Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #61808 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-12-07 02:33 -0500 |
| Last post | 2024-12-09 22:35 +0100 |
| Articles |
20 on this page of 1000+
— 22 participants
Thread has 1096 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed. |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Browse in flat view
Thread has 1096 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.
Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-07 02:33 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 14:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 18:35 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-07 18:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 19:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 23:33 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 04:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 12:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2024-12-11 17:13 +1000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 04:21 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 12:12 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-08 16:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 21:50 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 23:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 10:47 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-09 15:35 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 16:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 22:42 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-10 04:41 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:47 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 22:37 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 19:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-07 23:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? BlueManedHawk <bluemanedhawk@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 15:15 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-07 21:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 04:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-08 04:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 08:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-08 02:37 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 08:15 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 13:41 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-08 16:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-08 18:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-09 01:13 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 00:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-08 01:08 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 08:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 14:58 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-08 16:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-08 21:54 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 23:07 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-08 23:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-09 00:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-09 00:20 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-10 04:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-10 01:11 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 10:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 12:49 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-09 17:23 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 17:27 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-09 23:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 10:23 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-10 11:16 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 21:49 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 00:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 10:26 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-10 04:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 14:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-10 04:55 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 14:34 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 20:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:55 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 21:59 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-11 13:49 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 17:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-11 16:44 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 21:59 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 02:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 10:32 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 20:57 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 11:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 11:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 02:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 10:27 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-12 19:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 21:29 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-13 13:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 11:43 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 19:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 20:21 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:29 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:18 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 01:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 11:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 18:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 23:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 03:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:30 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-15 21:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 23:12 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 03:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:29 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 00:54 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:56 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-17 04:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 19:48 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 11:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 14:29 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 14:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 19:41 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 20:44 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:26 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-17 10:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 19:54 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 22:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:47 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 20:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 10:49 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-09 23:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 10:22 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 20:00 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 22:07 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 23:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-11 03:55 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 11:01 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-11 01:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2024-12-11 04:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-11 13:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 11:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 02:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2024-12-12 04:06 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 08:50 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 10:53 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 20:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 21:34 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 02:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:25 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 21:00 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 12:03 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 19:47 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 20:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:30 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:21 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 01:37 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 11:33 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 01:52 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:58 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 20:55 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2024-12-17 04:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 20:36 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-18 00:31 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:05 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 20:50 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 21:46 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 03:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:30 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 20:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:09 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-18 19:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 23:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 09:42 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:39 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 15:58 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 15:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 16:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-19 19:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 22:41 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:49 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 18:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:16 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 10:23 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 21:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-12 23:42 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 08:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2024-12-13 09:37 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 11:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 11:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:08 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-12 11:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-11 13:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-10 05:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-10 01:49 -0500
Joy of Hydrogen (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-11 13:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-08 23:00 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-09 00:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-09 01:16 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 10:53 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 12:55 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 21:50 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 21:17 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 23:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 10:58 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-11 10:37 +0000
Joy of Nuclear Power (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-11 13:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 17:17 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-11 16:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 21:56 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-12 10:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 16:13 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-12 15:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 21:28 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-12-13 06:42 +1000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:00 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 10:58 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-12-14 07:51 +1000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 11:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-12-14 11:37 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 13:55 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-12-15 10:07 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-15 11:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-12-15 16:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-15 16:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 19:03 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-12 21:31 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:09 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 11:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 11:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 13:32 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 19:11 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 19:02 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:15 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 02:16 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 11:42 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-15 12:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 17:59 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 18:41 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 23:01 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 03:57 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:38 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 20:36 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:22 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 21:23 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-19 00:00 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 11:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-20 01:31 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:57 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 11:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 15:59 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 17:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:22 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 03:09 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:25 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 02:30 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:22 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-23 01:34 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-20 21:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 11:59 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 13:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 19:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 19:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 11:40 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 17:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:21 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 03:00 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 20:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 02:27 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 07:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 08:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 20:06 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 11:43 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:47 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:12 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 21:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 12:47 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 20:00 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 22:54 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:23 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 20:32 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 11:50 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:35 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:09 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 20:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 22:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 01:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 15:15 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 20:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 22:57 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 00:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 12:21 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 19:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 22:52 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 02:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:44 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 18:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-26 19:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 00:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-27 17:37 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-26 22:41 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 05:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-27 23:44 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-28 16:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:27 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-27 23:51 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:42 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:13 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-27 18:06 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 01:16 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 00:02 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 06:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 02:31 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:50 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-28 17:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? pH <wNOSPAMp@gmail.org> - 2025-01-01 05:15 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-27 17:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-23 21:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 01:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 12:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:22 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 13:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 23:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 19:07 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 23:21 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-20 01:33 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 11:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 14:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 14:07 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 19:43 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 20:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:21 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-17 10:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 21:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-18 09:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:15 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 23:01 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 04:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:41 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 21:07 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:38 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 21:38 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 03:07 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:55 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 20:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:53 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 21:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 21:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 23:55 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 07:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 11:01 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:44 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 21:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-12 23:37 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 11:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 11:33 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:08 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 11:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 21:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 12:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 19:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:16 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 02:06 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-15 00:17 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 11:40 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-15 12:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 17:57 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 19:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 23:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 03:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:37 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 20:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:23 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-17 10:21 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 19:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 21:22 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2024-12-19 04:42 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:42 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 17:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 19:05 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 21:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:17 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 22:21 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:46 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 18:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 20:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:38 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 02:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 21:23 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:02 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 15:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 08:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 21:54 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 00:50 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 08:42 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 20:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 22:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 01:23 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 15:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 19:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 22:40 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 01:15 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 12:27 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 19:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 22:55 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-25 20:08 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 19:15 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-26 21:41 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 04:57 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-27 00:54 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-27 09:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 18:04 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:16 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 01:52 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 11:02 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 01:45 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 11:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:39 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 21:27 +0000
The Joy of Tax Havens Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-29 00:53 +0000
Re: The Joy of Tax Havens D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:22 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 21:07 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-27 09:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:32 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 18:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 23:22 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:07 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:25 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 18:30 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:24 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 01:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:33 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 11:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 20:57 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 20:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:24 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 02:47 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:42 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-25 20:04 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 04:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 14:35 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:12 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 23:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:08 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 11:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 11:53 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 12:04 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 12:41 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-30 12:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 20:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 11:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:53 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-31 20:44 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-01 12:52 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-01 22:10 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-02 12:16 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-02 20:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-03 00:58 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 08:36 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-03 12:23 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 23:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:53 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 06:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:41 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 01:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:36 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:32 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 21:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 19:47 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 13:07 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-30 12:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 20:21 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-30 20:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:44 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 01:32 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 20:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 01:25 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:58 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 20:15 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-29 00:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 01:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 01:01 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 01:00 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 07:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 11:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 12:38 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-30 12:30 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:34 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 11:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-31 20:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 22:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-01 12:47 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-01 12:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-01 12:37 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-01 21:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 00:11 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 06:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 01:58 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 07:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 03:22 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 11:55 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 20:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 20:02 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 23:43 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 11:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 23:47 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-29 00:59 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-22 17:23 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 22:55 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-23 01:12 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 08:57 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 20:22 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:52 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-23 20:58 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 12:44 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 00:17 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-16 21:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:42 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 21:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:12 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 23:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 16:01 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 15:35 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 17:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 18:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 01:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:32 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 18:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:24 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:13 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 18:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:24 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 00:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:02 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 19:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 23:22 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 19:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 02:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:35 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 19:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:34 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 01:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:07 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 21:04 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 11:55 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:23 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 23:09 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 01:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:26 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 20:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-23 21:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 02:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 14:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-27 18:41 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-23 00:35 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 06:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:46 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 21:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 12:53 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 19:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 22:52 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 01:49 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 12:34 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 19:38 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 22:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 01:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:28 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 19:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:17 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 18:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:29 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 01:02 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:23 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 21:36 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:26 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 19:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 13:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 20:30 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:45 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-26 03:06 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 04:50 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:46 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-24 00:58 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 15:21 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-24 19:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 22:46 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 01:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 12:30 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-25 20:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 23:05 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 03:27 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 19:31 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:21 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 19:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 00:27 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 00:06 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 20:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:17 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 11:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-28 17:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-28 17:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 20:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-29 00:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 01:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-29 16:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 19:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 13:08 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 20:32 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:46 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:02 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 12:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-29 16:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 19:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 12:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-30 12:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 20:44 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 11:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:48 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-01 03:23 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-01 12:58 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-01 22:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-02 12:17 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-02 20:36 +0000
The Joys of Marriage (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-03 02:02 +0000
Re: The Joys of Marriage (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 03:24 +0000
Re: The Joys of Marriage (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-03 12:34 +0100
Re: The Joys of Marriage (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-03 23:41 +0000
Re: The Joys of Marriage (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:54 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-03 12:25 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 23:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:55 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 06:57 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-04 07:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:42 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 20:49 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:18 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 20:15 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 13:15 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 20:13 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:42 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-25 20:34 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-26 04:39 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-26 12:33 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 19:02 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 18:06 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:16 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-19 16:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 17:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 19:07 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 18:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:18 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 11:51 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 16:02 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 20:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 02:32 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:38 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 12:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 19:30 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 02:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:11 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 21:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:05 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 17:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-19 19:35 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-19 20:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 02:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 19:03 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-19 19:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-19 20:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 02:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:30 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 18:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:28 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 22:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:01 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 01:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-21 03:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 01:53 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 13:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 23:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 19:58 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 11:41 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 07:37 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 20:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-21 21:04 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 11:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 02:44 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:40 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 01:51 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 08:53 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 19:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 22:28 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 10:00 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:17 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 13:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 23:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 09:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:26 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-23 01:59 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 09:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 13:03 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 21:29 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 21:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 01:53 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 09:22 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:03 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-22 17:23 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 22:59 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 01:12 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 08:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 13:00 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:28 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 21:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 12:55 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 14:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-27 18:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:23 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 02:00 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 10:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 21:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-27 19:33 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 00:13 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 23:34 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 02:39 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-28 12:11 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 23:10 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 01:50 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 10:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:09 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 22:17 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 09:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 23:02 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:34 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Don_from_AZ <djatechNOSPAM@comcast.net.invalid> - 2024-12-23 09:29 -0700
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 21:55 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-24 00:33 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 15:18 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 15:18 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 17:15 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 19:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 02:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:37 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 20:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 01:00 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-21 12:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 21:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 11:56 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:37 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 18:59 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 22:29 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-19 19:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-19 16:30 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-20 00:44 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:45 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:31 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 11:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 16:04 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 20:58 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 21:21 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 03:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-12-13 06:59 +1000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-13 11:03 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 01:05 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:45 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 01:02 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 14:32 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:36 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 21:57 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 23:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 11:00 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-11 02:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 11:06 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-11 10:26 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 17:15 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 02:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-10 22:49 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 23:25 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 10:44 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 13:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 21:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 00:52 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 10:30 +0100
Linux 6.12.4 (was: Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-12-10 11:47 +0000
Re: Linux 6.12.4 (was: Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-11 01:02 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:11 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 21:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-12 03:42 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 10:52 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-12 11:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-12 16:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 20:44 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-12 23:29 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-13 11:02 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 21:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-13 23:17 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-13 23:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 12:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 18:56 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-14 20:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:27 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 02:18 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 11:44 +0100
The Joy of *small* business Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-14 21:26 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:31 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-15 14:08 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-15 14:15 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 18:05 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 18:02 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 19:47 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 23:10 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 00:04 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:44 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 21:18 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-16 21:14 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 04:07 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:49 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-17 10:28 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 21:41 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 00:05 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 07:09 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-18 10:01 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 19:11 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-18 20:15 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 23:02 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 05:09 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 11:07 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:08 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:59 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 22:32 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 05:06 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:01 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 19:43 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 22:03 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 05:14 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 09:59 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business Don_from_AZ <djatechNOSPAM@comcast.net.invalid> - 2024-12-19 09:45 -0700
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 19:06 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 09:56 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 19:08 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-19 16:35 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 03:32 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 03:56 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 05:05 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:42 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 11:00 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 21:56 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 05:25 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 09:50 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 19:49 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 09:47 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-18 10:00 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 23:28 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-19 00:16 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:17 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:15 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-20 03:22 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 09:18 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 11:45 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 01:23 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-21 09:54 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 21:45 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 09:40 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:06 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 22:04 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 05:46 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 02:12 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 09:31 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 09:53 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:28 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 15:22 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 22:54 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 08:46 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:59 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-23 00:13 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-23 06:09 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 08:15 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-23 18:20 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 21:29 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 09:10 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-24 02:10 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-23 06:26 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:55 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 09:10 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:43 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-24 01:57 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-24 15:28 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-24 21:08 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-25 12:36 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 20:54 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 23:42 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-23 09:05 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-24 01:24 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:38 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-22 12:24 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-22 21:12 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:15 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-22 23:14 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-23 12:35 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-22 09:29 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-20 11:38 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 20:30 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-21 01:40 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-21 08:15 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:34 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-18 20:17 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:40 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-19 10:27 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 23:32 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:52 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 19:56 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 21:38 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:24 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 23:38 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 11:00 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-17 23:56 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:31 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 21:49 -0500
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:56 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:47 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 22:31 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:28 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 23:48 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 10:54 +0100
Re: The Joy of *small* business rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 19:22 +0000
Re: The Joy of *small* business D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-20 10:27 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 23:07 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 02:24 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 11:46 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-15 19:43 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-15 23:09 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-16 03:31 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 10:35 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-16 20:50 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 03:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:34 +0100
Newsreader mechanicals Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-17 20:17 +0000
Re: Newsreader mechanicals Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-17 18:41 -0500
Re: Newsreader mechanicals D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 19:58 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-17 20:21 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:03 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-17 20:28 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:03 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-19 00:10 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-19 11:09 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 11:46 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 14:28 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 11:40 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 14:25 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 14:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 08:42 -0800
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-16 17:35 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 19:45 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 12:17 -0800
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-17 10:20 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-16 19:41 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-18 00:16 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-18 20:36 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 12:19 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-14 12:14 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 00:47 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-10 00:42 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 10:28 +0100
Hydrogen Cars (Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-11 12:48 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-09 00:07 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-09 06:14 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-11 00:54 -0500
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-12-11 20:54 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-12 03:08 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-09 14:10 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 13:30 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-09 14:51 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-09 16:01 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-09 22:34 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 09:56 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:19 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 22:40 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 16:27 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-10 21:54 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-10 23:20 +0000
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-11 10:59 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-202412.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2024-12-11 21:49 +0100
Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-09 22:35 +0100
Page 26 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 24 25 [26] 27 28 … 50 Next page →
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-29 07:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ltccvuFb5sU8@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #63261 |
On Sun, 29 Dec 2024 01:58:50 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > IMHO, like with Chinese theology, if you weren't raised, saturated, > in it then you're never REALLY gonna 'get it'. > Religions and cultures are usually tightly-entwined. Then there's Shinto with an infinite number of kami and a Buddhist monk on speed dial in case Uncle Hayao kicks off. There is a Shinto shrine in Washington State but I have no idea how you export that to the round eyes. In the spirit of DEI, Christian weddings are very popular in Japan. I think most of the priests are fakes; the real ones cost more. > Still, the Parent/Child/Sub-Child aspect of Hindu IS kinda > interesting. It all started with Auðumbla and Ymir. When you stare at the Abyss it's interesting what crawls out.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-29 03:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kCudna62tsVWm-z6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #63264 |
On 12/29/24 2:45 AM, rbowman wrote: > On Sun, 29 Dec 2024 01:58:50 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > > >> IMHO, like with Chinese theology, if you weren't raised, saturated, >> in it then you're never REALLY gonna 'get it'. >> Religions and cultures are usually tightly-entwined. > > Then there's Shinto with an infinite number of kami and a Buddhist monk on > speed dial in case Uncle Hayao kicks off. There is a Shinto shrine in > Washington State but I have no idea how you export that to the round eyes. > > In the spirit of DEI, Christian weddings are very popular in Japan. I > think most of the priests are fakes; the real ones cost more. > >> Still, the Parent/Child/Sub-Child aspect of Hindu IS kinda >> interesting. > > It all started with Auðumbla and Ymir. When you stare at the Abyss it's > interesting what crawls out. Cow gods ? That theology came well AFTER Sumeria. Ultra-great grandpappy/granny must have been really fond of cows :-) The current Most Annoying is what those who built Gobekli Tepi had in mind. They added lots of symbols with a likely 'religious' meaning - but forgot to include any DETAILS. Likely assumed everybody would "just know" 12,000 years later. First 'details' show up at the dawn of the Mesopotamian era - but that's "Enki", not cows or anything. Enki was fond of 'fish themes'. However it did reportedly inform about civil-structure/engineering issues. The later city-states copied. Enki seemed to be a pretty good, umm, dude.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-29 11:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vkrdbm$ut02$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #63266 |
On 29/12/2024 08:22, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > The current Most Annoying is what those who built > Gobekli Tepi had in mind. They added lots of symbols > with a likely 'religious' meaning - but forgot to > include any DETAILS. Likely assumed everybody would > "just know" 12,000 years later. I wonder what on earth people in 12000 years time will make of Debian release names. "Named after household gods" ? -- There’s a mighty big difference between good, sound reasons and reasons that sound good. Burton Hillis (William Vaughn, American columnist)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-29 20:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ltdoh4F7nkqU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #63287 |
On Sun, 29 Dec 2024 11:55:34 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 29/12/2024 08:22, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >> The current Most Annoying is what those who built >> Gobekli Tepi had in mind. They added lots of symbols with a likely >> 'religious' meaning - but forgot to include any DETAILS. Likely >> assumed everybody would "just know" 12,000 years later. > > I wonder what on earth people in 12000 years time will make of Debian > release names. > "Named after household gods" ? Bookworm? Bullseye? Not as bad as Ubuntu's Ruptured Ringtail system or Android's Ice Cream Sandwich.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-29 20:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ltdo6dF7nkqU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #63266 |
On Sun, 29 Dec 2024 03:22:34 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > The current Most Annoying is what those who built Gobekli Tepi had in > mind. They added lots of symbols with a likely 'religious' meaning - > but forgot to include any DETAILS. Likely assumed everybody would > "just know" 12,000 years later. Certainly. There is a Runic inscription that transliterates to ALU. It shows up in several places but it isn't clear what it means. It's not like the 'Haldan was here' graffiti in Istanbul or the monuments. The valknut is another common symbol that seems to be associated with Wotan but nobody knows what it even was called.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-29 23:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <_tKdnfT_lseUuO_6nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #63308 |
On 12/29/24 3:02 PM, rbowman wrote: > On Sun, 29 Dec 2024 03:22:34 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> The current Most Annoying is what those who built Gobekli Tepi had in >> mind. They added lots of symbols with a likely 'religious' meaning - >> but forgot to include any DETAILS. Likely assumed everybody would >> "just know" 12,000 years later. > > Certainly. There is a Runic inscription that transliterates to ALU. It > shows up in several places but it isn't clear what it means. It's not like > the 'Haldan was here' graffiti in Istanbul or the monuments. The valknut > is another common symbol that seems to be associated with Wotan but nobody > knows what it even was called. True Believers ... they just assume they are 101% RIGHT and thus every detail and aspect of their theology is just SURE to last until eternity. As for the Norse religion ... a big big problem is that the writing-system during its beginning period was just fer-shit. All we "know" is in the form of "as told by, as told to, as told by ....." Might be ten percent of the original info remaining uncorrupted.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-29 11:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vkrd6g$ut02$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #63261 |
On 29/12/2024 06:58, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > IMHO, like with Chinese theology, if you weren't raised, > saturated, in it then you're never REALLY gonna 'get it'. > Religions and cultures are usually tightly-entwined. Odd. My experience is that looking at religions from the outside, I know far more about them than their practitioners and believers do. I think the expereince of WW2 left my parents generation a bit too grown up for it all. -- There’s a mighty big difference between good, sound reasons and reasons that sound good. Burton Hillis (William Vaughn, American columnist)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-29 23:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <gjKdna3JB7-Su-_6nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #63285 |
On 12/29/24 6:52 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 29/12/2024 06:58, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >> IMHO, like with Chinese theology, if you weren't raised, >> saturated, in it then you're never REALLY gonna 'get it'. >> Religions and cultures are usually tightly-entwined. > > Odd. My experience is that looking at religions from the outside, I know > far more about them than their practitioners and believers do. Might seem so ... but don't get cocky. > I think the expereince of WW2 left my parents generation a bit too grown > up for it all. Well, if they were into the all-powerful/all-good god thing, then yea. If they still made offerings to Woden then not so much :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-29 00:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vTednWCH58LMeO36nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #63196 |
On 12/28/24 5:58 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 28/12/2024 06:25, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >> As for BRITS ... 'unbroken' maybe means a few thousand >> years - but with every wave of invaders the 'gods' got >> mixed, re-named, re-statused - and some just disappeared. >> > Indeed. The Celtic pantheon of nature spirits remains a dismal parody of > its formal self with just a few faeries, leprechauns and of course the > Morrigan. > >> Kinda like Hindu 'paganism' - the idea of god-beings with >> such extreme power and 'generative potential' that a mere >> passing thought could pop another god or god-like thing >> into existence on the spot ... a nice kinda 'fractal' >> look and feel 🙂 >> > I cant see how Hinduism could have a pantheon. At its core its mostly > philosophy. > > I always thought that their gods were understood to be symbols, nor 'real' Then explain all those temples ... to specific gods, with faces :-) SOMETIMES the gods are 'ideas'/'ideals', SOMETIMES they manifest materially. >> Know nothing about Chinese theology alas ... other than >> that it had a lot of 'demons'. Gotta look into that. May >> NOT entirely 'get it' alas because I wasn't born Chinese. >> 'Gods' kinda COMPLEMENT the culture rather than CREATE it. >> > > Japanese is ancestor worship. A little more complex than that ... >> Oh, good movie/Harry Potter question - how come all >> 'spells' are done in LATIN ??? Did spirits/gods/etc >> from 10,000 years ago all speak Latin too ??? 🙂 > > Well traditionally necromancy texts were written in Hebrew or Latin, as > there was a close association between the religion and its antithesis.🙂 > > Although IIRC HP Lovecraft had a mad Arab somewhere on his demonology. > Abdul Alhazred, creator of the Necronomicon. > > I mean it wouldn't make good drama for our Harry to mutter ' I say > great spiwwit, turn Malfoy into a spotted toad' > > Clever people spoke Latin or Greek, back in the day. :-) If you want demonology, Persian or Babylonian might be more productive. Hey, they were a BIG DEAL for a LONG time. The first 'god' to be mentioned however was Sumerian, "Enki" (spelling varies). It liked 'fish' themes and supposedly imparted all kinds of civil-structure and civil-engineering info mostly to the citizens of Eridu (now Kuwait). Uruk and Ur copied. Great luck that paper hadn't been invented yet - those clay tablets are REALLY 'archival media'. The even older works at Gobekli Tepe imply even earlier gods/religions - but there's no real DETAIL. It's kinda like finding a 'cross' symbol but with no clue as to what it MEANS to anybody, no background. I guess the builders "just knew" and ASSUMED everyone would 'get it' forever and ever. Sumerian tales have been kinda well translated at this point. Especially study the hero/demigod guy named 'Gilgamesh'. Probably the first cite of a 'Hercules'-type figure. Double-alpha male, huge (6-7 feet prob) with Arnie's physique. He became SUCH a pain in the ass in Ur that they petitioned the Gods to find ways to distract him (you could actually walk to the temple and talk to physical gods in those days). They arranged a near-equal gay-boy lover and some 'tasks'/goals. This kept him out of everybody's hair :-) Anyway, the tales were so good they were later translated into Akkadian and then Babylonian. Raw translations - including 'text missing' bits - can be found online. SO INTERESTING how civil life and concerns have changed SO LITTLE in 7000+ years !
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-22 17:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <4WX9P.39821$Uup4.921@fx10.iad> |
| In reply to | #62895 |
On 2024-12-22, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: > The great strength and the great weakness of christianity is that they > are bound by the book. This is a problem in todays woke world, The woke are bound by their own book - which is far more outlandish than the Bible. > but if they let it go, they won't be christians any longer. I respect > the guys who struggled to reconcile the book with todays world without > giving it up completely. The literalists have always had - and been - a problem. I resolved the issue in my school days. The literature classes we took taught us about metaphor and simile, and I saw no reason why the seven days of creation should not be metaphorical rather than literal. Suddenly there was no conflict. There are lots of things like that in the book. -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | Growth for the sake of \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | growth is the ideology X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | of the cancer cell. / \ if you read it the right way. | -- Edward Abbey
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-22 20:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lsra62F8oajU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62906 |
On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 17:23:12 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > The literalists have always had - and been - a problem. I resolved the > issue in my school days. The literature classes we took taught us about > metaphor and simile, and I saw no reason why the seven days of creation > should not be metaphorical rather than literal. Suddenly there was no > conflict. There are lots of things like that in the book. Literacy and the printing press allowed many people to read the bible and come up with novel interpretations.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-22 22:55 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <d653d34d-4cde-1017-a169-fabcd082d754@example.net> |
| In reply to | #62906 |
On Sun, 22 Dec 2024, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On 2024-12-22, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: > >> The great strength and the great weakness of christianity is that they >> are bound by the book. This is a problem in todays woke world, > > The woke are bound by their own book - which is far more outlandish > than the Bible. What bible do they have? Woke will self destruct into ever smaller factions. Eventually it ends up as individualism, which is good, or it will spend itself on in fighting and go away as a political force. >> but if they let it go, they won't be christians any longer. I respect >> the guys who struggled to reconcile the book with todays world without >> giving it up completely. > > The literalists have always had - and been - a problem. I resolved the > issue in my school days. The literature classes we took taught us about > metaphor and simile, and I saw no reason why the seven days of creation > should not be metaphorical rather than literal. Suddenly there was no > conflict. There are lots of things like that in the book. This is the truth!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-23 01:12 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <IbucnedgopGmYvX6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #62919 |
On 12/22/24 4:55 PM, D wrote: > > > On Sun, 22 Dec 2024, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > >> On 2024-12-22, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >> >>> The great strength and the great weakness of christianity is that they >>> are bound by the book. This is a problem in todays woke world, >> >> The woke are bound by their own book - which is far more outlandish >> than the Bible. > > What bible do they have? It's all on TicTok ... just not quite consolidated into one place :-) > Woke will self destruct into ever smaller > factions. Eventually it ends up as individualism, which is good, or it > will spend itself on in fighting and go away as a political force. Woke is already imploding, fast. It was just unsustainable nonsense. 'DEI' is in the dumpster, all the weird trannie stuff - Joe just DROPPED "Title IX". "Equality of Result" just couldn't be real. It was all a fanatical cult religion. If they could have burned heretics at the stake they would have. Still did damage ...... I've a cousin (2nd/3rd?) who long back when she was about 10 wondered aloud why the govt just didn't give everybody Free Money. Then nobody would have to work or anything ! She wasn't un-intelligent, just hideously naive. Alas 'Woke' Gens-Z/A2, even older and supposedly more informed, STILL believe in that sort of paradigm. Can't figure out how to wipe yer ass - wheeled-in with a needle in your arm once a month - you should be director of NASA or SecDef or Boeing CEO or something ! >>> but if they let it go, they won't be christians any longer. I respect >>> the guys who struggled to reconcile the book with todays world without >>> giving it up completely. >> >> The literalists have always had - and been - a problem. I resolved the >> issue in my school days. The literature classes we took taught us about >> metaphor and simile, and I saw no reason why the seven days of creation >> should not be metaphorical rather than literal. Suddenly there was no >> conflict. There are lots of things like that in the book. > > This is the truth! BUT there are still rather a LOT of people who do NOT see it as metaphor - but as an exact description. They are real, they are many, they are amongst us, they are in powerful agencies and governments. However, would your/my favs be any 'better' for the masses, the Big Equation ??? "Mystic crystal revelations and the mind's true liberation" - or just Fascism v7.2 ??? :-) Just sayin' ... don't be TOO proud, TOO sure. In the 1800s 'science' was NOT convinced of the same 'truths' we worship today. Mary Shelly did NOT pull that all out of her ass - there were 'learned men' who REALLY thought that way. What will we "know" 100 years from now ? MAYBE best to leave a lot of stuff - esp with political/social implications - kinda "fuzzy".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-23 08:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vkb8l1$14c3t$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #62934 |
On 23/12/2024 06:12, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > On 12/22/24 4:55 PM, D wrote: > >> Woke will self destruct into ever smaller factions. Eventually it ends >> up as individualism, which is good, or it will spend itself on in >> fighting and go away as a political force. > > Woke is already imploding, fast. It was just > unsustainable nonsense. 'DEI' is in the > dumpster, all the weird trannie stuff - Joe > just DROPPED "Title IX". "Equality of Result" > just couldn't be real. It was all a fanatical > cult religion. If they could have burned heretics > at the stake they would have. Still did damage ...... > And whoever invented the term didn't even use the correct term. Woke is the past participle. Awoken correct. Or awake. So you know it was invented by uneducated people or people deliberatilytrying to seem that way. > I've a cousin (2nd/3rd?) who long back when she was > about 10 wondered aloud why the govt just didn't > give everybody Free Money. Then nobody would have > to work or anything ! She wasn't un-intelligent, > just hideously naive. Alas 'Woke' Gens-Z/A2, > even older and supposedly more informed, STILL > believe in that sort of paradigm. Can't figure out > how to wipe yer ass - wheeled-in with a needle > in your arm once a month - you should be director > of NASA or SecDef or Boeing CEO or something ! Probably no worse than current politicians... >> This is the truth! > > BUT there are still rather a LOT of people who do > NOT see it as metaphor - but as an exact description. > They are real, they are many, they are amongst us, > they are in powerful agencies and governments. > They are weak because they cannot stand to have more than one relative truth, but must needs believe in some absolute Truth. When I becaqme a man I put away childish things. > However, would your/my favs be any 'better' for > the masses, the Big Equation ??? > > "Mystic crystal revelations and the mind's true > liberation" - or just Fascism v7.2 ??? :-) > > Just sayin' ... don't be TOO proud, TOO sure. > > In the 1800s 'science' was NOT convinced of the > same 'truths' we worship today. Mary Shelly > did NOT pull that all out of her ass - there > were 'learned men' who REALLY thought that way. > > What will we "know" 100 years from now ? > The world view - the weltaunshuung - or zeitgeist, changes. The snowflake generation were taught all this bullshit: To them it is simply 'real' . And the consequences of this belief and those that taught it to them is as intended a destruction of civilisation. Unfortunately the promised communist Utopia isn't happening. Poverty destruction and war is. > MAYBE best to leave a lot of stuff - esp with > political/social implications - kinda "fuzzy". Best <=>worst? Who knows? Who cares? Too many whys. Too many wheres. -- Renewable energy: Expensive solutions that don't work to a problem that doesn't exist instituted by self legalising protection rackets that don't protect, masquerading as public servants who don't serve the public.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-23 20:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lstv3gFlilgU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #62943 |
On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 08:57:05 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > And whoever invented the term didn't even use the correct term. Woke is > the past participle. Awoken correct. Or awake. > So you know it was invented by uneducated people or people > deliberatilytrying to seem that way. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African-American_English The blacks were using 'woke' long before it was adopted by the left. I'm sure you wouldn't have to go far to find English speakers like Yorkies that are semi-intelligible.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-23 12:52 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <7b690777-da9c-2a39-a400-e4b963e020ad@example.net> |
| In reply to | #62934 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Mon, 23 Dec 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > On 12/22/24 4:55 PM, D wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, 22 Dec 2024, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >> >>> On 2024-12-22, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >>> >>>> The great strength and the great weakness of christianity is that they >>>> are bound by the book. This is a problem in todays woke world, >>> >>> The woke are bound by their own book - which is far more outlandish >>> than the Bible. >> >> What bible do they have? > > It's all on TicTok ... just not quite consolidated > into one place :-) Ahhh! You made me feel old. I've never had tictok but I hear about it in the media of course. Many countries are thinking about banning it or implementing an age limit I've heard. Sometimes I wonder about the age on usenet. I feel younger than you. My feeling is that you guys are around 60. >> Woke will self destruct into ever smaller factions. Eventually it ends up >> as individualism, which is good, or it will spend itself on in fighting and >> go away as a political force. > > Woke is already imploding, fast. It was just > unsustainable nonsense. 'DEI' is in the > dumpster, all the weird trannie stuff - Joe > just DROPPED "Title IX". "Equality of Result" > just couldn't be real. It was all a fanatical > cult religion. If they could have burned heretics > at the stake they would have. Still did damage ...... Excellent! My predictions are coming true! ;) It just took a couple of years and a financial crisis. ;) > I've a cousin (2nd/3rd?) who long back when she was > about 10 wondered aloud why the govt just didn't > give everybody Free Money. Then nobody would have > to work or anything ! She wasn't un-intelligent, > just hideously naive. Alas 'Woke' Gens-Z/A2, > even older and supposedly more informed, STILL > believe in that sort of paradigm. Can't figure out > how to wipe yer ass - wheeled-in with a needle > in your arm once a month - you should be director > of NASA or SecDef or Boeing CEO or something ! > >>>> but if they let it go, they won't be christians any longer. I respect >>>> the guys who struggled to reconcile the book with todays world without >>>> giving it up completely. >>> >>> The literalists have always had - and been - a problem. I resolved the >>> issue in my school days. The literature classes we took taught us about >>> metaphor and simile, and I saw no reason why the seven days of creation >>> should not be metaphorical rather than literal. Suddenly there was no >>> conflict. There are lots of things like that in the book. >> >> This is the truth! > > BUT there are still rather a LOT of people who do > NOT see it as metaphor - but as an exact description. > They are real, they are many, they are amongst us, > they are in powerful agencies and governments. > > However, would your/my favs be any 'better' for > the masses, the Big Equation ??? Maybe they can learn? Another powerful answer is that sometimes we just don't know, and that it's ok to suspend judgment and collect further evidence. For me, that is one of the strengths and the beauty of agnosticism! =) It touches a little bit on the Natural Ontological Attitude (NOA), I still can't make up my mind if it is brilliant or trivial, but I've thought similar thoughts myself. > "Mystic crystal revelations and the mind's true > liberation" - or just Fascism v7.2 ??? :-) Sadly it can way too often be utilized for fascism 7.2. =( > Just sayin' ... don't be TOO proud, TOO sure. True! > In the 1800s 'science' was NOT convinced of the > same 'truths' we worship today. Mary Shelly > did NOT pull that all out of her ass - there > were 'learned men' who REALLY thought that way. > > What will we "know" 100 years from now ? > > MAYBE best to leave a lot of stuff - esp with > political/social implications - kinda "fuzzy". I think this is wise.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-23 20:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnvmjjoe.2t5ak.lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> |
| In reply to | #62934 |
On 2024-12-23, 186282@ud0s4.net <186283@ud0s4.net> wrote: > Alas 'Woke' Gens-Z/A2, > even older and supposedly more informed, STILL > believe in that sort of paradigm. Can't figure out > how to wipe yer ass - wheeled-in with a needle > in your arm once a month - you should be director > of NASA or SecDef or Boeing CEO or something ! This is not a fair criticism of "woke liberals". There are plenty of "conservative" politicians and their family members with a similar feeling that no particular knowledge experience or subject matter expertise is required to be Defense secretary, Director of National Intelligence, ambassador to Israel or something.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-24 12:44 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <9ea5ede8-c8e2-6659-9165-cdef8b9a2a49@example.net> |
| In reply to | #62976 |
On Mon, 23 Dec 2024, Lars Poulsen wrote: > On 2024-12-23, 186282@ud0s4.net <186283@ud0s4.net> wrote: >> Alas 'Woke' Gens-Z/A2, >> even older and supposedly more informed, STILL >> believe in that sort of paradigm. Can't figure out >> how to wipe yer ass - wheeled-in with a needle >> in your arm once a month - you should be director >> of NASA or SecDef or Boeing CEO or something ! > > This is not a fair criticism of "woke liberals". There are plenty of > "conservative" politicians and their family members with a similar > feeling that no particular knowledge experience or subject matter > expertise is required to be Defense secretary, Director of National > Intelligence, ambassador to Israel or something. > This is incorrect. Conservatives are always smart, polite and very beautiful people. Woke liberals are much more often homos, which is not so good. I invite everyone to look at the woke disaster that is sweden for an example of how quickly a country can go to hell if wokeness remains unchallenged.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-16 00:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <3Nqcncx9-a5sKsL6nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #62478 |
On 12/15/24 5:06 PM, D wrote: > > > On Sun, 15 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote: > >> On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 11:40:04 +0100, D wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 15 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 23:16:57 +0100, D wrote: >>>> >>>>> Fascinating! Thank you for sharing! >>>> >>>> I never saw one but there were also ELF transmitters. >>>> >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extremely_low_frequency >>>> >>>> I think some of the frequencies are still in use but nobody is talking. >>>> Imagine what it would be like if humans could directly perceive the sea >>>> of electromagnetic radiation we live in. >>>> >>>> One project I turned down was a botanist with a theory that trees >>>> communicated via electromagnetic waves. The idea hasn't gone away. >>>> >>>> https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/the-whispering- >>>> trees-180968084/ >>>> >>>> There is evidence that EMFs do affect trees though. >>>> >>>> https://ehtrust.org/electromagnetic-fields-impact-tree-plant-growth/ >>>> >>>> Sometimes for the better? >>>> >>>> https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg14519600-500-forest-grows-tall- >> on- >>>> radio-waves/ >>>> >>>> It reminds me of when RF heat sealers were introduced. The folklore >>>> suggested that women working around them either became sterile or >>>> amazingly fecund. Humans love their stories. >>> >>> Shouldn't it be quite easy to prove? I mean EMF:s can be measured and >>> plants can be measured and analyzed? >> >> Prove? Urban legends are not susceptible to proof. > > True! Why let proof get in the way of a nice conspiracy! ;) > >>> Latency would be huge, but that never stopped me with my 9600 modem, and >>> for talking like this, is not a problem. Downloading massive amounts of >>> data would be painful though. >> >> Years ago I played around with amateur packet radio. 9600 was possible >> with more sophisticated hardware but the local club never made it past >> 1200. It was usable. Part of my introduction to Linux was it supported >> AX. >> 25. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AX.25 >> >> I still have the TNC but interest in it dropped off rapidly. For that >> matter many people who used 2 meter handitalkies left when cheap >> cellphones came along. There still is some interest in HF digital modes >> but the ham population is aging out. There still is a lot of ham support >> for Linux. >> >> https://sourceforge.net/projects/kb1oiq-andysham/ > > This is sad. I've heard that cheap chinese radios (Baofeng?) are > popular. I also feel as if this field is perhaps regulated to death? I > think in some countries there are free bands, but I'm not sure. > > Personally, if it was unregulated, I'd at least be curious! But now, > with tests, and loads of stuff to study, I'd never do it only to scratch > a mild itch. > > Same for me with guns. If they would be unregulated, I'd definitely buy > a gun! Now with all the licenses, testing, competition requirements, > safe storage laws etc. I can't really be bothered. =( > > Only way is to 3d print or build something myself. Move to the USA :-) We have guns out the ass - most people have several. You can have an arsenal out of a 'Terminator' movie. Yep, there IS some abuse, but - pop corrected - doesn't seem THAT much worse than the UK. Almost all abuse is from GANGS, not Joe Citizens. Any downsides are compensated by personal rights/autonomy/defense issues. But then the UK/EU isn't INTERESTED in individual and citizen rights/power/safety any more, is it ? Power to THE STATE - and NOBODY else ....... "But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother.”
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-16 10:51 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <305d5af9-8a24-b375-323e-c250bdc27e94@example.net> |
| In reply to | #62497 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Mon, 16 Dec 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > On 12/15/24 5:06 PM, D wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, 15 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 11:40:04 +0100, D wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 15 Dec 2024, rbowman wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 23:16:57 +0100, D wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Fascinating! Thank you for sharing! >>>>> >>>>> I never saw one but there were also ELF transmitters. >>>>> >>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extremely_low_frequency >>>>> >>>>> I think some of the frequencies are still in use but nobody is talking. >>>>> Imagine what it would be like if humans could directly perceive the sea >>>>> of electromagnetic radiation we live in. >>>>> >>>>> One project I turned down was a botanist with a theory that trees >>>>> communicated via electromagnetic waves. The idea hasn't gone away. >>>>> >>>>> https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/the-whispering- >>>>> trees-180968084/ >>>>> >>>>> There is evidence that EMFs do affect trees though. >>>>> >>>>> https://ehtrust.org/electromagnetic-fields-impact-tree-plant-growth/ >>>>> >>>>> Sometimes for the better? >>>>> >>>>> https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg14519600-500-forest-grows-tall- >>> on- >>>>> radio-waves/ >>>>> >>>>> It reminds me of when RF heat sealers were introduced. The folklore >>>>> suggested that women working around them either became sterile or >>>>> amazingly fecund. Humans love their stories. >>>> >>>> Shouldn't it be quite easy to prove? I mean EMF:s can be measured and >>>> plants can be measured and analyzed? >>> >>> Prove? Urban legends are not susceptible to proof. >> >> True! Why let proof get in the way of a nice conspiracy! ;) >> >>>> Latency would be huge, but that never stopped me with my 9600 modem, and >>>> for talking like this, is not a problem. Downloading massive amounts of >>>> data would be painful though. >>> >>> Years ago I played around with amateur packet radio. 9600 was possible >>> with more sophisticated hardware but the local club never made it past >>> 1200. It was usable. Part of my introduction to Linux was it supported AX. >>> 25. >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AX.25 >>> >>> I still have the TNC but interest in it dropped off rapidly. For that >>> matter many people who used 2 meter handitalkies left when cheap >>> cellphones came along. There still is some interest in HF digital modes >>> but the ham population is aging out. There still is a lot of ham support >>> for Linux. >>> >>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/kb1oiq-andysham/ >> >> This is sad. I've heard that cheap chinese radios (Baofeng?) are popular. I >> also feel as if this field is perhaps regulated to death? I think in some >> countries there are free bands, but I'm not sure. >> >> Personally, if it was unregulated, I'd at least be curious! But now, with >> tests, and loads of stuff to study, I'd never do it only to scratch a mild >> itch. >> >> Same for me with guns. If they would be unregulated, I'd definitely buy a >> gun! Now with all the licenses, testing, competition requirements, safe >> storage laws etc. I can't really be bothered. =( >> >> Only way is to 3d print or build something myself. > > > Move to the USA :-) You can bet your sweet little ass that this is my long term plan. I do have family commitments which keep me in europe though. My father I think would not be interested in moving to the US at his age. But once he passes, I and the wife are finally free to move. > We have guns out the ass - most people have > several. You can have an arsenal out of a > 'Terminator' movie. Yep, there IS some abuse, > but - pop corrected - doesn't seem THAT much > worse than the UK. Almost all abuse is from > GANGS, not Joe Citizens. Any downsides are > compensated by personal rights/autonomy/defense > issues. Nothing that bothers me. If you delve down into the statistics, and look at who shoots who, and where they enjoy shooting each other, you quickly realize that there's about as big a chance in the US of experiencing gun violence as in europe, unless you insist on going straight to the ghetto and provoking the first drug dealer you find, in which case it's your own fault. > But then the UK/EU isn't INTERESTED in individual > and citizen rights/power/safety any more, is it ? > Power to THE STATE - and NOBODY else ....... This is correct. The EU is hellbent on becoming a new socialist federation. Once the EU gets full taxation powers, it's game over. The EU politicians have set themselves up as a new nobility. They get lifetime pensions after 1 or 2 terms in office, they get a huge part of their salaries tax free, they get free business travel, taxi, free apartments, and of course, legal immunity. I cannot for the life of me imagine how come the public hasn't rebelled at the revolting life styles and benefits they have awarded themselves. And they then have the stomach to complain and call entrepreneurs "greedy". > "But it was all right, everything was all right, the > struggle was finished. He had won the victory over > himself. He loved Big Brother.” I'm a long term optimist, so I guess the saying goes "over my dead body". ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 26 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 24 25 [26] 27 28 … 50 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web