Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #27906 > unrolled thread

Good PCIe wifi cards for Linux?

Started byBud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com>
First post2019-08-22 08:33 -0400
Last post2019-08-31 10:59 -0400
Articles 5 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc


Contents

  Good PCIe wifi cards for Linux? Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2019-08-22 08:33 -0400
    Re: Good PCIe wifi cards for Linux? Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2019-08-22 14:40 -0400
      Re: Good PCIe wifi cards for Linux? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-08-23 08:27 +0100
    Re: Good PCIe wifi cards for Linux? Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2019-08-22 19:15 +0000
      Re: Good PCIe wifi cards for Linux? Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2019-08-31 10:59 -0400

#27906 — Good PCIe wifi cards for Linux?

FromBud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com>
Date2019-08-22 08:33 -0400
SubjectGood PCIe wifi cards for Linux?
Message-ID<gs7gc2Ffkj2U2@mid.individual.net>

I've got a bunch of newer desktop PCs running Linux, some with AMD CPUs
and some Intel, that I need to setup with wifi. I'd prefer to use PCIe
wifi cards instead of USB adapters. I also want to use 5G if possible.

Can anyone recommend a good chipset or brand to look for, or ones to
avoid?

The PCs are mostly running Ubuntu, with a few running CentOS.

In the past I've figured that the Qualcomm and Intel wireless chipsets
were good, but someone was telling me that the Qualcomm ones have had
some problems with Linux recently, and that recent Intel ones only work
well with Intel CPUs. However, he hadn't used Qualcomm in the last 5
years or so and he's using an Intel one with an Intel CPU and hasn't
tried it with an AMD Ryzen one. So, his reservations about Qualcomm and
Intel are not backed by any facts that I can see.





[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#27918

FromAndreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net>
Date2019-08-22 14:40 -0400
Message-ID<87ftltvya9.fsf@usenet.ankman.de>
In reply to#27906
On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 08:33:06 -0400, Bud Frede wrote:
>
> I've got a bunch of newer desktop PCs running Linux, some with AMD CPUs
> and some Intel, that I need to setup with wifi. I'd prefer to use PCIe
> wifi cards instead of USB adapters. I also want to use 5G if possible.
>
> Can anyone recommend a good chipset or brand to look for, or ones to
> avoid?

Avoid Ralink. It sits in my AMD Debian laptop and kind of works. But
while in some public WIFI zones my Android logs in the laptop won't.

Also heard to avoid Ralink from another Linux user.
-- 
Andreas

My random thoughts and comments
https://news-commentaries.blogspot.com/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#27935

FromThe Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Date2019-08-23 08:27 +0100
Message-ID<qjo4hn$f4h$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#27918
On 22/08/2019 19:40, Andreas Kohlbach wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 08:33:06 -0400, Bud Frede wrote:
>>
>> I've got a bunch of newer desktop PCs running Linux, some with AMD CPUs
>> and some Intel, that I need to setup with wifi. I'd prefer to use PCIe
>> wifi cards instead of USB adapters. I also want to use 5G if possible.
>>
>> Can anyone recommend a good chipset or brand to look for, or ones to
>> avoid?
> 
> Avoid Ralink. It sits in my AMD Debian laptop and kind of works. But
> while in some public WIFI zones my Android logs in the laptop won't.
> 
> Also heard to avoid Ralink from another Linux user.
> 
I loathe broadcomm too.


-- 
You can get much farther with a kind word and a gun than you can with a 
kind word alone.

Al Capone

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#27923

FromEli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com>
Date2019-08-22 19:15 +0000
Message-ID<eli$1908221515@qaz.wtf>
In reply to#27906
In comp.os.linux.misc, Bud Frede  <frede@mouse-potato.com> wrote:
> I've got a bunch of newer desktop PCs running Linux, some with AMD CPUs
> and some Intel, that I need to setup with wifi. I'd prefer to use PCIe
> wifi cards instead of USB adapters. I also want to use 5G if possible.

https://www.thinkpenguin.com/gnu-linux/penguin-wireless-n-dual-band-pcie-card-gnu-linux-tpe-n300pcied23-w-full-low-profile-bracke

No personal experience with it, but the list of supported distributions
is extensive. I prefer wired connections for desktops.

Elijah
------
hasn't installed a PCIe card in so long

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#28069

FromBud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com>
Date2019-08-31 10:59 -0400
Message-ID<gsvgbaFm8fpU3@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#27923
Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> writes:

> In comp.os.linux.misc, Bud Frede  <frede@mouse-potato.com> wrote:
>> I've got a bunch of newer desktop PCs running Linux, some with AMD CPUs
>> and some Intel, that I need to setup with wifi. I'd prefer to use PCIe
>> wifi cards instead of USB adapters. I also want to use 5G if possible.
>
> https://www.thinkpenguin.com/gnu-linux/penguin-wireless-n-dual-band-pcie-card-gnu-linux-tpe-n300pcied23-w-full-low-profile-bracke
>
> No personal experience with it, but the list of supported distributions
> is extensive. I prefer wired connections for desktops.
>
> Elijah
> ------
> hasn't installed a PCIe card in so long


Thanks everyone!

I'll give this card from thinkpenguin a try, and I've also ordered a
couple of other cards that use the same Atheros AR9280 chipset to try as
well.

I had originally thought of just using USB Wifi adapters, but was told
that in the past those have "disappeared." :-) Cards actually in the
case are seen as less likely to walk off, although I wonder if the
screw-on antennas wouldn't be tempting? I guess we'll see.

Pretty much every other system is a laptop, with one of those Kensington
locks securing it, and of course no need for wifi cards or even
keyboards and mice.


[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc


csiph-web