Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #64371 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-01-14 23:37 -0500 |
| Last post | 2025-01-17 10:48 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 389 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc
News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-14 23:37 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 10:10 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-15 23:29 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmpereComputing Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-16 05:03 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 11:58 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-16 11:18 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 17:12 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-01-17 07:35 +1000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 23:58 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2025-01-17 12:20 +1000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 00:46 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-17 07:05 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 03:20 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 08:17 -0800
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:32 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-17 19:37 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-18 11:39 +0100
Raspberry NAS, anyone? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-18 14:57 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-18 20:05 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-19 11:47 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-19 13:14 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-19 23:02 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-20 09:07 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-19 18:33 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-20 10:30 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-20 10:10 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-20 13:51 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-20 21:58 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-20 20:04 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-21 10:13 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-21 18:55 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-22 10:28 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-22 18:50 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-01-23 06:47 +1000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-22 22:34 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-23 00:00 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-23 16:42 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-23 16:13 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-23 21:59 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-24 01:57 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-24 00:52 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-24 19:13 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 01:24 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 02:02 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-25 19:35 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-24 11:21 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-24 20:27 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 01:26 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2025-01-25 17:14 +1000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 11:24 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-24 11:16 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-24 19:16 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 00:58 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 11:04 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-22 22:29 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-22 23:58 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-23 16:40 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-23 00:37 +0000
Maker spaces Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-23 02:17 +0000
Re: Maker spaces rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-23 04:50 +0000
Re: Maker spaces Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-23 13:38 +0000
Re: Maker spaces Joe Makowiec <makowiec@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-24 01:48 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-23 16:46 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-23 16:32 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-01-24 06:22 +1000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-24 09:44 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2025-01-25 17:36 +1000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 11:39 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-25 19:41 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-22 21:38 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-23 04:56 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-22 20:34 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-23 05:07 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-23 03:10 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-23 09:15 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-23 08:58 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-23 15:08 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-23 17:58 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-23 13:44 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-23 09:05 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-23 15:06 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-23 10:15 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-23 15:57 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-23 17:55 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-23 22:07 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-23 16:53 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-21 19:30 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-22 07:50 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-22 10:35 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-21 09:43 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-20 21:53 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-20 19:42 -0500
Synology Diskstation architecture (was: Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-21 02:48 +0000
Re: Synology Diskstation architecture (was: Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-20 23:29 -0500
Re: Synology Diskstation architecture (was: Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-22 20:56 +0000
Re: Synology Diskstation architecture (was: Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-22 18:47 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-21 10:12 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-21 19:56 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-21 19:17 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-22 10:32 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-22 21:29 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-23 16:51 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-23 19:18 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-24 10:27 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-24 11:46 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-24 19:21 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-24 18:57 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-24 23:16 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 01:39 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 11:07 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-24 19:24 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-24 23:19 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-25 00:55 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 02:27 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 11:34 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 11:36 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 18:34 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 17:54 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 23:33 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 00:14 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 21:24 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-26 09:49 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 15:30 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 20:25 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 10:03 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-27 19:01 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 22:25 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 22:38 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 10:44 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 11:43 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 18:35 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 18:03 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 23:35 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-25 19:29 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 23:38 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 00:00 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 22:01 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 13:39 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 20:01 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 09:57 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 11:37 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 20:40 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 10:07 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-27 09:44 +0000
Political evolution (Libertarianism) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-26 00:36 +0000
Re: Political evolution (Libertarianism) Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2025-01-26 05:31 +0200
Re: Political evolution (Libertarianism) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 22:36 -0500
Re: Political evolution (Libertarianism) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 19:25 +0000
Re: Political evolution (Libertarianism) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 11:44 +0100
Re: Political evolution (Libertarianism) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 19:33 +0000
Re: Political evolution (Libertarianism) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 09:55 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 21:32 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 03:33 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-26 03:49 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 21:13 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-26 18:30 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-27 00:42 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186283@ud0s4.net" <186284@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-27 00:03 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-27 05:53 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-27 01:22 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-27 18:54 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-27 22:20 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-28 05:36 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-28 02:24 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-28 20:01 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-28 21:23 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-28 23:11 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-29 03:45 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-29 04:23 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-29 06:02 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-28 20:28 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-28 21:42 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-01-29 07:22 +1000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-29 15:14 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-28 23:58 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-29 15:19 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-28 16:20 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-29 15:12 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-30 01:15 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-30 05:43 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-30 01:01 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-30 10:37 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-30 10:01 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-30 18:41 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-30 05:08 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-30 18:43 +0100
Turn your Radio On Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-30 14:05 +0000
Re: Turn your Radio On D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-30 18:49 +0100
Re: Turn your Radio On rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-30 19:35 +0000
Re: Turn your Radio On D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-30 22:15 +0100
Re: Turn your Radio On rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 01:18 +0000
Re: Turn your Radio On D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-31 13:47 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-30 17:24 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-30 19:43 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-30 22:16 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-30 22:07 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-31 13:41 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 01:43 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-30 21:24 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 06:26 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-31 13:49 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 19:36 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-31 23:37 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 05:16 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-01 11:37 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-31 13:49 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-31 13:48 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-30 10:33 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-30 09:33 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-30 17:31 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-30 19:45 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-30 20:13 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-30 20:39 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-30 21:25 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-30 21:19 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-30 22:54 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-30 20:43 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 06:22 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-01-31 08:08 +1000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 01:35 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-01-31 04:49 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-31 00:44 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 06:49 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-31 02:09 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-31 10:33 +0000
Turn Your Radio On ... Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-31 16:48 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-31 23:03 +0100
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-31 20:08 -0500
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 04:36 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-02-01 05:05 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-01 01:52 -0500
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-02-01 17:40 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 08:14 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-01 19:47 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-01 19:57 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-01 20:13 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-02 00:24 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-02 06:10 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-02 20:41 -0500
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-02 10:20 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-02 20:27 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-02 21:00 -0500
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-01 17:08 -0500
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-02 10:18 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-02 20:54 -0500
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-01 19:49 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-01 01:22 -0500
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-01 11:28 +0100
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 18:42 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-02 11:39 +0100
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-02 10:43 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-02 21:56 +0100
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-03 03:25 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-03 22:55 +0100
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-04 00:36 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-03 22:52 -0500
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-04 17:35 +0100
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-04 17:28 +0100
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-02 20:31 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-02 21:59 +0100
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-02 01:11 -0500
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-02 11:49 +0100
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 04:28 +0000
Re: Turn Your Radio On ... D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-01 11:32 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 19:30 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-31 23:36 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 04:45 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-01 11:34 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 18:47 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-31 22:54 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 04:57 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-01 11:35 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-01 11:27 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-31 10:29 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-02-01 04:11 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-01 05:00 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-02-02 04:13 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 06:44 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-31 18:21 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 19:47 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-31 10:24 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-02-01 04:34 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 10:09 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-27 09:46 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 17:45 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-27 21:55 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-28 10:27 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-27 09:26 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-27 09:00 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 13:01 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 02:10 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 11:29 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 11:22 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 18:30 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-25 19:22 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 23:37 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 21:29 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 13:00 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-26 09:25 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 13:45 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-26 12:52 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 17:30 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 20:27 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 10:05 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-27 09:41 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 17:44 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-27 20:15 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 22:26 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-24 21:40 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 01:28 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-25 03:49 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 02:16 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-25 19:24 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 10:46 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-25 19:44 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 23:40 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 00:09 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 22:21 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-26 09:39 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 13:48 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-26 13:12 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 17:32 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 20:12 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 10:01 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-27 20:30 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 22:28 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-27 19:45 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-28 05:38 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-28 03:13 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-28 10:25 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-28 20:01 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-28 21:41 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-27 22:00 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 20:09 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-27 10:00 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 13:41 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 11:38 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 00:53 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 11:04 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-25 11:19 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 18:29 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 00:12 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 10:51 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-25 20:01 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-25 23:41 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 21:53 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 13:38 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 00:12 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-25 22:22 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-26 13:42 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-26 09:40 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-22 07:48 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-22 10:34 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-22 20:11 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-22 22:31 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-22 22:55 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-23 00:05 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-22 21:34 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-23 16:53 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-23 16:34 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-23 22:02 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-22 20:08 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-22 23:55 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-21 18:22 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:20 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-17 10:33 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 16:46 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-01-18 07:45 +1000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-18 11:45 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-18 19:26 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-19 11:42 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-19 19:03 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-19 23:08 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-19 18:52 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-20 09:08 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmpereComputing Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-20 23:29 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmpereComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-20 20:26 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-20 10:36 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-19 18:44 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 08:14 -0800
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-20 16:39 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 09:00 -0800
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-20 13:56 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-20 21:57 +0100
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-17 10:19 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 08:04 -0800
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmpereComputing Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-17 23:12 +0000
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 00:28 -0500
Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:48 +0100
Page 9 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 20 Next page →
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-27 18:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lvq33sFjf80U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #64879 |
On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 01:22:57 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: > Maybe even more, and intentionally, suppressed > was "Monster" because it was Too True. Haven't heard that on the air > SINCE the 60s. There aren't many stations left that would play a nine minute cut of anything. Steppenwolf was one of my favorites. It's one of the few albums I can remember where and when I bought it. I was at the SUNY Albany bookstore with my girlfriend and saw the record. This was before 'Easy Rider' so they were relatively unknown. I bought it more or less becase of Hesse. I never saw the original band but I did see Kay years later in the '90s. > And who plays Zappa music ? One of the local stations did a New Years Day thing called Frank & Frank, intermixing Sinatra and Zappa. I've got to say I preferred the Sinatra cuts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-27 22:20 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <FYSdnUNY9OSb0AX6nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #64899 |
On 1/27/25 1:54 PM, rbowman wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 01:22:57 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> Maybe even more, and intentionally, suppressed >> was "Monster" because it was Too True. Haven't heard that on the air >> SINCE the 60s. > > There aren't many stations left that would play a nine minute cut of > anything. Steppenwolf was one of my favorites. It's one of the few albums > I can remember where and when I bought it. I was at the SUNY Albany > bookstore with my girlfriend and saw the record. This was before 'Easy > Rider' so they were relatively unknown. I bought it more or less becase of > Hesse. > > I never saw the original band but I did see Kay years later in the '90s. > >> And who plays Zappa music ? > > One of the local stations did a New Years Day thing called Frank & Frank, > intermixing Sinatra and Zappa. I've got to say I preferred the Sinatra > cuts. Well, admitted, FZ is an "acquired taste" :-) However he did have one of the best BS detectors ever - up there with George Carlin and Sam Clemens. The odd FZ sound was from him being an enthusiast of some 'experimental' euro composers. Jeff Beck once related the sheer torture of auditioning for a slot in "The Mothers" ... hyper-exotic time signatures and such :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-28 05:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lvr8m5Fpc5vU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #64915 |
On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 22:20:40 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: > The odd FZ sound was from him being an enthusiast of some > 'experimental' euro composers. Jeff Beck once related the sheer > torture of auditioning for a slot in "The Mothers" ... hyper-exotic > time signatures and such Reminds me of a Willie Nelson and Johnny Cash duet. Cash asked what key it was in and when Nelson replied something like F# Major poor old Johnny said 'I figured...'
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-28 02:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5nednb1i5_TMGwX6nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #64916 |
On 1/28/25 12:36 AM, rbowman wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 22:20:40 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> The odd FZ sound was from him being an enthusiast of some >> 'experimental' euro composers. Jeff Beck once related the sheer >> torture of auditioning for a slot in "The Mothers" ... hyper-exotic >> time signatures and such > > Reminds me of a Willie Nelson and Johnny Cash duet. Cash asked what key it > was in and when Nelson replied something like F# Major poor old Johnny > said 'I figured...' You really should find Beck's remarks. ZappaMusic was NOT remotely simple. There WAS a plan, but it was barely in the human realm :-) I'll stick to the statement that FZ had one of the world's best BS detectors ....... SOMEWHERE I found a very old TV show clip that featured Zappa - pre-goatee - kinda trying to instruct a bunch of kiddies on percussion and rhythm. Kinda hilarious and foreboding at the same time. He'd already gone off the main path. "Dhina-moe watched from the edge of the bed, with her lips just a-twitchin' and her face gone red ........." :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-28 20:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <NIamP.1037699$2xE6.230858@fx18.iad> |
| In reply to | #64916 |
On 2025-01-28, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 22:20:40 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> The odd FZ sound was from him being an enthusiast of some >> 'experimental' euro composers. Jeff Beck once related the sheer >> torture of auditioning for a slot in "The Mothers" ... hyper-exotic >> time signatures and such That's what made the band so amazing. They could turn on a dime. > Reminds me of a Willie Nelson and Johnny Cash duet. Cash asked what key it > was in and when Nelson replied something like F# Major poor old Johnny > said 'I figured...' Or, as they said in _O Brother Where Art Thou_, "in the neighborhood of B". Our little bluegrass group does a couple of pieces in C# minor. -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | Growth for the sake of \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | growth is the ideology X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | of the cancer cell. / \ if you read it the right way. | -- Edward Abbey
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-28 21:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lvt075F3dt1U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #64932 |
On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 20:01:49 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > Our little bluegrass group does a couple of pieces in C# minor. For whatever perverted reason? Do you hate banjo players?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-28 23:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <cudmP.56$HO1.45@fx14.iad> |
| In reply to | #64942 |
On 2025-01-28, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 20:01:49 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > >> Our little bluegrass group does a couple of pieces in C# minor. > > For whatever perverted reason? Do you hate banjo players? That's why God created capos. For me as a fiddler and mandolin player, whenever I see a guitarist putting a capo on the 4th fret, I know I'm in for trouble. Why is it that female vocalists love to sing in B? -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | Growth for the sake of \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | growth is the ideology X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | of the cancer cell. / \ if you read it the right way. | -- Edward Abbey
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-29 03:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lvtmioF6iahU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #64945 |
On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 23:11:04 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On 2025-01-28, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 20:01:49 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >> >>> Our little bluegrass group does a couple of pieces in C# minor. >> >> For whatever perverted reason? Do you hate banjo players? > > That's why God created capos. For me as a fiddler and mandolin player, > whenever I see a guitarist putting a capo on the 4th fret, > I know I'm in for trouble. > > Why is it that female vocalists love to sing in B? I don't sing or play in a group so keys are sort of a moot point. I do play whistle and Irish flute so a lot of what I know is in D or G, or mixolydian and ionian, I guess. I've got a couple of whistles in other keys and a cheap Boehm flute if I want to get adventuresome. For guitar I favor A, C, E, and G and the related minors. For banjo I usually stick with the standard open G or sometimes G modal. I use A and E mostly for blues stuff with a pentatonic scale. I've got a capo around someplace but if you're not working with a singer it isn't too useful.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-29 04:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <Q2imP.85653$nlJ1.1084@fx41.iad> |
| In reply to | #64949 |
On 2025-01-29, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
> I don't sing or play in a group so keys are sort of a moot point. I do
> play whistle and Irish flute so a lot of what I know is in D or G, or
> mixolydian and ionian, I guess.
Plus a few in aeolian, I presume. :-)
> I've got a couple of whistles in other
> keys and a cheap Boehm flute if I want to get adventuresome.
>
> For guitar I favor A, C, E, and G and the related minors. For banjo I
> usually stick with the standard open G or sometimes G modal. I use A and E
> mostly for blues stuff with a pentatonic scale.
I've built a list of favourite keys for various instruments.
(Note how it runs around the circle of fifths.)
G - banjo
D - fiddle or mandolin (alternate)
A - fiddle or mandolin (primary)
E - guitar
B - female singers
> I've got a capo around someplace but if you're not working with a singer
> it isn't too useful.
Depends. In my guitar days when I was playing with another guitarist
I would sometimes put on a capo (e.g. he plays in D, I play in C capo 2)
so I could get different voicings for the same chords, just for a bit of
variety.
--
/~\ Charlie Gibbs | Growth for the sake of
\ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | growth is the ideology
X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | of the cancer cell.
/ \ if you read it the right way. | -- Edward Abbey
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-29 06:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lvtujoF7vh9U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #64950 |
On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 04:23:12 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > Depends. In my guitar days when I was playing with another guitarist I > would sometimes put on a capo (e.g. he plays in D, I play in C capo 2) > so I could get different voicings for the same chords, just for a bit of > variety. It makes the F# a little handier too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-28 20:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vnbem8$1vqpp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #64899 |
rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 01:22:57 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> Maybe even more, and intentionally, suppressed >> was "Monster" because it was Too True. Haven't heard that on the air >> SINCE the 60s. > > There aren't many stations left that would play a nine minute cut of > anything. Yeah, doing so would cut into their desperate need to do one or both of: 1) run commercial breaks every 3.75 minutes when they actually play any music; 2) have the dj run his mouth for 20 minutes on something none of us cares one iota about.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-28 21:42 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <5d42f419-8930-26b3-b8c9-69dbcadedf9b@example.net> |
| In reply to | #64934 |
On Tue, 28 Jan 2025, Rich wrote: > rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >> On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 01:22:57 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: >> >>> Maybe even more, and intentionally, suppressed >>> was "Monster" because it was Too True. Haven't heard that on the air >>> SINCE the 60s. >> >> There aren't many stations left that would play a nine minute cut of >> anything. > > Yeah, doing so would cut into their desperate need to do one or both of: > > 1) run commercial breaks every 3.75 minutes when they actually play any > music; > > 2) have the dj run his mouth for 20 minutes on something none of us > cares one iota about. What about web radio? Are there any gems there? I listen to two radio stations. One is a jazz station that is private but very weird. They have no commercials except commercials for tickets to jazz concerts. I have no clue have they manage to stay in business. The other one is BBC, which _occasionally_ have interesting programs. The problem is that 90% of the times they are talking about arabia, climate or gender issues, so most of it is not so interesting.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-29 07:22 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <67994a84@news.ausics.net> |
| In reply to | #64938 |
D <nospam@example.net> wrote: > What about web radio? Are there any gems there? I listen to two radio > stations. One is a jazz station that is private but very weird. They have > no commercials except commercials for tickets to jazz concerts. I have no > clue have they manage to stay in business. Another is ABC Jazz. It's government-funded, so that's how they avoid ads: http://live-radio02.mediahubaustralia.com/JAZW/mp3/ > The other one is BBC, which _occasionally_ have interesting programs. The > problem is that 90% of the times they are talking about arabia, climate or > gender issues, so most of it is not so interesting. I don't listen to talk stations. ABC have some but they'll be as bad or worse than the BBC. ABC Classic is their other musical option (5min news bulletins aside), which I listen to on real radio: http://live-radio01.mediahubaustralia.com/2FMW/mp3/ -- __ __ #_ < |\| |< _#
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-29 15:14 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <9c8e821f-746d-ddd7-09b9-29bff8b98020@example.net> |
| In reply to | #64941 |
On Tue, 29 Jan 2025, Computer Nerd Kev wrote: > D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >> What about web radio? Are there any gems there? I listen to two radio >> stations. One is a jazz station that is private but very weird. They have >> no commercials except commercials for tickets to jazz concerts. I have no >> clue have they manage to stay in business. > > Another is ABC Jazz. It's government-funded, so that's how they > avoid ads: > http://live-radio02.mediahubaustralia.com/JAZW/mp3/ > >> The other one is BBC, which _occasionally_ have interesting programs. The >> problem is that 90% of the times they are talking about arabia, climate or >> gender issues, so most of it is not so interesting. > > I don't listen to talk stations. ABC have some but they'll be as > bad or worse than the BBC. ABC Classic is their other musical > option (5min news bulletins aside), which I listen to on real > radio: > http://live-radio01.mediahubaustralia.com/2FMW/mp3/ Thank you very much. Those are saved in the bookmarks folder.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-28 23:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vnbque$21n98$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #64938 |
On 28/01/2025 20:42, D wrote: > > > On Tue, 28 Jan 2025, Rich wrote: > >> rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 01:22:57 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>> >>>> Maybe even more, and intentionally, suppressed >>>> was "Monster" because it was Too True. Haven't heard that on the air >>>> SINCE the 60s. >>> >>> There aren't many stations left that would play a nine minute cut of >>> anything. >> >> Yeah, doing so would cut into their desperate need to do one or both of: >> >> 1) run commercial breaks every 3.75 minutes when they actually play any >> music; >> >> 2) have the dj run his mouth for 20 minutes on something none of us >> cares one iota about. > > What about web radio? Are there any gems there? I listen to two radio > stations. One is a jazz station that is private but very weird. They > have no commercials except commercials for tickets to jazz concerts. I > have no clue have they manage to stay in business. > ClassicFM.com has few adverts and plays the more accessible and popular classical music. There are stations like classicrock etc but accessing those tends to be 'our way or the highway' > The other one is BBC, which _occasionally_ have interesting programs. > The problem is that 90% of the times they are talking about arabia, > climate or gender issues, so most of it is not so interesting. -- New Socialism consists essentially in being seen to have your heart in the right place whilst your head is in the clouds and your hand is in someone else's pocket.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-29 15:19 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <a013c344-c2e9-01d7-ba56-46725bc7d1b4@example.net> |
| In reply to | #64946 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Tue, 28 Jan 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 28/01/2025 20:42, D wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, 28 Jan 2025, Rich wrote: >> >>> rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >>>> On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 01:22:57 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>>> >>>>> Maybe even more, and intentionally, suppressed >>>>> was "Monster" because it was Too True. Haven't heard that on the air >>>>> SINCE the 60s. >>>> >>>> There aren't many stations left that would play a nine minute cut of >>>> anything. >>> >>> Yeah, doing so would cut into their desperate need to do one or both of: >>> >>> 1) run commercial breaks every 3.75 minutes when they actually play any >>> music; >>> >>> 2) have the dj run his mouth for 20 minutes on something none of us >>> cares one iota about. >> >> What about web radio? Are there any gems there? I listen to two radio >> stations. One is a jazz station that is private but very weird. They have >> no commercials except commercials for tickets to jazz concerts. I have no >> clue have they manage to stay in business. >> > ClassicFM.com has few adverts and plays the more accessible and popular > classical music. > > There are stations like classicrock etc but accessing those tends to be 'our > way or the highway' Thank you, will have a look! > >> The other one is BBC, which _occasionally_ have interesting programs. The >> problem is that 90% of the times they are talking about arabia, climate or >> gender issues, so most of it is not so interesting. > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-28 16:20 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <L-OcnbDpO-S-1wT6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #64934 |
On 1/28/25 3:28 PM, Rich wrote: > rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >> On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 01:22:57 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: >> >>> Maybe even more, and intentionally, suppressed >>> was "Monster" because it was Too True. Haven't heard that on the air >>> SINCE the 60s. >> >> There aren't many stations left that would play a nine minute cut of >> anything. > > Yeah, doing so would cut into their desperate need to do one or both of: > > 1) run commercial breaks every 3.75 minutes when they actually play any > music; > > 2) have the dj run his mouth for 20 minutes on something none of us > cares one iota about. That's kind of the case of US commercial radio these days. Of course it was kind of like that for a long time music/ads/music/ads timed I think by the length of a 45 record. FM radio used to run longer stuff, but that's RARE now. However I did hit on an FM station that ran the entire "In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida" not too long ago. The DJ must have had the runs or something and needed to spend 17 minutes on the can :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-29 15:12 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <b63f90c0-28ea-2f05-1a65-ab975ae6b112@example.net> |
| In reply to | #64940 |
On Tue, 28 Jan 2025, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: > On 1/28/25 3:28 PM, Rich wrote: >> rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 01:22:57 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>> >>>> Maybe even more, and intentionally, suppressed >>>> was "Monster" because it was Too True. Haven't heard that on the air >>>> SINCE the 60s. >>> >>> There aren't many stations left that would play a nine minute cut of >>> anything. >> >> Yeah, doing so would cut into their desperate need to do one or both of: >> >> 1) run commercial breaks every 3.75 minutes when they actually play any >> music; >> >> 2) have the dj run his mouth for 20 minutes on something none of us >> cares one iota about. > > That's kind of the case of US commercial radio > these days. Of course it was kind of like that > for a long time music/ads/music/ads timed I think > by the length of a 45 record. FM radio used to > run longer stuff, but that's RARE now. > > However I did hit on an FM station that ran the > entire "In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida" not too long ago. > The DJ must have had the runs or something and > needed to spend 17 minutes on the can :-) What about AM? Maybe that's where the good stuff lives?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-30 01:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vnejs4$2ki6m$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #64960 |
D <nospam@example.net> wrote: > > > On Tue, 28 Jan 2025, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> On 1/28/25 3:28 PM, Rich wrote: >>> rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >>>> On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 01:22:57 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>>> >>>>> Maybe even more, and intentionally, suppressed >>>>> was "Monster" because it was Too True. Haven't heard that on the air >>>>> SINCE the 60s. >>>> >>>> There aren't many stations left that would play a nine minute cut of >>>> anything. >>> >>> Yeah, doing so would cut into their desperate need to do one or both of: >>> >>> 1) run commercial breaks every 3.75 minutes when they actually play any >>> music; >>> >>> 2) have the dj run his mouth for 20 minutes on something none of us >>> cares one iota about. >> >> That's kind of the case of US commercial radio >> these days. Of course it was kind of like that >> for a long time music/ads/music/ads timed I think >> by the length of a 45 record. FM radio used to >> run longer stuff, but that's RARE now. >> >> However I did hit on an FM station that ran the >> entire "In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida" not too long ago. >> The DJ must have had the runs or something and >> needed to spend 17 minutes on the can :-) > > What about AM? Maybe that's where the good stuff lives? In the US, depending upon where you are geographically, AM is one of: 1) talk radio 2) bible radio (i.e., also talk, but where they talk about how if you just accept Jesus into your heart *now* you'll be saved, but only if you first send $29.95/month to Mr Jim Jones to support his parish mission)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-30 05:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <6kEmP.115368$HxS1.51714@fx39.iad> |
| In reply to | #64970 |
On 2025-01-30, Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote:
> In the US, depending upon where you are geographically, AM is one of:
>
> 1) talk radio
>
> 2) bible radio (i.e., also talk, but where they talk about how if you
> just accept Jesus into your heart *now* you'll be saved, but only if
> you first send $29.95/month to Mr Jim Jones to support his parish
> mission)
I was driving home, early Sunday morning
Through Bakersfield, listening to gospel music
on the colored radio station
And the preacher said,
"You know, you've aaaaaaaalways got the Loooooord by your side."
I was so pleased to be informed of this
That I ran twenty red lights in His honor.
Thank you, Jesus. Thank you, Lord.
-- Rolling Stones: Faraway Eyes
I drove through Bakersfield late one night years ago.
There were Bible thumpers all up and down the dial.
--
/~\ Charlie Gibbs | Growth for the sake of
\ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | growth is the ideology
X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | of the cancer cell.
/ \ if you read it the right way. | -- Edward Abbey
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 9 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 20 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web