13:15 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 02:43 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-01-05 03:33 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-01 17:31 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 08:21 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-01 21:33 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-01 23:26 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-02 01:42 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-02 01:52 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-02 02:09 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-02 04:05 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-02 12:27 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-02 10:18 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-02 12:33 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-03 01:35 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 08:30 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-03 11:32 +0100
Page 30 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 28 29 [30] 31 32 … 50 Next page →
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-08 23:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <IYRpP.52026$Wdz6.8877@fx16.iad> |
| In reply to | #65283 |
On 2025-02-08, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: > On Sat, 8 Feb 2025, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > >> On 2025-02-08, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 8 Feb 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> >>>> On 08/02/2025 07:36, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>>> >>>>> IMHO, a lot of this is just "busy work" from >>>>> people looking for something to do. Their >>>>> idea of "better" means "better for ME - and >>>>> screw YOU". It's not better for the average, >>>>> or even professional, user. >> >> I always loved that description of a piece of software: >> "It's a great improvement on its successors." >> >> <snip> >> >>> I am fascinated by the fact that when it comes to programming, there can >>> be an enormous disconnect between academic programmers, and a guy in his >>> room who just pounded out the code and got the work done. >>> >>> I'm not saying he did it in the most "elegant" way or the best documented >>> way, but I do claim that in many instances, the guy without the official >>> training is able to do it. >> >> And, in the end, his solution might be the more elegant one, >> in that it takes all sorts of real-world factors into account. >> >>> Reminds me of when I went to university. I often had to help the A >>> students with their practical assignments, and I got it done. On the >>> theory part however, they were always the A students. >> >> My university computer science courses left me quite disillusioned. >> Between my second and third years I managed to land a summer job >> programming in a small shop in the real world. For my third year >> I arranged my schedule so that I had Thursdays off, and continued >> to work at my part-time programming job. There was no fourth year - >> I dropped out and went full-time, and have been programming ever since. > > Were you successful? Did you become a powerful technologist with wealth > and many women? I found a niche job. Not wealthy, not hurting. And one woman is enough. I have strange ideas of success, so that'll do. -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | Growth for the sake of \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | growth is the ideology X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | of the cancer cell. / \ if you read it the right way. | -- Edward Abbey
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-08 23:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <3sWcnYNIZYawrzX6nZ2dnZfqnPsAAAAA@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #65286 |
On 2/8/25 6:41 PM, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On 2025-02-08, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: > >> On Sat, 8 Feb 2025, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >> >>> On 2025-02-08, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 8 Feb 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 08/02/2025 07:36, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> IMHO, a lot of this is just "busy work" from >>>>>> people looking for something to do. Their >>>>>> idea of "better" means "better for ME - and >>>>>> screw YOU". It's not better for the average, >>>>>> or even professional, user. >>> >>> I always loved that description of a piece of software: >>> "It's a great improvement on its successors." >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>>> I am fascinated by the fact that when it comes to programming, there can >>>> be an enormous disconnect between academic programmers, and a guy in his >>>> room who just pounded out the code and got the work done. >>>> >>>> I'm not saying he did it in the most "elegant" way or the best documented >>>> way, but I do claim that in many instances, the guy without the official >>>> training is able to do it. >>> >>> And, in the end, his solution might be the more elegant one, >>> in that it takes all sorts of real-world factors into account. >>> >>>> Reminds me of when I went to university. I often had to help the A >>>> students with their practical assignments, and I got it done. On the >>>> theory part however, they were always the A students. >>> >>> My university computer science courses left me quite disillusioned. >>> Between my second and third years I managed to land a summer job >>> programming in a small shop in the real world. For my third year >>> I arranged my schedule so that I had Thursdays off, and continued >>> to work at my part-time programming job. There was no fourth year - >>> I dropped out and went full-time, and have been programming ever since. >> >> Were you successful? Did you become a powerful technologist with wealth >> and many women? > > I found a niche job. Not wealthy, not hurting. And one woman is enough. > I have strange ideas of success, so that'll do. I went from niche to niche - and had fun. Vast wealth was never one of my goals. As I said to 'D' - not everybody defines "success" the same way.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-09 11:49 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <52909dfd-0fb6-39e4-04e4-4a3b8d3d044c@example.net> |
| In reply to | #65293 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: > On 2/8/25 6:41 PM, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >> On 2025-02-08, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 8 Feb 2025, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >>> >>>> On 2025-02-08, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, 8 Feb 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 08/02/2025 07:36, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> IMHO, a lot of this is just "busy work" from >>>>>>> people looking for something to do. Their >>>>>>> idea of "better" means "better for ME - and >>>>>>> screw YOU". It's not better for the average, >>>>>>> or even professional, user. >>>> >>>> I always loved that description of a piece of software: >>>> "It's a great improvement on its successors." >>>> >>>> <snip> >>>> >>>>> I am fascinated by the fact that when it comes to programming, there can >>>>> be an enormous disconnect between academic programmers, and a guy in his >>>>> room who just pounded out the code and got the work done. >>>>> >>>>> I'm not saying he did it in the most "elegant" way or the best >>>>> documented >>>>> way, but I do claim that in many instances, the guy without the official >>>>> training is able to do it. >>>> >>>> And, in the end, his solution might be the more elegant one, >>>> in that it takes all sorts of real-world factors into account. >>>> >>>>> Reminds me of when I went to university. I often had to help the A >>>>> students with their practical assignments, and I got it done. On the >>>>> theory part however, they were always the A students. >>>> >>>> My university computer science courses left me quite disillusioned. >>>> Between my second and third years I managed to land a summer job >>>> programming in a small shop in the real world. For my third year >>>> I arranged my schedule so that I had Thursdays off, and continued >>>> to work at my part-time programming job. There was no fourth year - >>>> I dropped out and went full-time, and have been programming ever since. >>> >>> Were you successful? Did you become a powerful technologist with wealth >>> and many women? >> >> I found a niche job. Not wealthy, not hurting. And one woman is enough. >> I have strange ideas of success, so that'll do. > > > I went from niche to niche - and had fun. Vast wealth > was never one of my goals. > > As I said to 'D' - not everybody defines "success" > the same way. > This is the truth! I knew a guy once who by now is probably in the several 100 millions of USD range. He sold his startup to IBM after 12 years and invested part of the money in a nature reserve for sea turtles. I always wonder about his current life style and if he still lives in the same apartment he did when I met him? After the regular golden handcuff period, he started another started, his 5:th I think. Will be interesting to see if he will sell it to IBM in another 12 years. =)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-09 11:38 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <0434bfdf-3cb5-8ffb-a817-a3a8046ba5ca@example.net> |
| In reply to | #65286 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On 2025-02-08, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: > >> On Sat, 8 Feb 2025, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >> >>> On 2025-02-08, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 8 Feb 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 08/02/2025 07:36, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> IMHO, a lot of this is just "busy work" from >>>>>> people looking for something to do. Their >>>>>> idea of "better" means "better for ME - and >>>>>> screw YOU". It's not better for the average, >>>>>> or even professional, user. >>> >>> I always loved that description of a piece of software: >>> "It's a great improvement on its successors." >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>>> I am fascinated by the fact that when it comes to programming, there can >>>> be an enormous disconnect between academic programmers, and a guy in his >>>> room who just pounded out the code and got the work done. >>>> >>>> I'm not saying he did it in the most "elegant" way or the best documented >>>> way, but I do claim that in many instances, the guy without the official >>>> training is able to do it. >>> >>> And, in the end, his solution might be the more elegant one, >>> in that it takes all sorts of real-world factors into account. >>> >>>> Reminds me of when I went to university. I often had to help the A >>>> students with their practical assignments, and I got it done. On the >>>> theory part however, they were always the A students. >>> >>> My university computer science courses left me quite disillusioned. >>> Between my second and third years I managed to land a summer job >>> programming in a small shop in the real world. For my third year >>> I arranged my schedule so that I had Thursdays off, and continued >>> to work at my part-time programming job. There was no fourth year - >>> I dropped out and went full-time, and have been programming ever since. >> >> Were you successful? Did you become a powerful technologist with wealth >> and many women? > > I found a niche job. Not wealthy, not hurting. And one woman is enough. > I have strange ideas of success, so that'll do. Excellent!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-09 20:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vob49i$q903$11@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #65286 |
On 08/02/2025 23:41, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >> Were you successful? Did you become a powerful technologist with wealth >> and many women? > I found a niche job. Not wealthy, not hurting. And one woman is enough. > I have strange ideas of success, so that'll do. I did end up with many women first, then a powerful technologist with money. In the end none of it was that important. It all 'just happened' while I was busy doing something else. -- The higher up the mountainside The greener grows the grass. The higher up the monkey climbs The more he shows his arse. Traditional
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-09 22:46 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <3a10433d-bf8f-7480-4d8c-191e4fd834c5@example.net> |
| In reply to | #65318 |
On Sun, 9 Feb 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 08/02/2025 23:41, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >>> Were you successful? Did you become a powerful technologist with wealth >>> and many women? >> I found a niche job. Not wealthy, not hurting. And one woman is enough. >> I have strange ideas of success, so that'll do. > > I did end up with many women first, then a powerful technologist with money. > In the end none of it was that important. It all 'just happened' while I was > busy doing something else. So would you have traded it for something else? My specialty is turning down women, because they do not reach my aesthetical standards! ;) When it comes to the powerful technologist with money part, how come your ego has not been inflated to dangerous levels, and you then continuing with moonshot projects or tanning your self in the adoration of the the public?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-10 07:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vocblv$145tu$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #65327 |
On 09/02/2025 21:46, D wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 9 Feb 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>
>> On 08/02/2025 23:41, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>>>> Were you successful? Did you become a powerful technologist with wealth
>>>> and many women?
>>> I found a niche job. Not wealthy, not hurting. And one woman is
>>> enough.
>>> I have strange ideas of success, so that'll do.
>>
>> I did end up with many women first, then a powerful technologist with
>> money.
>> In the end none of it was that important. It all 'just happened'
>> while I was busy doing something else.
>
> So would you have traded it for something else?
>
> My specialty is turning down women, because they do not reach my
> aesthetical standards! ;)
>
A gentleman never turns down a woman.
It took me a long time to learn how not to be one.
> When it comes to the powerful technologist with money part, how come
> your ego has not been inflated to dangerous levels, and you then
> continuing with moonshot projects or tanning your self in the adoration
> of the the public?
Where's the fun in that?
I'd rather watch the sun go down than a rocket go up.
Hell is being noticed by people.
--
“The fundamental cause of the trouble in the modern world today is that
the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt."
- Bertrand Russell
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-10 12:17 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1eff17be-4352-4c2a-c85b-05e0044c7dda@example.net> |
| In reply to | #65342 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 09/02/2025 21:46, D wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, 9 Feb 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> >>> On 08/02/2025 23:41, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >>>>> Were you successful? Did you become a powerful technologist with wealth >>>>> and many women? >>>> I found a niche job. Not wealthy, not hurting. And one woman is enough. >>>> I have strange ideas of success, so that'll do. >>> >>> I did end up with many women first, then a powerful technologist with >>> money. >>> In the end none of it was that important. It all 'just happened' while I >>> was busy doing something else. >> >> So would you have traded it for something else? >> >> My specialty is turning down women, because they do not reach my >> aesthetical standards! ;) >> > A gentleman never turns down a woman. > It took me a long time to learn how not to be one. Haha, my wife caught me, before I learned how to be a gentleman. ;) >> When it comes to the powerful technologist with money part, how come your >> ego has not been inflated to dangerous levels, and you then continuing with >> moonshot projects or tanning your self in the adoration of the the public? > > Where's the fun in that? Personally, no idea! > I'd rather watch the sun go down than a rocket go up. > > Hell is being noticed by people. This is the truth. Wealth beyond a certain point, creates a golden cage for you. I have not yet worked out where that limit is. It depends, of course, on the country you're in. In sweden, it could be as low as 100 million EUR.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-10 19:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m0v3p3FjfdvU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #65342 |
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 07:59:59 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > I'd rather watch the sun go down than a rocket go up. One evening I watched the sun go down from a remote area in Nevada where I was camping. As I admired the night sky a rocket went up. It was damn impressive. I wasn't sure if WWIII was starting but when I got back to civilization I found out it was a test launch of a Poseidon missile. I don't know if it was intentional but on a beautiful summer evening with people sitting outside most of the west coast noticed. My brother was the rocket scientist in the family so I've also seen a launch at Vandenberg. It was a daytime launch but when you're a few miles away it's hard to miss.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-10 22:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5budnam4UfRHWzf6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #65365 |
On 2/10/25 2:53 PM, rbowman wrote: > On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 07:59:59 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> I'd rather watch the sun go down than a rocket go up. > > One evening I watched the sun go down from a remote area in Nevada where I > was camping. As I admired the night sky a rocket went up. It was damn > impressive. The sun goes down every day, to no real meaning. The rocket going up however means The Future, a thousand dreams and aspirations. Gimme a Musk every time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-08 23:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <3sWcnYBIZYYjrDX6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #65283 |
On 2/8/25 4:16 PM, D wrote: > > > On Sat, 8 Feb 2025, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > >> On 2025-02-08, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 8 Feb 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> >>>> On 08/02/2025 07:36, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>>> >>>>> IMHO, a lot of this is just "busy work" from >>>>> people looking for something to do. Their >>>>> idea of "better" means "better for ME - and >>>>> screw YOU". It's not better for the average, >>>>> or even professional, user. >> >> I always loved that description of a piece of software: >> "It's a great improvement on its successors." >> >> <snip> >> >>> I am fascinated by the fact that when it comes to programming, there can >>> be an enormous disconnect between academic programmers, and a guy in his >>> room who just pounded out the code and got the work done. >>> >>> I'm not saying he did it in the most "elegant" way or the best >>> documented >>> way, but I do claim that in many instances, the guy without the official >>> training is able to do it. >> >> And, in the end, his solution might be the more elegant one, >> in that it takes all sorts of real-world factors into account. >> >>> Reminds me of when I went to university. I often had to help the A >>> students with their practical assignments, and I got it done. On the >>> theory part however, they were always the A students. >> >> My university computer science courses left me quite disillusioned. >> Between my second and third years I managed to land a summer job >> programming in a small shop in the real world. For my third year >> I arranged my schedule so that I had Thursdays off, and continued >> to work at my part-time programming job. There was no fourth year - >> I dropped out and went full-time, and have been programming ever since. > > Were you successful? Did you become a powerful technologist with wealth > and many women? Not everybody defines "success" the same way :-) Me, my social skills are more like "Sheldon", so I'd have had to make billions and know a good yacht-designer to find nubile insincere women who could ignore that :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-09 11:47 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <6637a9f3-c9bf-2303-d9be-e2bd360a5b7c@example.net> |
| In reply to | #65292 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: > On 2/8/25 4:16 PM, D wrote: >> >> >> On Sat, 8 Feb 2025, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >> >>> On 2025-02-08, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 8 Feb 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 08/02/2025 07:36, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> IMHO, a lot of this is just "busy work" from >>>>>> people looking for something to do. Their >>>>>> idea of "better" means "better for ME - and >>>>>> screw YOU". It's not better for the average, >>>>>> or even professional, user. >>> >>> I always loved that description of a piece of software: >>> "It's a great improvement on its successors." >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>>> I am fascinated by the fact that when it comes to programming, there can >>>> be an enormous disconnect between academic programmers, and a guy in his >>>> room who just pounded out the code and got the work done. >>>> >>>> I'm not saying he did it in the most "elegant" way or the best documented >>>> way, but I do claim that in many instances, the guy without the official >>>> training is able to do it. >>> >>> And, in the end, his solution might be the more elegant one, >>> in that it takes all sorts of real-world factors into account. >>> >>>> Reminds me of when I went to university. I often had to help the A >>>> students with their practical assignments, and I got it done. On the >>>> theory part however, they were always the A students. >>> >>> My university computer science courses left me quite disillusioned. >>> Between my second and third years I managed to land a summer job >>> programming in a small shop in the real world. For my third year >>> I arranged my schedule so that I had Thursdays off, and continued >>> to work at my part-time programming job. There was no fourth year - >>> I dropped out and went full-time, and have been programming ever since. >> >> Were you successful? Did you become a powerful technologist with wealth and >> many women? > > > Not everybody defines "success" the same way :-) Oh, I let the definition of success be done by the speaker. =) > Me, my social skills are more like "Sheldon", so I'd > have had to make billions and know a good yacht-designer > to find nubile insincere women who could ignore that :-) Nah... don't you think a few 100 millions would be enough? ;) Another option might be to find a nice Sheldonesque female with photo model qualities? =D
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-09 20:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vob4cj$q903$12@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #65292 |
On 09/02/2025 04:40, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: > nubile insincere women The problem is either they wont let go of you or you cant let go of them. Dont mock human nature. It will bite you on the bum. -- The higher up the mountainside The greener grows the grass. The higher up the monkey climbs The more he shows his arse. Traditional
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-09 22:48 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <a4e0abee-79cd-c1f7-29e3-3e63f381a0b3@example.net> |
| In reply to | #65319 |
On Sun, 9 Feb 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 09/02/2025 04:40, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: >> nubile insincere women > > The problem is either they wont let go of you or you cant let go of them. > Dont mock human nature. It will bite you on the bum. > I remember once when I was in Paris for work. I had a good quarter so we went to come club and bought champagne. 60 seconds later two good looking women turn up and were very friendly as long as the champagne flowed. ;) I also remember another time in Boston, on a nother job trip, and a customer wanted champagne, so why not? After about 10 minutes of waiting I got my bottle and when I turned around the customer had left. I tried to give it away, but no one wanted it since they thought it was poisoned so in the end I just left it somewhere and left. These and more can be found in the book Stories from my youth part 1. ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-09 23:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnvqid1e.2k9fk.lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> |
| In reply to | #65328 |
And where can the book be found?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-10 18:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnvqkhku.1ksd4.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> |
| In reply to | #65292 |
WokieSux282@ud0s4.net <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> wrote at 04:40 this Sunday (GMT): > On 2/8/25 4:16 PM, D wrote: [snip] >> Were you successful? Did you become a powerful technologist with wealth >> and many women? > > > Not everybody defines "success" the same way :-) > > Me, my social skills are more like "Sheldon", so I'd > have had to make billions and know a good yacht-designer > to find nubile insincere women who could ignore that :-) Same, with the social skills. -- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-12 16:03 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <voj5rp$2gvt0$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #65283 |
On 2/8/25 3:16 PM, D wrote: > > Were you successful? Did you become a powerful technologist with wealth > and many women? Hehe :) Look at the mind of this creature. You'll be wiped away sooner than growing out of that "world". Cro-magnons are goners.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-08 19:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vo8b6g$69pr$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #65271 |
On 08/02/2025 17:59, D wrote: > > > On Sat, 8 Feb 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> On 08/02/2025 07:36, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>> IMHO, a lot of this is just "busy work" from >>> people looking for something to do. Their >>> idea of "better" means "better for ME - and >>> screw YOU". It's not better for the average, >>> or even professional, user. >> >> In my careers - I have had several - us Engineers were humble >> creatures who wrote clean workmanlike well documented and tested code >> in the hope that no one would ever have to write it again, and if they >> did, it would be instantly understandable. Code was. to quote my >> friend 'Higgy', 'all just bits, in silicon'. >> >> Later I encountered computer scientists who spoke a strange language >> with artistic terms in it like 'elegance' 'intellectual purity' >> 'algorithmic efficiency' 'Turing complete' 'object oriented' and >> other words that seemed to have nothing whatever to do with actually >> writing testing and debugging clean code that met the spec and worked >> in a timescale less than eternity... >> >> I decided they were all frustrated ArtStudents™ with Physics envy who >> could not do HardSums™ > > Haha, brilliant! > >> And should never be let anywhere near a critical project. > > I am fascinated by the fact that when it comes to programming, there can > be an enormous disconnect between academic programmers, and a guy in his > room who just pounded out the code and got the work done. > > I'm not saying he did it in the most "elegant" way or the best > documented way, but I do claim that in many instances, the guy without > the official training is able to do it. > > Reminds me of when I went to university. I often had to help the A > students with their practical assignments, and I got it done. On the > theory part however, they were always the A students. There is computer science, and there is software engineering. Textbooks on software engineering are worth reading -- "The great thing about Glasgow is that if there's a nuclear attack it'll look exactly the same afterwards." Billy Connolly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-08 19:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m0pr1dForauU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #65274 |
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 19:27:12 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > There is computer science, and there is software engineering. > Textbooks on software engineering are worth reading Unless you fall in with Booch & Co.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-08 22:19 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <c78ec6bb-5cfb-72f4-3e2d-b9cf13778119@example.net> |
| In reply to | #65274 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 08/02/2025 17:59, D wrote: >> >> >> On Sat, 8 Feb 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> >>> On 08/02/2025 07:36, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>>> IMHO, a lot of this is just "busy work" from >>>> people looking for something to do. Their >>>> idea of "better" means "better for ME - and >>>> screw YOU". It's not better for the average, >>>> or even professional, user. >>> >>> In my careers - I have had several - us Engineers were humble creatures >>> who wrote clean workmanlike well documented and tested code in the hope >>> that no one would ever have to write it again, and if they did, it would >>> be instantly understandable. Code was. to quote my friend 'Higgy', 'all >>> just bits, in silicon'. >>> >>> Later I encountered computer scientists who spoke a strange language with >>> artistic terms in it like 'elegance' 'intellectual purity' 'algorithmic >>> efficiency' 'Turing complete' 'object oriented' and other words that >>> seemed to have nothing whatever to do with actually writing testing and >>> debugging clean code that met the spec and worked in a timescale less than >>> eternity... >>> >>> I decided they were all frustrated ArtStudents™ with Physics envy who >>> could not do HardSums™ >> >> Haha, brilliant! >> >>> And should never be let anywhere near a critical project. >> >> I am fascinated by the fact that when it comes to programming, there can be >> an enormous disconnect between academic programmers, and a guy in his room >> who just pounded out the code and got the work done. >> >> I'm not saying he did it in the most "elegant" way or the best documented >> way, but I do claim that in many instances, the guy without the official >> training is able to do it. >> >> Reminds me of when I went to university. I often had to help the A students >> with their practical assignments, and I got it done. On the theory part >> however, they were always the A students. > > There is computer science, and there is software engineering. > Textbooks on software engineering are worth reading I don't think I ever had the patience to become a professional programmer. When I graduated there was no market for programmers, so I ended up in infrastrucutre, or what the young whipper snappers now a days call "devops". My most powerful software was a multi-path checker to a storage system that held a lot of pension money. It was written in bash. =D Ok, ok... I wrote a GUI for some kind of batch job mgmt software that IBM hobbled together in order to trace dependencies, that was done in python. Apart from that, I don't think I ever did much programming that was not related to devops and getting servers to do their job and monitor them, and deploying them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 30 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 28 29 [30] 31 32 … 50 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web